THE 5G DEMENTORS MEET THE 5G ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE

By Claire Edwards

This is my last Stop 5G Newsletter, or at least it is the last of this series of newsletters as I intend in the future to do the journalism on 5G, so signally not done by the mainstream media.

Next month, Arthur Firstenberg will be arranging for the Appeal to be hand-delivered to the UN, EU, WHO and governments. It seems a good moment to try to sum up my understanding of how we came to be in this 5G mad zone, poised to self-destruct. How on earth did we get here? It appears that every expansion of the use of electricity since the 19th century correlates with drastic rises in all the modern diseases of civilisation, but this information has been kept from the public in order not to impede commercial profit, military expansion and universal convenience.

Since 100 years+ of quantum physics has had little to no impact on the way we live our lives or how we perceive reality, we in the West still labour under the illusion that our bodies are made up of lumps of discrete matter that can be conveniently removed by a surgeon’s knife when they go wrong, this having been established in the 18th and 19th centuries by a grave-robbing spree to collect corpses for surgical experiments. Since no one seems to have considered the possibility that a living body might differ significantly from a dead one, this crude experimentation formed the basis for the whole system of what we now call Western medicine. All traditional and ancient healing wisdom based on a holistic view of a living body was outlawed by enforcing membership of a “professional body”.

In an inversion, typical of our Western thinking, natural healing methods dating back thousands of years could then be termed not “traditional”, but “alternative” and “backward”. Taking advantage of this – let us charitably call it an induced misconception – our militaries discovered that microwave weapons could be deployed silently and secretly to “defend” us from our alleged enemies. They gleefully amassed compendia of thousands of studies, many done in the Soviet bloc, in order to solidify their knowledge of the many and varied types of biological damage that these weapons could inflict on human beings at very little cost or inconvenience to those deploying them. There was even a symposium organised by the World Health Organization in 1973 to discuss The Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation, but the participants must have subsequently decided not to share this information with the public in view of their intelligent propensity to suspect that one day microwave weapons might be turned on them. Instead of informing the public that their bodies were, in fact, not solid at all but entirely electrical, these military and industrial entities kept secret all their thousands of studies on the biological effects of microwaves.

They established regulatory bodies with grand names intended to impress the public, filled them with industry and military stooges, and set electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure limits so high that it would be impossible to exceed them, similar to setting car speed limits at a thousand miles/kilometres per hour. Russia’s public exposure standards are 100 times more stringent than those in the US. The self-proclaimed international commission on non-ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP), which is an NGO with no international or official status that appoints its own members with no oversight or transparency and protects no one from anything, while disclaiming all liability on its website for any of its pronouncements, sets non-legally enforceable and astronomically high exposure guidelines that are time-averaged over 6 minutes to avoid taking peak pulsations into account and thereby falsify exposure calculations. What a pity no one told Jackie Kennedy about the 6-minute average when that magic bullet changed her life! How different history might have been!

These bizarre guidelines are embraced enthusiastically by the WHO and the International Telecommunication Union, both UN bodies, and most of the world’s governments, with no basis in law.

4G uses 2.45 GHz, which has been shown in more than 100 studies to cause a wide variety of severe damage to the body and nature at levels below the so-called safety guidelines of icnirp. Despite the regulatory agencies knowing this with absolute certainty since they have the study findings, they have told the public that there are only thermal or heating effects and continue to do so in their draft guidelines revised upwards to permit 5G. They have published pictures of plastic mannequin heads filled with gel that they put probes inside to demonstrate the heating effect. “Look at our wonderful science!”, they seem to say, “The mannequin head has suffered no ill-effects! Why should you worry?”

Of course, there were people who spent a lot of time exposed to EMR through computer screens or other devices, who started to complain of illnesses. This was not good because it could affect the sales of electrical products and impede the military developing ever more sophisticated weapons, so the corrupt WHO just called these people mad: on its website, it claimed that the EMR-related symptoms experienced by millions of people worldwide “may be due to pre-existing psychiatric conditions as well as stress reactions as a result of worrying about EMF health effects, rather than the EMF exposure itself”. Any apparent rise in cancer rates is rapidly attributed to improved diagnostic techniques rather than the more obvious true cause of exposure to an environmental toxin.

This was a good solution, for such people could not use machines to communicate to anyone else that they were experiencing health problems, and in fact even more conveniently, they became societal outcasts because many of them became homeless, living in cars in the woods where there was no EMR. And thus it was that almost no one learned that there was any problem. As you would expect, there were a few scientists who didn’t care for the idea of getting paid lots of money to tell lies that kill people and they started to try to advertise the truth, but it’s not difficult to arrange for them to lose their jobs or their study funding to silence them. All you need do then is simply buy up the media and pay journalists to dismiss tens of thousands of awkward scientific studies on the basis that they do not provide “solid”, “real”, “proven”, ”credible”, “convincing”, ”conclusive” or “established” evidence. And you employ pliable scientists to “muddy the waters” or “war-game” the science by producing studies that show inconclusive results.

As time went on, the military wanted industry to develop better weapons for them, but this was expensive, and frankly it was becoming quite difficult to convince the public that there were that many enemies that they needed to be protected from. A lot of effort was put into creating and funding so-called terrorists, but it didn’t do much good because the public didn’t need to make much effort to realize that they were way less likely to be killed by a terrorist than to get food-poisoning, for example. So the military and industry had a brilliant idea. What about commercializing this weapons technology as a communications technology that they could sell to the public, and then the public would pay for all the research and development of new and improved weapons? Even better, they knew that cell phones would be addictive so everyone would want a phone. And they would be able to control people’s minds and tell them what to think, what to do and what to buy. You could have complete physical surveillance inside and outside people’s homes. How perfect! You could have a completely orderly society, with no one complaining about how eight people had accumulated wealth equal to that possessed by half the population of the planet. And if one in two children become autistic, they would make really efficient, robotic workers, would always be happy and never make trouble!

We see endless articles saying it makes good business sense. After the kleptocracy of neoliberal economics, during which everything that could be stolen was stolen, all that is left is to consume the consumer him- or herself. Companies like Facebook are designed to do just that and Zuckerberg regards consumers as “dumb fucks” for giving away their information for free.

Already in 1981, icnirp’s predecessor organisation irpa acknowledged that general population exposure from man-made sources of microwave and RF radiation exceeded that from natural sources by many orders of magnitude. Work done by Russian and Ukrainian researchers published in a US review in 2001 established that, during the previous 50 years, the round-the-clock power of radio emissions had increased by a factor of more than 50,000. The same paper discussed the development of psychic disturbances under EMR exposure showing effects ranging from changes in mood to nonsensical ideas and aural and visual hallucinations, and disturbances in behaviour all the way to attempts at suicide.

While people’s minds are disturbed by their exposure to EMR, the mainstream media plies them with blanket coverage of Greta Thunberg fear-porning about an unsubstantiated 12 years until doomsday from non-existent anthropegenic climate change in order to persuade them that they need a totalitarian, world government that can guarantee their safety in uncertain times.

Populations have been discombobulated by 25 years of cell phone use, 12 of them under intense “smart” phone attack. Parents are so fascinated by their phones that their children drown in swimming pools right in front of them. More and more people walk out into the road when a car is coming or fall over or down something while peering into “smart’ phones.

We hear of adverse effects on learning, attention, and behavior. Children are being exposed to magnetic fields from cell phones that breach WHO’s recommended 0.3μT safety limit by a factor of 20,000. Meanwhile, insurance companies, which presumably have to protect their existence by keeping a grip on reality, refuse to insure against EMF injuries or damage.

The deployment of 5G is presented by militaries, governments and commercial entities as a race in which the winner takes all. Why should such a dangerous and completely untested technology have to be rolled out so quickly? Could it be that the Internet is empowering people who are increasingly impoverished to open their eyes about the kleptocrats who plunder the planet? Could it be that the true health effects of 25 years of cell phone use cannot much longer be hidden? Whatever the reason, Eisenhower’s military-industrial complex has revealed itself in the 5G project, showing its hand clearly in the crossover between the two, including in the regulatory agencies. The limited frequencies available have to be shared among commercial and military entities.

Thus 25 years of diminishing mental capacity among populations due to irradiation facilitated by the lie of the thermal hypothesis, combined with the apparent urgency to protect ill-gotten gains and prevent populations awakening to the truth and flexing their muscles to redress the power balance have conspired to produce a mad free-for-all – a license to irradiate without constraint from every corner of the planet and from above our heads. Technicans have been given free rein to dream up ways of attacking populations: from under manhole covers; from cabinets on the street; from lamp posts that blast blue light with no more diffusers, as well as 5G EMR in laser-like beams; from adhesive strips of tiny but highly powerful antennas hidden under carpets; on the street; in trains; in planes; in cars; in buses; blasting through the walls of our homes; from our television sets; from fridges, hairdryers, milk cartons, babies’ diapers, baby monitors, “smart”phones, “smart” meters, and soon from the trillions of devices that are planned to be connected to the Internet of Things. This is not to mention the plethora of “wearables” and cell phone apps that purport to help you monitor your health status while seriously undermining it.

The plan is to beam 5G down to Earth from satellites in the Earth orbits, from networked civil aircraft, from pseudo-satelites in the stratosphere … In other words, from everywhere. The stated plan and the word trumpeted in the 5G literature is to “blanket” every inch of the Earth, with no escape for any of the approximately 100 million people worldwide already made sick by the toxic environment supplied courtesy of the first to fourth generations of WiFi, to which 5G will be additional.

There will also be no escape for the trees, which have to go as they block the 5G signals and risk interrupting the continuous signals essential for self-driving vehicles, nor for the birds, the insects or the food chain. Any remnants of a sane, balanced, calm and quiet life will be wiped out by 5G, 4G, 3G, or any other G of wireless technology.

We are complicit in our own destruction and, worse, in the wanton destruction of all life on this Earth. Greed, fear, stupidity and hubris have brought us to this point, complemented by inanity, laziness, complacency and unconsciousness.

The 5G Dementors are coming In for the kill. The question is whether the people choosing to play out the Zombie Apocalypse on their “smart” phones can tear themselves away long enough to care. If they can, or if at least some of them can, they need to understand certain realities:

  1. There is no safe limit for artificial EMR. It is alien to our biology.
  2. Cell phones were never tested for health or safety and we should not be using them. They destroy us, our children, our fertility, our minds and our planetary home. Convenient they may be, but they have to go.
  3. WiFi was never tested for health or safety and we should not be using it. It destroys us, our children, our fertility, our minds and our planetary home. Convenient it may be, but it has to go.
  4. The problem with cell phones and WiFi has nothing to do with power levels. Wireless technology cannot be made safe by reducing the power. There are effects at near-zero power, and for some effects, there is an inverse power relationship, i.e. the lower the power, the worse the harm. 5. Electricity has been killing us slowly since its introduction. We need to constrain its use, not expand it. Fibre-optic cable enables 5G. If you don’t want 5G because it’s dangerous, don’t build the infrastructure that it depends on.
  5. Our bodies function on biophotons. Blue light from car headlamps and street lights – both of which for some unexplained reason suddenly are no longer fitted with diffusers – are killing us. Modulating light for LiFi would kill us faster and possibly even more effectively than 5G.
  6. There is ONE SOLUTION ONLY to the problems of WiFi, cell phones and 5G: STOP USING THEM. All the time you pretend to ask the telcos to stop building this infrastructure while you pay them to do so, you are sending the opposite message.
  7. Wake up! Choose life! Choose love! Choose the Earth!
  8. Smash your phone, get a landline and cable your computer. Or you could keep your portable computer, just as long as it is never connected to WiFi and killing all life in your vicinity.

It’s not rocket science. It’s not any kind of science. It’s simple common sense.

Stop 5G News: Eighth issue of the Stop 5G Space Appeal Newsletter

Click to View NewsLetter:  stop 5g news 8 september 2019

Eighth issue of the Stop 5G Space Appeal Newsletter

ACTION: 1st of every month: Disconnect Day – no MW/MMW devices to be used

ACTION: premier jour de chaque mois: jour déconnecté

AKTION: jeder erste des Monats stop mit Ihrem Handy und wifi router

Mostly in English, but items also in French, German. and some other languages. Note: this newsletter is A5 so if you print, choose setting “Fit to page” or similar.
To translate articles or websites, drop text or URL into Yandex Translate at https://translate.yandex.com/translate.

International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
www.5gspaceappeal.org/

 

BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded: Health Impacts Denied Despite Overwhelming Scientific Evidence

BBC Fake News on 5G Decoded: Health Impacts Denied Despite Overwhelming Scientific Evidence

by Claire Edwards

Listen to BBC radio: Under the Radar Episode 4 – 5G Friend or Foe? (July 2019) here.

***

Open letter to the “Under the Radar” BBC Programme Producer

I was hoping that I could leave it to others to refute the latest fake news on 5G from the BBC, but I feel obliged to wade in with the evidence since the BBC signally fails to provide it, perhaps corrupted like others by its recently rumoured collaboration with various telecommunications companies (Transparency International: Investigating Corruption in the Media and Telecoms Industries).

While I applaud your efforts to bring to public notice the concerns about 5G being rolled out without a single prior test to ascertain its implications for health or safety, and your success in finally persuading the BBC to at least mention some of those concerns, albeit via a rather minor and short radio programme rather than by doing this unprecedented planetary emergency justice by treating it in a full-length television programme, you seem oblivious to the bias evident in the production of the programme.

Let us examine how the impression is created in this programme that those who oppose 5G are somehow ignorant and foolish tin-foil-hat-wearers instead of who they really are: fully informed and intelligent individuals qualified and experienced in the field of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) who are seriously alarmed by the facts about 5G and its very real consequences extrapolated from the science on the devastating impacts of wireless generations 1-4.

First the presenter informs us that 230 scientists are concerned about the rollout, whereas in fact many thousands of scientists and physicians have expressed their concerns to date in at least 60 appeals: Doctors & Scientists Appeals For Stronger Electromagnetic Radiation Regulations and International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space — 134,458 signatories from 198 countries as of 2 August 2019. The presenter deliberately disparages the 230 scientists mentioned by employing the vernacular phrase “What’s their beef?” in preference to the more formal and respectful, What are their concerns?.

We hear from Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, who tells us that 5G millimetre waves interfere with biology, that the research is incomplete and that there have been no public consultation and no proper health and safety testing of 5G.

The science on electromagnetic radiation

It is to be noted – although of course not mentioned in the programme – that Dr Mallery-Blythe’s statements are backed up by the extensive science that has irrefutably established the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation (Irradiated: A comprehensive compilation and analysis of the literature on radiofrequency fields and the negative biological impacts of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (particularly radiofrequency fields) on biological organisms (416 pages); University of Aachen EMF Portal with 28,000+ studies. Even the BBC was prepared to question the safety of WiFi once upon a time – oops! – did you think we’d forgotten? (BBC Panorama, 2007: WiFi Warning Signal but that was presumably before the BBC itself got into bed with the telecoms industry, as has the New York Times (Who has NY Times in their pocket?; and NY Times 5G ties uncovered).

Dr Mallery-Blythe’s information is immediately undermined by the next segment, which takes place at a race track, where we hear in enthusiastic and excited tones reminiscent of the boys at Top Gearabout 5G connecting to cars at very high speeds. This research relates to the development of autonomous vehicles, but we are not informed of this.

We hear from Peter Claydon, AutoAir Project Director, who tells us that the “international organisation” ICNIRP goes back to the 1960s and consists of a group of medical experts and that the UK bases the guidelines on installation of mobile technology on the ICNIRP recommendations.

ICNIRP: true status and extensive literature on ICNIRP corruption

The presenter fails to challenge Claydon on the inaccuracy of his assertions. ICNIRP is, in fact, an NGO under German law with no international legal status. It appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor, operates with zero transparency and is accountable to no one. It disclaims all responsibility on its website for any of its information (see this), including its own guidelines, which are based on cherry-picked science that predates the advent of mobile phones. ICNIRP has been accused of corruption by countless people over many years, most recently by (1) Investigate Europe: The 5G Mass Experiment and The ICNIRP Cartel: Who’s Who in the EMF Research World; (2) Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD: Is ICNIRP Reliable Enough to Dictate Meaning of Science to the Governmental Risk Regulators? (See this); (3) Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD: The ICNIRP Cartel and the 5G Mass Experiment (see this); and (4) Professor Emeritus Martin Pall, Response to 2018 ICNIRP Draft Guidelines and Appendices on Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz (see this) and Eight Repeatedly Documented Findings Each Show that EMF Safety Guidelines Do Not Predict Biological Effects and Are Therefore Fraudulent (see this).

The presenter invites Claydon, who is clearly a technical person and neither an EMF scientist nor a medical doctor, to “fundamentally reassure those people who are concerned that [5G] may affect human health that you don’t think it will”, despite the fact that Claydon is not qualified to provide a scientific or medical opinion. Claydon obligingly replies, “No … the research that’s been done going back decades is equally applicable to 5G as it was to any other radio technology in the past”.

The devastating health consequences from 20 years of mobile phone use

Significantly, Claydon does not provide any assurance that 5G is safe. In fact, all wireless technology is unsafe, and the health results emerging now from the last 20 years of intense use of mobile phones is revealing the devastating health effects, including autism, ADHD, catastrophic drops in fertility, early onset dementias and a phenomenal rise in suicides, among others (see, for example. the US Blue Cross Blue Shield health insurance association report of April 2019 entitled “The Health of Millennials” and Are rises in Electro-Magnetic Field in the human environment, interacting with multiple environmental pollutions, the tripping point for increases in neurological deaths in the Western World? in Medical Hypotheses: Excerpt:

[W]e hypothesise that amajor contribution for the relative sudden upsurge in neurological morbidity in the Western world (1989–2015), is because of increased background EMFthat has become the tipping point … The unprecedented neurological death rates, all within just 25 years, demand a re-examination of long-term EMF safety related to the increasing background EMF on human health. We do not wish to ‘stop the modern world’, only make it safer.”

Paul Brodeur, in his book entitled The Zapping of America, states

“Microwave radiation can blind you, alter your behaviour, cause genetic damage, even kill you. The risks have been hidden from you by the Pentagon, the State Department, and the electronics industry. With this book, the microwave cover-up is ended.”

Next we hear very briefly from someone who is disparagingly described as “A so-called WiFi refugee”, who is permitted a few seconds to tell us about his heart pain and headaches caused by wireless technology.

This is followed by a longer segment in which we hear Senator Richard Blumenthal establish at a US Senate hearing in February 2019 that the telecoms industry has invested zero dollars in health and safety testing of 5G, such that Blumenthal concludes, “So we’re flying blind here so far as health and safety is concerned”.

Once again, the facts are promptly undermined by the presenter assuring us emphatically that Marc Allera, CEO of major telco EE (and therefore highly unlikely to provide an unbiased opinion), “is convinced the new service is safe”. Marc Allera is a businessman and not a medical doctor and his assurance is obviously self-interested and carries no scientific weight. Allera talks of “the extreme rumours … none of which are true”. “We’ve worked for more than 30 years with bodies like the WHO that create standards …”.

Corruption at the World Health Organization (WHO)

The World Health Organization has conveniently forgotten that it co-organised a symposium in 1973 entitled “The Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation” (emphasis added).  It has no prerogative to unilaterally endorse guidelines produced by a shady NGO in un-transparent circumstances. The WHO and its EMF project – about which Mike Repacholi, founder of ICNIRP and former director of WHO’s EMF project, revealed that up to half of WHO’s EMF project funding came from wireless and electric utility industry groups (see this) – have also been accused multiple times of corruption and co-option by industry (UN Human Rights Council, 22 February 2019: 5G is Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Under Resolution 39/46 (see this); The WHO Cover-Up That is Costing Us the Earth (see this); WHO Watch: Mike Repacholi and the EMF Charade, Microwave News, 2005.

Giving the impression that the facts of 5G’s safety have now been definitively established – by sweeping, erroneous and unsupported assertions – the presenter marvels in a disparaging tone that, “Despite reassurances from the industry that 5G is just as safe as 3G, 4G and the technology before it, Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe isn’t convinced”. The patronising tone implies that she cannot be quite right in the head to still be insisting that 5G is not safe, despite having heard the reassurances – from medically unqualified and self-interested individuals.

The presenter then adopts a very fast delivery as he admits that “No specific testing on the effects of 5G on human health seems to have been carried out …”. The qualifiers “specific” and “seems to” employed here are redundant, misleading and inaccurate, for in fact no testing whatsoeveron the effects of 5G on human health has been carried out prior to its rollout on Earth, in space and in the stratosphere.

He then rushes on, with a rapid “But” to imply that this complete absence of the legally required health and safety testing of 5G is a negligible matter that should not concern us, to introduce in a confident tone a rent-a-sceptic US equivalent of UK biologist Richard Dawkins, who is systematically invited onto the British media to debunk scientists from any field of science whose evidence contradicts corporate orthodoxy and impedes profit. The presenter clearly intends us to understand that this “expert” will definitively settle the matter. Brought on as the culmination of the programme, Dr Steve Novella, Assistant Professor of Neurology at Yale, informs us in an authoritative manner as follows:

The potential hazard from 5G is actually very, very low. It is an electromagnetic field, but it is non-ionising radiation – it’s not strong enough to break chemical bonds, damage DNA, for example [1]. There’s a lot of research into the biological effects of radiofrequency, electromagnetic waves and the only reproducible effect that’s come out of this research is slight tissue heating [2].

That’s it. So there really isn’t particularly much of a reason to think that exposure to 5G through our technology is hazardous. There’s no evidence of any risk from it, that it causes any actual harm [3].

When you think about it, we’re getting bathed by the sun with higher frequency, more intense electromagnetic radiation every day than you’re going to get exposed to through 5G!” [4]

Novella is 100% wrong: Particularly much of numerous reasons to believe exposure to 5G is massively hazardous

  1. “It is non-ionising radiation – It’s not strong enough to break chemical bonds, damage DNA, for example.”

University of Aachen EMF Portal, sample literature search for “DNA damage”: 623 articles were found; telco Swisscom filed a patent in 2004 on a method and system for reducing electrosmog in wireless local networks that states clearly that WiFi damages DNA (see this).

  1. “There’s a lot of research into the biological effects of radiofrequency, electromagnetic waves and the only reproducible effect that’s come out of this research is slight tissue heating.”

Irradiated: A comprehensive compilation and analysis of the literature on radiofrequency fields and the negative biological impacts of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (particularly radiofrequency fields) on biological organisms (416 pages; see this); University of Aachen EMF Portal with 28,000+ studies: see this). Even the corrupt ICNIRP admits in its 1998 guidelines that “Compared with continuous-wave (CW) radiation, pulsed microwave fields with the same average rate of energy deposition in tissues are generally more effective in producing a biological response, especially when there is a well-defined threshold that must be exceeded to elicit the effect (emphasis added; ICNIRP 1996; see this).

  1. “There’s no evidence of any risk from it, that it causes any actual harm.”

University of Aachen EMF Portal: The core of the EMF-Portal is an extensive literature database with an inventory of 28,841 publications and 6,390 summaries of individual scientific studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields (see this).

  1. “We’re getting bathed by the sun with higher frequency, more intense electromagnetic radiation every day than you’re going to get exposed to through 5G!”

According to Professor Olle Johansson, recently retired from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, current public exposure to wireless radiation (before the addition of 5G) is approximately a quintillion times (1,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 18 zeros) greater than natural, background radiation (see this).

Natural background radiation is neither pulsed nor modulated, as scientist and co-author of the 5G Space Appeal Arthur Firstenberg explains:

The harm has nothing to do with power levels. This is what nobody understands. Power level is relevant for only one type of effect: heating. For all other effects, it is completely irrelevant. There are effects at near-zero power, and for some effects, there is an inversepower relationship, i.e. the lower the power, the worse the harm. SAR [specific absorption rate, used to express the power absorbed per mass of tissue] is completely irrelevant for non-thermal effects. 

It is not the power level that does the harm. It is the degree of coherence, type and depth of modulation, wavelength, number of frequencies, number of signals, bandwidth, shape of the waves, pulse height, pulse width, rise and fall time, and other properties of the radiation. The unimportance of power levels for effects other than heat has been shown many times. In Salford’s studies the lowest power levels caused the most leakage in the blood-brain barrier. Blackman, Bawin, Dutta, Schwartz, and Kunjilwar all in different laboratories, found that calcium efflux from neural and cardiac cells occurred at specific frequencies and exposure levels and did not increase with power. In Dutta’s study a 3,000-fold decrease in power caused a 4-fold increase in calcium efflux. Sadchikovaand her Soviet colleagues found that workers exposed to the lowest power levels suffered more often from radio wave sickness. Belyaev found that genetic effects occurred at specific frequencies and the magnitude of the effect did not change with power level over 16 orders of magnitude.The assumption that wireless technology can be made safe by reducing the power is proven wrong.

The presenter sums up the findings of the programme:

“I’ve seen why people are getting so excited about the rollout globally  … But while many feel that 5G isthe best thing since sliced bread, there are still those who believe that if the technology continues to be rolled out without the testing they demand, we could all soon be toast!”

Sound distortion is applied as this is delivered; that, plus the trivialisation of “we could soon be toast”, and the intonation implying ridicule of the idea that people can really be so petty-minded as to demand that the national and international laws requiring prior testing, environmental impact assessments and application of the precautionary principle be adhered to.

So there we have it!  The BBC programme actually admits that no health or safety testing has been done on 5G, while failing to inform the public that this is actually illegal under EU and international law and under the Nuremberg Code and completely ignores the precautionary principle, which is endorsed by the EU in its resolution 1815 of 2011 (see this). A legal opinion given by a Danish law firm states that rolling out 5G is illegal under EU and international law (75 pages; see this):

It is the conclusion of this legal opinion that establishing and activating a 5G-network, as it is currently described, would be in contravention of current human and environmental laws enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, EU regulations, and the Bern- and Bonn-conventions. … This also applies when the radiation remains within the limits recommended by ICNIRP and currently used in Denmark as well as broadly within the EU.

Programme contributors who are actually qualified and justified in demanding health and safety testing of 5G technology prior to its rollout by virtue of (a) a medical qualification and knowledge of this field of medicine, (b) personal experience of the deleterious effects of wireless technology, and (c) legal knowledge, are portrayed as being unreasonable, unbalanced, petty-minded and extreme. No doubt they will soon be characterised as terrorists – watch this [BBC] space!

By contrast, the pro-5G speakers, who have technical but no medical or scientific qualifications or studies carried out in the field of EMFs, are warmly encouraged to expound their vacuous and valueless opinions on the safety of 5G. Each one speaks after each anti-5G speaker in order to undermine whatever they have said, and together they are allotted double the time given to the anti-5G speakers. Subtle cues including choice of language register, vernacular phrases, trivialisation and disparaging intonation are further employed to undermine the anti-5G speakers.

As Gandhi said, “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”. The fake news on 5G emanating from the corrupt telco-industry-funded or -co-opted media outlets in the English-language and foreign media is exposed for what it is: a heavy-handed, pitiful, belated attempt by a greedy telecoms industry – which thought it could roll out 5G on an unsuspecting public without being caught – to compound their contempt for the public by attempting to con them again with blatant lies and manipulation. I have news for you, guys: this genie is not going back in the bottle.

No matter how many times you invite your carefully selected rent-a-sceptic contributors to refute the vast evidence pointing to probable catastrophic consequences from allowing 5G to be rolled out on Earth, in the stratosphere and in space in order to irradiate every inch of the planet with no escape for anyone of any age or health condition, and even unborn fetuses – a plan described by Professor Emeritus Martin Pall as “the stupidest idea in the history of mankind” – and to assert that this overwhelming body of evidence is not “real”, “proven”, “valid”, “solid”, “convincing”, ”conclusive”, or “established”, the public is not going to believe you, BBC.

You can continue blaming the unqualified rejection of 5G by an appalled and outraged public on Russian disinformation in order to deflect attention away from the criminals who planned its rollout and are therefore really responsible for this reckless technological fiasco, but you are on a hiding to nothing.

Your BBC executives, staff and programme contributors had better quickly start adhering to the law and telling the truth or they may soon find themselves held liable for wilful, calculated and malicious conspiracy to aid and abet genocide and ecocide. Top Nazis were hanged for crimes against humanity after the WWII attempted genocide. To my knowledge, no one has yet been tried for conspiracy to commit omnicide. Let us hope that you will forthwith cease and desist from your hubristic and arrogant determination to be among the first.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, will be speaking as part of the upcoming 5G Crisis: Awareness & Accountability Summit, which will be online and free from Monday, August 26 – Sunday, September 1, 2019. Claire worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017 and warned the UN Secretary-General about the dangers of 5G in May 2018, calling for a halt to its rollout at UN duty stationsSince then, she has collaborated with Arthur Firstenberg to publish the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, which is available in 31 languages. The Appeal has attracted over 135,000 individual and group signatories from more than 198 countries. The Appeal is open to everyone to sign – please sign the Appeal now.

Featured image is from End of the American Dream

 

5G Was Tested in Russia on Humans and Animals with Disturbing Results

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2019/08/12/5g-was-tested-in-russia-on-humans-animals-with-disturbing-results-what-you-are-not-being-told-barrie-trower-mark-steele-discuss/

“The USSR experimented on humans and animals with 5G in 1977, 1972 and 1997.  A proper military experiment. The humans suffered metabolic problems, ie everything started to fall apart, blood problems, immune system dysfunction, severe medical and neurological problems. With animals, since they were able to dissect them, they found the bone marrow was suffering (which produces the immune system), respiration damaged, enzyme activity damaged, nuclear dna damaged, and the total exposure time was only 15 hours over 60 days. Roughly 15 minutes a day and the levels were not high. Not as high as you are going to get in a classroom.” …. Dr Barrie Trower


Note: Since posting this people in NZ are asking what can we do? Some suggestions … visit the nz site http://www.5g.org.nz/ … they have addressed what we can do in NZ. Also Mark Steele from the video, he has a website https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/ (save us now) & all the detail on how he fought his council in Gateshead in court & won (article coming on that). Note there is a campaign to discredit him & his work which should tell you something. Please ignore the debunking links you will see when you search.  If there were anything dodgy with this man Dr Barrie Trower would not be teaming up with him for this video interview.  Also visit Josh del Sol’s site, if you go to https://takebackyourpower.net/ you will find his doco of the same name, an excellent although shocking intro to the shonky science we’re dished out on the so called ‘safety’ of emfs/wi-fi particularly relating to smart meters (if you are new to this or have hitherto believed it’s all good, no problems). When you land at that site you will be alerted to an upcoming online series of teaching (free at the viewing times, you can also purchase these for your own reference later). It screens in late August. Lastly Dr Trower has many other interviews on Youtube that will give you insight into how wi-fi is affecting us already. Particularly our children. 5G he illustrates is a military grade weapon they used for crowd control. Fact. (Here is a 14 minute clip with the essentials from him). EWR


THE VIDEO …. (quoting here from Dr Barrie Trower)

“The roll out already started in Vienna, the unsuspecting people immediately suffered from nosebleeds, cardiac problems, chest pains, fatigue, dizziness, vomiting in fact all of the symptoms of microwave sickness … known since 1932.” 

“The USSR experimented on humans and animals with 5G in 1977, 1972 and 1997.  A proper military experiment. The humans suffered metabolic problems, ie everything started to fall apart, blood problems, immune system dysfunction, severe medical and neurological problems. With animals, since they were able to dissect them, they found the bone marrow was suffering (which produces the immune system), respiration damaged, enzyme activity damaged, nuclear dna damaged, and the total exposure time was only 15 hours over 60 days. Roughly 15 minutes a day and the levels were not high. Not as high as you are going to get in a classroom.” …. Dr Barrie Trower

This is such important information here I’ve transcribed half of the video in note form (note particularly there are some words that may not be spelled correctly, you will need to listen for yourself). Transcription below.
Here is some detail about how Dr Barrie Trower is someone we should be listening to about the dangers of wi-fi and in particular 5G.

Barrie Trower
 trained at the Governments Microwave Warfare establishment in 60’s
 worked for the Royal Navy and British Secret Service as a microwave weapons
expert
 helped de-brief spies trained in microwave warfare in the 70’s
 worked in the underwater bomb disposal unit which used microwaves
 has a degree in physics (specialising in microwaves), a research degree and a
diploma in human physiology. SOURCE

Mark Steele
And about Mark Steele, he is a technical weapons expert, patent writer, inventor and nuclear research technology officer. SOURCE  A UK Judge declared Mark Steele as a credible expert and engineer on EMF and GSM technologies. SOURCE

Barrie Trower has come out of retirement to blow the whistle & likewise Mark Steele who (in Barrie’s words) ‘has stuck his head above the parapet‘ to warn people of what is coming. He has taken on the fight & won in Gateshead UK where 5G has been rolled out since 2011.  This interview will shock you. EWR

 

Published on Apr 1, 2019

Mirrored from: Barrie Trower & Mark Steele on 5G https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BAs5… Barry Trower & Mark Steele discuss 5G as a weapon and also answer the confusion relating to Bemri’s visit to Gateshead and how 5G encompasses the Sub Ghz range.

TRANSCRIPT:

(VIDEO-Barrie Trower and Mark Steele on 5G (2019)

350 environmental organizations from 96 countries have said, stop 5G.

WHO advisor came out & said stop 5G

Early on in its development they noted it kills birds, cattle, tadpoles & insects.

California fire fighters have an exemption from 5G because of dangers to their health.

A new weapon they have developed that is stronger than 5G was tested on Special Forces & caused them to drop to their knees.

A Professor of Medicine has said nature has no defense against 5G.

5G will affect our eyes … cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration and kidney problems.

Another Professor has said 5G on lamp posts will cause insect Armageddon because they hover around lamp posts. They won’t survive.

5G has to be compliant because it has to be linked as it has been in other countries, to all radar systems, wi-fi, smart meters, hospital equipment … the internet of things… all have to be compatible. So not just getting 5G but all the other Gs and wi-fi.

The calculations for 5G are time averaged… the data is around a 100x greater than 4G.

The roll out already started in Vienna, the unsuspecting people immediately suffered from nosebleeds, cardiac problems, chest pains, fatigue, dizziness, vomiting in fact all of the symptoms of microwave sickness that Barrie Trower has known since 1932.

The USSR experimented on humans and animals with 5G in 1977, 1972 and 1997.  A proper military experiment. The humans suffered metabolic problems, ie everything started to fall apart, blood problems, immune system dysfunction, severe medical and neurological problems. With animals, since they were able to dissect them, they found the bone marrow was suffering (which produces the immune system), respiration damaged, enzyme activity damaged, nuclear dna damaged, and the total exposure time was only 15 hours over 60 days. Roughly 15 minutes a day and the levels were not high. Not as high as you are going to get in a classroom.

So it has been used as a weapon, and it has been tested experimentally on animals and humans. So yes it is definitely going to make you ill.

Has to have megahertz frequencies to comply with other transmitters & receivers. Also in other countries it has to have the low gigahertz frequencies.

In some countries you have as many as 22 different frequencies when it’s fully functional because it has to comply with all of the other things. It will be added to wi-fi 2,3,4G, smart meters. Its compliance with smart meters is actually quite frightening because each smart meter has to have two transmitters. One low frequency to go into the house & talk to the fridge and the telly etc and one to reach the main transmitter. Each house may have up to 15 appliances. Each small group of houses, goes from 500-5000 houses, in a mesh. When look at the maths… like a little group of tower blocks on a big estate, you can have as many as 5000 smart meters, two transmitters for each smart meters, so you have ten thousand smart meters in a small area transmitting. Each of them (15 per house) so in one reasonably sized council estate can have up to 150,000 transmitters. They are producing the 5G wave forms and wi-fi, 2.4 gigs which is a known weapons frequency. It is known in the military & published, Stanford Institute Research California, did their own experiments and said the two most dangerous frequencies for living cellular structures which is all of nature, trees, animals, insects, humans, is the wi-fi frequency and .95 gigs … a Doctor with 22 years experience in WHO cancer dept. has said that all of this will cause cancer. No question.

5 Gigahertz isn’t 5G, it is a telecom signal frequency. Shows the deceit of these people. It is capable of spying, on every device in your home.

5G has already been here for many years. Rolled out in Gateshead in 2011 & 12. Mark didn’t know until Sept 2016 when LED … the architecture, the equipment 5G’s been attached to is LED streetlights. They’re also part of a weapons system … post modulated, terahertz range lights can be extremely hazardous. The blue phospha coating … professor John O’Hagan has stated these lights are a risk, a risk to biology, a risk to children, a risk to eye sight etc. This is Public Health England. You have American Medical Assn stating the same, Anzi (?) stating the same, and Shia (?) the emerging risk team in Europe stating that flicker, post modulation on these LED street lights is risky. Ask yourself, why are your local authorities at speed, rushing this technology out on top of you when there’s already been identified a double increase in prostrate cancer from the exposure to these blue light systems, phospha coated blue light systems, so what’s going on? These councils are totally disregarding this. Regulatory bodies we pay to protect are still rolling them out. They’re on the motorways. Children are being born today that by the time they’re 25 they won’t be able to see. That’s because the exposure to this type of radiation, non ionized radiation, the secretary of state has a duty of care he’s totally ignoring. The plan is to make sure these people are seen in a court of law to bring them to justice.

This brings you to half way through the video (32 mins in).

 

Video: 5G APOCALYPSE – GATESHEAD EDITION

5G APOCALYPSE – GATESHEAD EDITION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jq8t1wYY8Q

Mark Steele is a weapons expert and a tireless campaigner against 5G,
a lone voice opposing the rollout of 5G in Gateshead, England.
Twice Gateshead Council has tried to silence him.
The video explains that the Strategic Director of Gateshead Council has formal links to
two telecoms companies with a vested interest in 5G.
It also explains that nosebleeds, headaches, nausea and incidents of depression
have occurred since erection of the 5G masts.
Mark says that since 5G was rolled out in 2013,
there has been a massive deterioration in the health status of Gateshead residents.
 Mark tries to deliver notice of legal action against the Council at the Council Offices,
and the staff refuse to accept it and hide from Mark and his team.
 In October 2018, when a German lawyer tried to deliver Dr. Martin Pall’s response to
ICNIRP’s public consultation exercise on their revised guidelines for enabling 5G,
ICNIRP and the German government’s own Federal Office for Radiation Protection
both refused to accept Dr. Pall’s report.
ICNIRP’s guidelines are not protective. They do not acknowledge proven biological effects, but only thermal (heating) effects. ICNIRP’s magical guidelines average values over 6 minutes, thus discounting peak values. It’s like averaging a gunshot to the head over 6 minutes – the bullet could not possibly kill you at that reduced velocity – but it does!
The UN and your government collude with the telecoms industry to endorse these guidelines – issued by an NGO with no status in international law – and thereby collude in enabling the telecoms companies to irradiate you, your children and your planet 24/7 …
with Apple ear buds, with “smart” phones, with WiFi routers, in trains, in trams, in aeroplanes with 28 GHz public access points, from thousands of antennas in phased arrays forming laser-like beams, placed under manhole covers on the street, inside cabinets on the street, on lamp posts, from drones in the stratosphere, from satellites in space.

WE ARE UNDER ATTACK 24/7.
Your body is electric: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm-Ia6vI4PA&t=949s

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a complete breakdown in the rule of law. What we thought were our public servants have been co-opted to serve corporate interests. Your health, your family and your Earth are being sacrificed for those corporate interests to make money.

THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW

STOP 5G!

International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
www.5gspaceappeal.org/

5G Crisis Summit, free to watch from 26.8-1.9.2019
https://the5gsummit.com/?idev_id=26107

5G APOCALYPSE – GATESHEAD EDITION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jq8t1wYY8Q

Mark Steele ist Waffen Experte und unermüdlicher Kämpfer gegen 5G, eine einsame Stimme gegen den rollout von 5G in Gateshead, England. Zweimal hat der Gemeinderat versucht, ihn zum schweigen zu bringen.

Das Video erklärt, dass der Strategische Direktor des Gateshead Council ist formal verbunden mit zwei Telekommunikationsunternehmen mit einem Eigenanteil von 5G.

Mark erklärt auch, dass Nasenbluten, Kopfschmerzen, Übelkeit und Depressionen sind seit der Errichtung der 5G Masten aufgetreten.

Mark sagt, dass seit 5G im Jahr 2013 ausgerollt wurde, es gab eine massive Verschlechterung des Gesundheitszustandes der Bewohner von Gateshead.

 Mark versucht zu liefern, die Ankündigung rechtlicher Schritte gegen den Rat auf dem Rat-Büros, und das Personal weigert sich, es zu akzeptieren und sich vor Mark und seinem Team zu verstecken.

 Im Oktober 2018, als ein deutscher Rechtsanwalt versuchte, Dr. Martin Palls Antwort auf die ICNIRP öffentliche Konsultation zu Ihren überarbeiteten Leitlinien für die Aktivierung von 5G, ICNIRP und das Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz der Bundesregierung beide weigerten sich, Dr. Palls Bericht anzunehmen.

Die Richtlinien der ICNIRP sind nicht schützend. Sie erkennen nicht die nachgewiesenen biologischen Wirkungen an, sondern nur die thermischen (Heizungs -) Wirkungen. Die Werte der magischen ICNIRP-Leitlinien werden auf einem Durchschnitt von 6 Minuten berechnet, also ohne Berücksichtigung der Spitzenwerte. Es ist, als würde man die Durchschnittsgeschwindigkeit einer Kugel auf den Kopf über 6 Minuten berechnet – die Kugel könnte Sie nicht bei dieser reduzierten Geschwindigkeit töten – aber doch so ist es!

Die UNO und Ihre Regierung schließen sich der Telekom-industrie an, um diese Leitlinien – die von einer NGO ohne rechtlichen internationale Status herausgegeben wurden – zu unterstützen und damit Telekom-Unternehmen in die Lage zu versetzen, Sie, Ihre Kinder und Ihren Planeten rund um die Uhr, 7 Tage die Woche, zu strahlen …

mit Apple Earbuds, mit “smart” Handys, mit WiFi-Routern, in Zügen, in Straßenbahnen, in Flugzeugen mit 28 GHz öffentlichen Zugangspunkten, von tausenden von Antennen in phased arrays die machen laserähnliche Strahlen, unter Kanaldeckeln und in Schränkeauf der Straße platziert, auf Laternen Pfosten, von Drohnen in der Stratosphäre, von Satelliten im Weltraum.

WIR WERDEN 24/7 ANGEGRIFFEN.

Ihr Körper ist elektrisch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm-Ia6vI4PA&t=949s

Meine Damen und Herren, wir haben einen völligen Zusammenbruch der Rechtsstaatlichkeit.Was wir dachten, waren unsere Beamten wurden zusammengesetzt, um Unternehmensinteressen zu dienen. Ihre Gesundheit, Ihre Familie und Ihre Erde werden für diese Unternehmensinteressen geopfert, um Geld zu verdienen.

DIE ZEIT ZUM HANDELN IST JETZT

STOP 5G !

Internationaler Appell: Stopp von 5G auf der Erde und im Weltraum
www.5gspaceappeal.org/

5G Crisis Summit, gratis zum sehen 26.8-1.9.2019
https://the5gsummit.com/?idev_id=26107

5G APOCALYPSE – GATESHEAD EDITION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jq8t1wYY8Q

Mark Steele est expert en armes et militant infatigable contre la 5G,
une seule voix s’opposant au déploiement de la 5G à Gateshead, en Angleterre.
Deux fois, le Conseil de Gateshead a essayé de le faire taire.
La vidéo explique que le Directeur Stratégique du Conseil de Gateshead a des liens formels avec deux entreprises de télécommunications ayant un intérêt direct dans la 5G.
Elle explique aussi que les saignements de nez, les maux de tête, les nausées et les incidents de dépression se sont produits depuis l’érection des mâts de 5G.
Mark dit que depuis que la 5G a été déployée en 2013, l’état de santé des résidents de Gateshead s’est considérablement détérioré.
 Mark essaie de livrer une action en justice contre le Conseil dans les bureaux du Conseil, et le personnel refuse de l’accepter et se cache de Mark et de son équipe.
 En octobre 2018, lorsqu’un avocat allemand a tenté de livrer la réponse du Dr Martin Pall à l’exercice de consultation publique de l’ICNIRP sur ses lignes directrices révisées pour permettre le déploiement de la 5G. l’ICNIRP et l’Office fédéral de protection contre la radiation (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz) du gouvernement allemand, tous deux ont refusé d’accepter le rapport du Dr Pall.

Les lignes directrices de l’ICNIRP ne sont pas protectrices.Elles ne reconnaissent pas les effets biologiques prouvés, mais seulement les effets thermiques (de chauffage). Les valeurs des lignes directrices magiques de l’ICNIRP sont calculées sur une moyenne de 6 minutes, donc sans tenir compte des valeurs de pointe. C’est comme si on calculait la moyenne de la vitesse d’un tir sur la tête pendant 6 minutes – la balle ne pourrait pas vous tuer à cette vitesse réduite – mais c’est bien le cas!

L’ONU et votre gouvernement s’associent à l’industrie des télécoms pour endosser ces lignes directrices – émises par une ONG sans statut juridique international – et donc permettent aux entreprises de télécommunications de vous irradier, ainsi que vos enfants et votre planète, 24 heures sur 24, 7 jours sur 7 …

avec des Earbuds Apple, avec des « smart » phones, avec des routeurs WiFi, dans les trains, dans les tramways, dans les avions avec des points d’accès publics à 28 GHz, à partir de milliers d’antennes pointant simultanément de multiples faisceaux d’ondes électromagnétiques, analogues aux faisceaux laser, placés sous des couvercles de regard sur la rue (et explicitement placés sur le trottoir), à l’intérieur d’armoires sur la rue, sur des lampadaires, à partir de drones dans la stratosphère, à partir de satellites dans l’espace …

Votre corps est électrique: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm-Ia6vI4PA&t=949s

Mesdames et Messieurs, nous assistons à l’effondrement de l’État de droit. Ce que nous pensions être nos fonctionnaires ont été cooptés pour servir les intérêts commerciaux. Votre santé, votre famille et votre Terre sont sacrifiés au profit de ces entreprises.

NOUS SOMMES ATTAQUÉS 24H / 24.

STOP 5G !

Appel international demandant l’arrêt

du déploiement de la 5G sur Terre et dans l’espace
www.5gspaceappeal.org/

5G Crisis Summit, regarder gratuitement 26.8-1.9.2019
https://the5gsummit.com/?idev_id=26107

The 5G (wireless) Crisis Summit

Join me for The 5G (wireless) Crisis Summit!

This is a special message from Patrick Wood, Editor of Technocracy.News and founder of Coherent Publishing, LLC Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
40d45f5c-162c-4322-8e4d-af2254850d54.jpg
Dear Friend,
5G wireless…The industry HAS NOT shown it to be safe for your health or privacy — yet THOUSANDS of peer-reviewed, independent studies show the risks it presents — and they’re building it anyway.

Hundreds of scientists from 40 different countries have reached out to the United Nations and the FCC, asking them to consider health risks and environmental issues before rapidly deploying 5G — because these researchers have studies that show adverse biological and health effects from EMF sources.

It’s time to better understand the dangers of 5G and learn how to implement better solutions in your community!

—>>Learn more about the dangers of 5G wireless when you attend this free, online event!

WHY ATTEND?

You may have heard of 5G, it stands for fifth-generation cellular wireless. In a February 2019 US Senate hearing, the wireless industry was forced to admit they have no safety studies on 5G, and don’t plan to do any.

Meanwhile, there are thousands of independent studies concluding that wireless radiation causes biological harm.

Despite this, the wireless industry is working with government to deploy 5G — it’s a global, for-profit, human experiment… without our consent.

What does it mean? 5G is a higher frequency, therefore it travels shorter distances than our current wireless signals, therefore exponentially more transmission devices must be installed to provide connectivity — millions more, in fact, on lamp posts, telephone poles and other “rights-of-way” for existing utilities. Each tower will emit radiation at levels known to cause cancer, sterility, DNA damage and other harm… especially to our children, who are most at risk.

Join us at the 5G Crisis summit to discover:
● 5G defined: research, facts and awareness
● Science about the dangers of 5G and EMF radiation
● Sources of wireless radiation and “dirty electricity” in your home
● Link between 5G, Al and global surveillance
● How groups and individuals are successfully opposing 5G
● Simple, empowering actions you can take, here and now
● Individual solutions and safer, revolutionary technologies
● And more!

Your guides for this event are Josh del Sol and Sayer Ji, two iconic health advocates who are known for changing the way we view and achieve improved health and happiness.

If you’re hungry for cutting-edge information with life-saving consequences, and want to be part of a movement dedicated to empowering ourselves and humanity, join us for this event!

—>>I’ll see you online at The 5G Crisis Summit when you register today!
Yours for Liberty,

Patrick Wood
Editor and Author
Technocracy.News

P.S. When you register for The 5G Crisis Summit, you also gain access to this powerful report, 7 Essential Ways to Make Your Home Safe from 5G and EMF Radiation.

Copyright © 2019 Coherent Publishing, LLC, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Coherent Publishing, LLC
P.O. Box 52247
Mesa, AZ 85208

open.php?u=618b293006fe51df78c0a451d&id=e118a59188&e=d9aad2f443

US Scientist Criticizes ICNIRP’s Refusal to Reassess Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Guidelines after US National Toxicology Program Studies Show Clear Evidence of Cancer in Experimental Animals

US Scientist Criticizes ICNIRP’s Refusal to Reassess Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Guidelines after US National Toxicology Program Studies Show “Clear Evidence of Cancer” in Experimental Animals.

Ronald L. Melnick Ph.D Senior Scientist (retired), National Toxicology Program, NIEHS, NIH has issued this scientific  critique of ICNIRPs dismissal of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) findings. On September 4, 2018 ICNIRP   issued a “Note on Recent Animal Studies” that concluded the 28 million dollar US National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences study did “not provide a reliable basis” for changing the over two decades old ICNIRP guidelines on radiofrequency- cell phones and wireless – radiation. In response, Dr. Ronald Melnick went through the ICNIRP document point by point and presented the data to show the document has “numerous false and misleading statements.”

Peer Reviewed and Published 

The critique below comes directly after Dr. Ron Melnick published a paper documenting the “unfounded criticisms” of the NTP  entitled, “Commentary on the Utility of the National Toxicology Program Study on Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation Data for Assessing Human Health Risks Despite Unfounded Criticisms Aimed at Minimizing the Findings of Adverse Health Effects”  in the peer reviewed journal Environmental Research (Pubmed link, ScienceDirect with Full PDF.)

Two Additional Notes

The Ramazzini Institute Director of Research Dr. Fiorella Belpoggi  also posted comments on the ICNIRP   note stating that, “both NTP and RI studies were well performed, no bias affecting the results. ICNIRP confirms that,” and “We are scientists, our role is to produce solid evidence for hazard and risk assessment. Underestimating the evidence from carcinogen bioassays and delays in regulation have already proven many times to have severe consequences, as in the case of asbestos, smoking and vinyl chloride.” (Ramazzini Institute Statement on ICNIRP Note)

A paper was just published by scientists stating that radio frequency radiation can cause cancer based on the human and animal evidence. The NTP study was highlighted in the research review.  Read it here Cancer Epidemiology Update, following the 2011 IARC Evaluation of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (Monograph 102)” 

Critique of the ICNIRP Note of September 4, 2018 Regarding Recent Animal Carcinogenesis Studies

Ronald L. Melnick Ph.D Senior Scientist (retired), National Toxicology Program, NIEHS, NIH

September 12, 2018

 

The International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP, 2018) recently issued a report (dated September 4, 2018) that contains numerous false and misleading statements, particularly those about the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies on cell phone radiofrequency radiation by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP). This flawed analysis by ICNIRP served as the basis for ICNIRP  to support their conclusion that existing radiofrequency exposure guidelines do not need to be revised despite new evidence showing that exposure to cell phone radiofrequency radiation (RFR) causes cancers in experimental animals. ICNIRP also does not take into account evidence on other harmful effects of cellphone radiation including damage to brain DNA, reduced pup birth weights, and decreased sperm quality.

The number of extensive incorrect and misleading statements in this ICNIRP document includes the following:

1) The ICNIRP statement that “the NTP reports have not yet undergone full peer–review” is wrong; the NTP reports on cell phone RFR underwent multiple peer reviews, including an unprecedented 3-day independent review more than five months earlier in March 2018.

2) The ICNIRP statement that many endpoints presented in the NTP reports were not defined “a priori” is also wrong. All of the endpoints presented in the NTP reports were specified in the Statement of Work for the conduct of the NTP studies that was developed during my tenure at NTP.

3) ICNIRP incorrectly states many critical conclusions from the NTP studies (NTP 2018a, 2018b). The peer review panel in March 2018 (NTP 2018c) concluded that there was “clear evidence” of carcinogenic activity for heart schwannomas in male rats exposed to GSM- or CDMA-modulated RFR, “some evidence” of carcinogenic activity for brain gliomas in male rats (both GSM and CDMA), and “equivocal evidence” for heart schwannomas in female rats (both GSM and CDMA). These categories of evidence are defined in all NTP technical reports: some evidence of carcinogenic activity means that the test agent caused an increased incidence in neoplasms, but “the strength of the response was less than that required for clear evidence.” Equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity means that there was “a marginal increase in neoplasms that may be test-agent related.” Therefore, any analysis of the NTP data must include the brain gliomas and the heart schwannomas; the ICNIRP report excluded consideration of the RFR-induced gliomas.

4) The statement by ICNIRP that animals in the NTP study were exposed “over the whole of their lives” is incorrect. Surviving animals were killed at about 110 weeks of age; e.g., more than 70% of mice were still alive at the end of the study (NTP 2018a, 2018b).

5) The ICNIRP report criticized the exposure intensities used in the NTP studies as being “75 times higher than the whole-body exposure limit for the general public” and therefore “not able to inform on mobile-phone radiofrequency exposures.” This issue had been raised before by others and is addressed in my paper (Melnick, 2018):

“While the exposure limit to RFR for the general population in the US is 0.08 W/kg averaged over the whole body, the localized exposure limit is 1.6 W/kg averaged over any one gram of tissue (FCC, 1997); for occupational exposures, the limit is five times higher (0.4 W/kg and 8 W/kg, respectively). Thus, the whole-body exposure levels in the NTP study were higher than the FCC’s whole-body exposure limits (3.8 to 15 times higher than the occupational whole-body exposure limit). Whole-body SAR, however, provides little information about organ-specific exposure levels (IARC, 2013). When an individual uses a cell phone and holds it next to his or her head, body tissues located nearest to the cell phone antenna receive much higher exposures than parts of the body that are located distant from the antenna. Consequently, the localized exposure level is more important for understanding and assessing human health risks from cell phone RFR. When considering organ-specific risk (e.g., risk to the brain) from cell phone RFR, the important measure of potential human exposure is the local SAR value of 1.6 W/kg (the FCC’s SAR limit for portable RF transmitters in the US, FCC 1997) averaged over any gram of tissue. In the NTP study in which animals were exposed to whole-body RFR at SARs of 1.5, 3, and 6.0 W/kg, exposures in the brain were within 10% of the whole-body exposure levels. Consider the converse scenario. If the brain and whole-body exposures were limited to 0.08 W/kg, then localized exposures in humans from use of cell phones held next to the ear could be 20 times greater than exposures to the brain of rats in the NTP study. Under this condition, a negative study would be uninformative for evaluating organ-specific human health risks associated with exposure to RFR. Therefore, exposure intensities in the brains of rats in the NTP study were similar to or only slightly higher than potential, localized human exposures resulting from cell phones held next to the head, and lower than the FCC’s permissible localized limit for occupational exposures.”

6) The claim by ICNIRP that the whole-body exposures in the NTP study can produce adverse health effects is without foundation; the animals tolerated the exposure levels used in the NTP study without significant effects on body temperature, body weights, or induction of tissue damage (NTP 2018a, 2018b). The current RF exposure guidelines from the Federal Communication Commission, which are similar to those of ICNIRP, are based on a whole-body SAR of 4 W/kg, in order to ‘protect’ against adverse effects that might occur due to increases in tissue or body temperature of 1OC or higher from acute exposures. The whole-body exposure limit of 0.4 W/kg SAR for occupational exposures and 0.08 W/kg SAR for the general public is based simply on dividing the 4W/kg value by 10 for occupational exposures and by 50 for the general public, while the exposure guideline limit for localized exposures in the US is 1.6 W/kg averaged over any one gram of tissue for the general population and 8 W/kg for occupational exposures (FCC, 1997) is based simply on multiplying the whole-body exposure limits by 20. For localized exposures, the ICNIRP guideline is 2 W/kg averaged over any 10 grams of contiguous tissue for the general population, and 10 W/kg for occupational exposures.  The NTP thermal pilot study showed that rats and mice could maintain body temperatures within 1OC at 6 W/kg and 10 W/kg, respectively (Wyde et al., 2018). Thus, the exposures used in the NTP study are consistent with FCC and ICNIRP guidelines that limit whole body exposures to levels that do not cause any significant temperature increase. The 10x or 50x uncertainty factors applied to the 4 W/kg SAR are aimed at minimizing potential acute thermal effects, but do not address health risks from non-thermal or minimally thermal exposures. The ICNIRP report also criticized the use of subcutaneously implanted transponders to monitor the effects of RF exposure on core body temperature; however, Kort et al. (1998) showed that temperature changes recorded by the subcutaneous transponders did not differ significantly from rectal temperature measurements in rats or mice.

7) Criticism by ICNIRP concerning the consistency between the NTP studies (NTP 2018a) and the Ramazzini study (Falcioni et al., 2018) is disingenuous. The fact that both studies carried out in independent laboratories in Italy and the U.S. found increased incidences of heart schwannomas and Schwann cell hyperplasias in Sprague-Dawley rats under different exposure environments and different RF intensity levels is  remarkable. Without knowledge or analysis of the true dose-response relationship between RFR exposure and the induction of schwannomas and Schwann cell hyperplasias of the heart, it is unreasonable to expect a linear dose-response by combining data from these two separate studies.

8) The discussion by ICNIRP concerning the “expected ratio’” of about 30% for schwannomas to hyperplasias is based on the paper by Novilla et al., 1991, and is a misrepresentation of the data and its relevance to the NTP study on cell phone RFR. In the Novilla paper, there were zero hyperplasias and zero schwannomas among 100 male Sprague-Dawley rats (there was one hyperplasia and one schwannoma in female Sprague Dawley rats). Most of the spontaneous hyperplasias and schwannomas reported in that paper were observed in Wistar rats (ratio ~ 3). However, even if there had been a difference in the ratio of spontaneous hyperplasias to schwannomas in that study, it still would not reflect the impact of cell phone RFR on that ratio. The fact that Novilla et al. did not see either hyperplasias or schwannomas in male Sprague-Dawley rats lends further credibility to the absence of these lesions in the NTP study in Sprague-Dawley rats and the increased incidences of schwannomas in exposed rats being due to the exposures to cell phone RFR.

9) It is noteworthy that ICNIRP cites two reviews that conclude there is no association between RFR and acoustic neuromas, while ignoring any mention of the IARC monograph (IARC, 2013) that reported positive associations between RFR from cell phone and glioma and acoustic neuroma in humans.

10) The issue raised by ICNIRP on the lack of cardiac schwannomas in control male rats in the NTP study and the expected incidence (0-2%) based on historical control rates had been raised before by others and is addressed in my paper (Melnick, 2018) for both schwannomas and gliomas:

“Gliomas and schwannomas of the heart are uncommon tumors that occur rarely in control Sprague-Dawley rats. It is not unusual to observe a zero incidence of uncommon tumors in groups of 50-90 control rats. In experimental carcinogenicity studies, the most important control group is the concurrent control group. As mentioned above, the uniquely designed reverberation chambers used in the NTP study were fully shielded from external EMFs, and the lighting source was incandescent instead of fluorescent light bulbs. The housing of rats in the RFR shielded reverberation chambers could affect tumor rates in control animals. No data are available on expected tumor rates in control rats of the same strain (Hsd: Sprague Dawley rats) held under these specific environmental conditions. Thus, historical control data from previous NTP studies are not reliably informative for comparison to the results obtained in the cell phone RFR study.”

11) The hypothetical argument raised by ICNIRP about the effect of one additional schwannoma in the control group is nonsense; one must analyze the available data rather than inserting arbitrary values to downplay the significance of a true response.

12) The discussion in the ICNIRP concerning survival differences between controls and exposure groups affecting the relative tumor response had been raised before by others and is addressed in my paper (Melnick, 2018)

“This comment is an inaccurate portrayal and interpretation of the data for at least two reasons: (1) there was no statistical difference in survival between control male rats and the exposure group with the highest rate of gliomas and heart schwannomas (CDMA-exposed male rats, SAR = 6.0 W/kg), and (2) no glial cell hyperplasias (potential precancerous lesions) or heart schwannomas were observed in any control rat, even though glial cell hyperplasia was detected in exposed rats as early at week 58 of the 2-year study and heart schwannoma was detected as early as week 70 in exposed rats. Thus, survival was sufficient to detect tumors or pre-cancerous lesions in the brain and heart of control rats.”

13) The issue in the ICNIRP report about the need for blind pathology to avoid biases related to exposure status is discussed in my paper (Melnick, 2018).

“The reviews of the histopathology slides and final diagnoses of lesions in the RFR studies by the pathology working groups were conducted similar to all other NTP studies in that the pathologists did not know whether the slides they were examining came from an exposed or an unexposed animal (Maronpot and Boorman, 1982). In fact, the reviewing pathologists didn’t even know that the test agent was RFR. For anyone questioning the diagnosis of any tissue in this study, all of the slides are available for examination at the NTP archives.”

Also, the designations ‘test agent A’ and ‘test agent B’ refer to the separate studies of GSM and CDMA exposures and not to exposure status within a study. Therefore, these designations would not “result in bias because perceived patterns within a group’s samples can affect how subsequent samples are evaluated.”

14) The issue of multiple comparisons leading to possible false positives (with a probability of 0.5) was addressed by the NTP in its release of the partial findings of the RFR study (NTP, 2016):

“Although the NTP conducts statistical tests on multiple cancer endpoints in any given study, numerous authors have shown that the study-wide false positive rate does not greatly exceed 0.05 (Fears et al., 1977; Haseman,1983; Office of Science and Technology Policy,1985; Haseman, 1990; Haseman and Elwell, 1996; Lin and Rahman, 1998; Rahman and Lin, 2008; Kissling et al., 2014). One reason for this is that NTP’s carcinogenicity decisions are not based solely on statistics and in many instances statistically significant findings are not concluded to be due to the test agent. Many factors go in to this determination including whether there were pre-neoplastic lesions, whether there was a dose-response relationship, biological plausibility, background rates and variability of the tumor, etc. Additionally, with rare tumors especially, the actual false positive rate of each individual test is well below 0.05, due to the discrete nature of the data, so the cumulative false positive rate from many such tests is less than a person would expect by multiplying 0.05 by the number of tests conducted (Fears et al., 1977; Haseman, 1983; Kissling et al., 2015).”

15) The conclusion in the ICNIRP report that the NTP study is not consistent with the RFR cancer literature is wrong, and the claim by ICNIRP that epidemiological studies have not found evidence for cardiac schwannomas neglects to note that no studies of cell phone users have examined relationships between RFR exposure to the heart and risk of cardiac schwannomas. While it is true that the NTP did not report an increase in vestibular schwannomas in rats, it must be recognized that the vestibular nerve was not examined microscopically.  The NTP findings of significantly increased incidences and/or trends for gliomas and glial cell hyperplasias in the brain and schwannomas and Schwann cell hyperplasias in the heart of exposed male rats are most important because the IARC classified RFR as a “possible human carcinogen” based largely on increased risks of gliomas and acoustic neuromas (which are Schwann cell tumors on the acoustic nerve) among long term users of cell phones. The concordance between rats and humans in cell type affected by RFR is remarkable and strengthens the animal-to-human association.

 

Based on numerous incorrect and misleading claims, the ICNIRP report concludes that “these studies (NTP and Ramazzini) do not provide a reliable basis for revising the existing radiofrequency exposure guidelines.” The data on gliomas of the brain and schwannomas of the heart induced by cell phone radiation are suitable for conducting a quantitative risk assessment and subsequent re-evaluation of health-based exposure limits. The ‘P’ in ICNIRP stands for Protection. One must wonder who this commission is trying to protect – evidently, it is not public health.

Ronald L. Melnick Ph.D

References

Falcioni, L., Bua L., Tibaldi, E., Lauriola, M., DeAngelis, L., Gnudi, F., Mandrioli, D., Manservigi, M., Manservisi, F., Manzoli, I., Menghetti, I., Montella, R., Panzacchi, S., Sgargi, D., Strollo, V., Vornoli, A., Belpoggi, F. 2018. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz base station environmental emission. Environ. Res. 165, 496-503.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 1997. Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. OET Bulletin 65. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2013. IARC Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Lyon, France, Volume 102.

ICNIRP (2018) International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection. https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPnote2018.pdf

Kort, W.J., Hekking-Weijma, J.M., TenKate, M.T., Sorm, V., VanStrik, R.  1998. A microchip implant system as a method to determine body temperature of terminally ill rats and mice. Lab Anim. 32: 260-269.

Maronpot, R.R., Boorman, G.A. 1982. Interpretation of rodent hepatocellular proliferative alterations and hepatocellular tumors in chemical safety assessment. Tox. Pathol. 10, 71-80.

Melnick, R.L. 2018. Commentary on the utility of the National Toxicology Program Study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation data for assessing human health risks despite unfounded criticisms aimed at minimizing the findings of adverse health effects. Environ. Res. (in press).

National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2016. Report of partial findings from the National Toxicology Program carcinogenesis studies of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD rats (whole body exposures).

http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/06/23/055699.full.pdf

National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2018a. NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. NTP TR 595 (in final preparation).

National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2018b. NTP technical report on the toxicology and

carcinogenesis studies in B6C3F1/N mice exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (1,900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones.  NTP TR 596 (in final preparation).

National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2018c. Peer review of the draft NTP technical reports on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.

https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/peerreview20180328_508.pdf

Wyde, M.E., Horn, T.L., Capstick, M.H., Ladbury, J.M., Koepke, G., Wilson, P.F., Kissling,

G.E., Stout, M.D., Kuster, N., Melnick, R.L., Gauger, J., Bucher, J.R., and McCormick, D.L. 2018. Effect of cell phone radiofrequency radiation on body temperature in rodents: Pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program’s reverberation chamber exposure system. Bioelectromagnetics 39, 190-199.

Dr. Ronald L. Melnick  served as a toxicologist for 28+ years at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP), before retiring in 2009. Dr. Melnick received his B.S. from Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and his M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He was a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Physiology-Anatomy at the University of California in Berkeley and then an assistant professor of Life Sciences at the Polytechnic Institute of New York. At NTP/NIEHS, Dr. Melnick was involved in the design, monitoring and interpretation of toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of numerous environmental and occupational agents including 1,3-butadiene, chloroprene, isoprene, water disinfection byproducts, etc. He led the design of the NTP carcinogenicity studies of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in rodents. In addition, his research has focused on the use of mechanistic data in assessing human health risks of environmental chemicals. He was manager of the NIEHS Experimental Toxicology Unit, Carcinogenesis and Toxicology Evaluation Branch, and group leader of the NIEHS Toxicokinetics and Biochemical Modeling Group, in the Laboratory of Computational Biology and Risk Analysis. He spent one year as an agency representative at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to work on interagency assessments of health risks of environmental agents and on risk assessment research needs in the Federal government. Dr. Melnick has organized several national and international symposiums and workshops on health risks associated with exposure to toxic and carcinogenic agents, and he has served on numerous scientific review boards and advisory panels, including those of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. He is a fellow (emeritus) of the Collegium Ramazzini. Dr. Melnick is the recipient of the American Public Health Association’s 2007 David P. Rall Award for sciencebased advocacy in public health.

Stop 5G News: Seventh issue of the Stop 5G Space Appeal Newsletter

Stop 5G News – 27 July 2019

Seventh issue of the Stop 5G Space Appeal Newsletter

ACTION: 1st of every month: Disconnect Day – no MW/MMW devices to be used!
ACTION: premier jour de chaque mois: jour déconnecté
AKTION: jeder erste des Monats stop mit Ihrem Handy und wifi router

Mostly in English, but items also in French, German. and some other languages. Note: this newsletter is A5 so if you print, choose setting “Fit to page” or similar.
To translate articles or websites, drop text or URL into Yandex Translate at https://translate.yandex.com/translate.

Meistens in Englisch, aber auch in Französisch, Deutsch und einige andere Sprachen. Hinweis: dieser Newsletter ist A5, also wenn Sie es drucken, wählen Sie “Zur Seite passen” oder ähnliches. Um Artikel oder websites zu übersetzen, drop text oder URL in Yandex Translate at https://translate.yandex.com/translate

Pour la plupart en anglais, mais aussi en français, en allemand et quelques autres langues. Note: ce bulletin est A5; donc si vous l’imprimez, choisissez “Ajuster à la page” ou similaire. Pour traduire des articles ou des sites Web, déposez du texte ou une URL dans Yandex Translate à https://translate.yandex.com/translate

International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
www.5gspaceappeal.org/

Stop 5G News 27 July 2019.pdf

Take Action Tuesday – the DIGIT Act – Steamrolling on 5G!

The Senate and Big Wireless Are Ready to Steamroll on 5G.

Who: U. S. Senate Commerce Committee
What: Hearing on S1611 – the “Developing Innovation and Internet of Things” (“DIGIT”) Act.
When: Wednesday, July 10th, 10:00 am
The Digit Act sets up a working group and steering committee within government that identifies and addresses any regulations, programs, or agency barriers to the deployment of 5G and the Internet of Things. Read the bill here.

In advance of the hearing, we’re asking you to call the offices of Senator John Thune and Senator Brian Schatz, co-chairs of the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, Innovation, and the Internet.
Senator Thune: (202) 224-2321
Senator Schatz: (202) 224-3934

(see script ideas below)

If your own senator sits on the Commerce Committee, please call him/her as well. We must keep the pressure on our elected officials to do what’s right and protect public health before corporate profit.
Sample Script
(Try to get as much of this in as you can before they stop you!)Hello, I’m calling to voice strong opposition to S1611, the DIGIT ACT, because of the scientifically proven health effects associated with long-term exposure to wireless radiation emitted by “small cell” antennas located close to homes, apartments, schools and businesses, which are required for the deployment of 5G.

The Senator needs to be aware of the honest science, not just take the word of telecom companies that there is no risk to the public from 24/7 exposure to wireless radiation.

Fiber-optic cable is much faster, more reliable, secure and completely safe. We don’t need, or want, powerful 5G wireless antennas going up in our neighborhoods, and the Senator should not be voting to use taxpayer dollars to promote the interests of the telecom industry over the well-being and security of the American people!

Thank you.

Thanks to your enthusiastic support, we are making progress informing the public about 5G and other wireless technologies, creating a wave of public opinion that is more powerful than the giant telecom industry.

Thanks for all you are doing!

– The 5G Crisis Team

DONATE
Copyright © Grassroots Communications Inc.
All rights reserved.
Email us at:
report

open.php?u=c3128cbc75b5968aacd624e4b&id=deca5c2be2&e=0d4e3982f9

Measuring Microwave Radiation Levels at Microwave Oven – LIVE – 1 of 2

A visual to demonstrate microwave radiation.

Part 2: Measuring EMF from WiFi Router

This is the same that emits from wireless devices.

For comparison purposes, the Building Biology precautionary guidelines show levels in excess of 1000 microWatts per square meter to be in the “extreme concern” category, you will see that levels measured here reach the max on the EMF meter which is 100 times this level! While there are thousands of peer-reviewed, published, scientific studies showing harm to all living beings on the planet – especially to our children, I invite you to consider how a potato cooks inside a microwave oven… The water molecules inside the potato are agitated or “excited” and the heat that is generated cooks it from the inside out. Now consider this: we are made up mostly water. Children hold more water than adults and absorb up to 10x the amount of radiation than adults. SO, think about how your children are being zapped inside their classrooms from all the microwave devices inside (commercial-grade routers, laptops, iPads, white boards, VR headsets, and the load increases if cell phones are allowed inside the classroom). The radiation is cumulative – causes DNA damage and permeates developing blood-brain barriers and thinner skulls in children.

Girls are born with all the eggs they will ever have. The radiation passes through the child and into the eggs as well.

Boys are impacted when they have laptops on their laps, and anyone who may carry cell phones in pockets and when cell phones are held to head, the brain is being irradiated as well – the thyroid is impacted too.

TIME TO INSIST THAT YOUR SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEES WIRE THE CLASSROOMS? — and, NOT ENTER INTO CELL TOWER LEASES FOR TOWERS OR ANTENNAS ON SCHOOL BUILDINGS OR ON SCHOOL GROUNDS?

If you enjoyed this video, kindly LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, COMMENT and SHARE – many thanks for visiting!

RELATED LINKS

EMF-Portal The core of the EMF-Portal is an extensive literature database with an inventory of 28,521 publications and 6,366 summaries of individual scientific studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields. https://www.emf-portal.org/en

Health Effects of Digital Technology by PHYSICIANS FOR SAFE TECHNOLOGY https://mdsafetech.org/

Jimmy Gonzalez “Cell Phones Cause Cancer” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIlOV…

It’s time to EMF off! What is electro-sensitivity and why are so many people getting sick? In this powerful four-minute video, Lewis Evans explains how the microwave radiation in our environment (from Wi-Fi, cell towers, mobile phones and other wireless devices) is affecting our health, brains, environment, food supply and viability as a species. Four minutes that could save your life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHbYE…

How to Set Up a Low-EMF Internet Connection https://www.emfanalysis.com/

Wireless wake-up call – Jeromy Johnson – TEDxBerkeley https://www.youtube.com/embed/F0NEaPT…

RADIATION EDUCATION: Information on the Biological Effects of Chronic Microwave Exposure in Schools and the Environment; The Psychological Problems Associated with Screen & Cell Phone Addiction http://www.wirelesswatchblog.org/

Turn It Off 4 Kids Initiative Toolkit http://www.nacst.org/turn-it-off-4-ki…

The Implications of Wireless Radiation in Schools http://nebula.wsimg.com/1e280b71f8d6b…

Does your child have symptoms of Wi-Fi exposure at school? http://nebula.wsimg.com/a18e5b6de4734…

US High School Student Calls for Answers on Wireless Radiation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnRGR…

UK House of Commons Debate on Health Effects of 5G and Wireless Radiation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdQgw…

Acoustimeter RF Meter Video (the EMF meter used in this video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4ZjU…

EMR Exposure Guidelines https://slt.co/Education/EMR-Exposure…

Microwave Radiation Exposure produced by iPad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLCi4…

Wi-Fi in Schools Causes Cancer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLCi4…

AT&T Fires Up Sweat-Inducing 5G

AT&T Fires Up Sweat-Inducing 5G in “Sin City” With Plans for 20 More Despite Anticipating More Lawsuits

 

JUNE 30, 2019
Last February, telecom executives gave congressional testimony that they could NOT provide any studies that prove that 5G technology is safe.  Unfortunately, plenty of research already proves it isn’t (see 1, 2, 3).

Not only that – cybersecurity experts, (see 1, 2), environmentalists (see 1, 2, 3) meteorologists, NASA, NOAA, the U.S. Navy, and utility companies have ALL warned that installing 5G everywhere could lead to widespread catastrophic events.

Regardless, AT&T is introducing 5G in more U.S. cities despite this  as well as growing 5G opposition and that Americans ARE NOT signing up for it where it’s already been installed.

Even ballsier, the company is doing this while fighting current lawsuits AND they are anticipating more lawsuits will follow.  Of course, all telecom companies have been anticipating lawsuits for awhile now.

Now back to 5G in Vegas:

AT&T’s 5G network is continuing to grow, though it still remains limited to business users.

On Thursday the wireless carrier announced that it has turned on 5G in Las Vegas, its twentieth city to get its 5G mmWave network (what AT&T calls “5G+”).

[…]

At twenty live cities, AT&T has grown a sizeable, early lead on Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprintthough all three rival carriers either have launched consumer 5G networks or plan to do so this week.

It is bonkers crazy, and some elected officials are still endorsing 5G and forcing installation on Americans even when few residents are signing up for it.

Activist Post reports regularly about all the horrors of 5G.  Please see our archives.

For more information, visit the following websites:

High Radiation Levels in Schools NEEDS Your Attention ASAP!

Neighbors Organizing Against Trespassing Technology

Do you know the radiation and dirty electricity measurements at your child’s school where they spend 7 to 8 hours a day?

In the primary document here, An URGENT Message for Modern Man ~ 2019, I shared several credible links on high radiation levels in schools.  There are some VERY CONCERNING issues of high-powered routers, cell towers on the property or nearby, and dirty electricity which all can be measured and should be measured since you can’t smell or taste this toxin. Of most concern is that there are reports of teacher’s passing out, kids bleeding from their ears and noses and NO INCIDENT REPORTS WERE ALLOWED BY THE SCHOOLS.  Hello?  Are you okay with that?

Here’s the YouTube video of one teacher’s testimony:

Click here to view this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wghaMbzRnb4

For the second time those links have been pulled…the entire site gone this time whereas before the page was…

View original post 338 more words

InPower Community Update: June 2019

What we are dealing with needs to be understood by as many as possible- though not everyone.

The ‘higher’ the understanding, the more effective we will be as a whole, but again, not everyone has to grasp everything.

Action is definitely a key, and through action, people start to change internally.

A big part of what needs to happen is the ‘group mind’ or the ‘flocking principle’, where the whole becomes more than the sum of the parts. To that end, we are building a platform for this to be realized on a worldwide scale.  When we can interact, collaborate, teach, help, love one another-  there is nothing that can stop it.

It is not about fighting.  It is becoming who we are meant to be, and that displaces anything contrary, no matter what it is or how long it’s been here, or how much so-called ‘money’ is behind it.

May 2019 has been ground-breaking:  we have launched the first automated Beta version of our NoL Creator application for a group (which had been held at Round 3), and they have now been moved into the billing Rounds!

Also, we launched the UK smart meter NoL!

The Vaccine Choice NoL has a dedicated group completing its research and will be soon ready to go into final formatting for the Beta system, as well as the first draft of the Geo-engineering NoL. We’ve started that editing process and then it too needs to be formatted for the system.

The 5G NoL is not yet complete, but is well underway.  Our 5G expert is also called upon to write legislation rebuttals to proposed legislation in various states in the US, which have deadlines, etc. and cannot be postponed, so she has to deal with those ‘distractions’.

We also have the completed smart meter NoL for Australia and New Zealand which only need to be formatted and then launched with groups there.

There is a lot to do, but it is moving very quickly…

This ‘movement’ is already past the point of no return (so to speak) with much movement.   Great things are about to manifest.

 

Peace,

Cal Washington

—————————

InPower is a global movement of men and women who are peacefully reclaiming our authority through the world’s first mass action of liability.

Many people have expressed concerns about super technologies, like 5G, and other often unwanted interventions which have been advertised as ‘progress toward a healthy and fantastic new living experience’, claims which do not stand up under scrutiny and are actually causing harm.

In response, we have developed a lawful, peaceful remedy that utilizes foundational laws and rules of commerce to turn the tables on the individuals who have been hiding behind corporations and governments as they inflict for-profit harm upon men, women, and children.

We invite you to learn more and join our community, launching in late summer 2019.

Take advantage of this introductory offer to join the InPower Community for a reduced rate of $10 per month.

You will be able to:

  • Create a secure profile where you can learn, create, and share
  • Access our exclusive learning management system
  • Receive guidance from leaders within our organization
  • Connect with like-minded people
  • Get up-to-speed on the most current tools available to reclaim your authority in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom (and we are actively expanding to more countries)

This limited-time offer is good through July 15, 2019.

To save your seat, go to http://www.inpowermovement.com/community

Detailed pricing:

We’re running a reduced membership promo through July 15th, which is $10 monthly for 3 months, or 6 months, or 1 year, or 2 years.

These prepaid membership promo prices save $15 for 3 months, $30 saved for 6 months, $60 saved for 1 year, or $120 saved for 2 year memberships.  After July 15, the normal monthly membership will be $15, offered at 3 or 6 month accounts, or 1 or 2 year accounts.

InPowermovememt.com/community

 

 

STOP 5G – DISCONNECTION DAY, 1st of July : European digital strike

https://oasisana.com/2019/06/27/stop-5g-disconnection-day-1st-of-july-european-digital-strike-lets-turn-off-our-smartphones-wi-fi-and-mobile-phones/

LINK

STOP 5G – DISCONNECTION DAY, 1st of July : European digital strike – let’s turn off our smartphones, Wi-Fi and mobile phones.

Written by Maurizio Martucci

We call them “telecommunication services accessible to public : users’ rights”. Among those electronic services, the European legislation called Universal Service Directive lists also the possibility to use data and to make phone calls without space and time limits within member States, regardless of the geographical position; Telcos have to guarantee to every European citizen/user universal, on-going and proper services. Without defining access procedures, we expressly talk about mobile phone as a European right. This is clear.

The problem is that mass high-speed communication force us to differently interpret Community law: the mobile phone concept is undermined by the dismantling of fixed telephony network, wireless technology is getting prevalent, to the detriment of “disabled consumers” (people suffering from electromagnetic hypersensitivity) who “could benefit from an offer suitable for their needs and equal to other users”.

Telecommunication right is upset by companies’ free will and convenience and 5G represents the tip of the iceberg: without considering the unheard complaints about health and ecosystem risks made by the international medical-scientific community, users will be forced to passively suffer the consequences and to effectively contribute to telephones and “smart devices” conversion – as they will be equipped with mini-antennas -, in the name of the Internet of things.

In France, starting from 2018, it’s no more possible to have a traditional landline service, 9.4 million contracts were terminated and the final goal is to fully substitute landlines with mobile phone by 2023. Italy is concerned by this forced decrease of traditional services, too: within 2024, 6,000 telephone exchanges (out of 10,500) will be dismantled. Traditional landline phones will completely disappear, cable-based communications will become old-fashioned and the Electromagnetic Age based on wireless technology will be the only choice. We all know the declared objective of 5G: simultaneously connect up to 1 million devices per square kilometer on 98% of our national territory, in order to cover 99% of citizens. The Italian Authority for Communications Guarantees (AGCOM) has recently proposed to convert (increasingly rare) old callboxes into Wi-Fi spots integrated with Smart City projects.

For those who still haven’t noticed it, we now find ourselves at an epoch-making crossroads. Non-reliable technologies and health protection from an invisible hazard are the two main cruxes to solve: we need to do it now and in a quick way, before it is too late!
In order to raise public awareness, on 27th June 2019, a press conference will be arranged at the Italian Chamber of Deputies and Alleanza Italiana Stop 5G (Italian alliance stop 5G) will present the new social campaign called DISCONNESSI DAY – DISCONNECTION DAY (live Web Tv streaming on the official Montecitorio channel).

On an international level, on 29th June 2019, a conference will be organized in Mendrisio (TicinoSwitzerland) and the European Alliance Stop 5G – including committees, associations and citizens from 16 EU countries – will proclaim the first European joint mobilization day, called STOP 5G – DISCONNESSI DAY. It will take place on 1st July and it will be the EUROPEAN DAY FOR DIGITAL STRIKE in order to make Constitutional article 32 triumph.

In the light of a memorable weekend of 2016, when the No Wi-Fi Days Committee managed to make people turn off 10,000 Wi-fi devices in conjunction with the 30th anniversary of Internet appearance in Italy. The national DISCONNESSI DAY event is sponsored by the Italian consumers and association (Centro Tutela Utenti Consumatori and Movimento Consumatori).

Translation of Giorgia Stocco

REDODUCTION ALLOWED, CITING AUTHOR AND SOURCE

Stop 5G Newsletter, June 2019

Stop 5G News June 2019 (click HERE)

Sixth issue of the Stop 5G Space Appeal Newsletter
ACTION: 1st of every month: Disconnected Day – no MW/MMW devices to be used!
ACTION: premier jour de chaque mois: jour déconnecté
AKTION: jeder erste des Monats stop mit Ihrem Handy und wifi router
PLEASE NOTE: International Tribunal for Natural Justice: Weaponisation of
the biosphere, 23-24 June 2019 (submit evidence – urgent)
 
A noter: Tribunal International pour la Justice naturelle: militarisation de la biosphère, 23-24 juin 2019
(veuillez soumettre les documents tout de suite)
 
BITTE BEACHTEN Sie: Internationale Tribunal für Natürlichen Gerechtigkeit: Weaponization der Biosphäre, 23-24 Juni 2019 (bitte Nachweis dringend)
Mostly in English, but items also in French, German. and some other languages. Note: this newsletter is A5 so if you print,
choose setting “Fit to page” or similar.
To translate articles or websites, drop text or URL into Yandex Translate at https://translate.yandex.com/translate.
Meistens in Englisch, aber auch in Französisch, Deutsch und einige andere Sprachen. Hinweis: dieser newsletter ist A5,
also wenn Sie es drucken, wählen Sie “Zur Seite passen” oder ähnliches. Um Artikel oder websites zu übersetzen, drop text oder URL in Yandex Translate at https://translate.yandex.com/translate
Pour la plupart en anglais, mais aussi en français, en allemand et quelques autres langues. Note: ce bulletin est A5; donc si vous l’imprimez,
choisissez “Ajuster à la page” ou similaire. Pour traduire des articles ou des sites Web,
déposez du texte ou une URL dans Yandex Translate à https://translate.yandex.com/translate
International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

 

5G and EMF Articles at HIN

5G Technology is Coming – Linked to Cancer, Heart Disease, Diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and Death

The new fifth generation (5G) cellular system that is being installed in every major American city. It will intensify the microwave radiation health risks for everyone living in those cities. It is estimated that the daily microwave exposure generated by the 5G system will be equivalent to living inside a…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2018/5g-technology-is-coming-linked-to-cancer-heart-disease-diabetes-alzheimers-and-death/

Can New 5G Technology and Smart Meters be Used as Weapons?

Promoted as beneficial technology for electric consumers and marketed to satisfy the public’s never-ending demand for faster internet communication, the combination of the new 5G microwave technology and smart meters might just become an all-in-one weapons and surveillance system. This technology, when fully implemented, could intrude into people’s privacy by…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2017/can-new-5g-technology-and-smart-meters-be-used-as-weapons/

Will Nanotechnologies and the New 5G Network Become the Most Powerful Weapon System the World Has Ever Seen?

When the nanotechnology in human bodies is activated by special frequencies from the 5-G network, we could experience the most powerful weapon system that has ever been invented. Unlike atomic weapons that kill everyone and create a toxic disaster for both the winners and the losers of war, the pairing…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/will-nanotechnologies-and-the-new-5g-network-become-the-most-powerful-weapon-system-the-world-has-ever-seen/

Telecom Giants and Federal Government Forcing Local Governments to Radiate Your Home with 5G Microwaves

State and local government shut out. Health risks ignored. Telecom companies are preparing to unleash the next wave of wireless technology in neighborhoods across the nation, deployed block by block. Traditional cell towers are bad enough—now telecom companies want to put a small cell tower right in your front yard,…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2018/telecom-giants-and-federal-government-forcing-local-governments-to-radiate-your-home-with-5g-microwaves/

New Smart Meters and 5G Technologies Can Be Used to Intercept All of Your Private Data

Will smart meters and 5G cellular services become a threat to the security of our computers and smart phones? Breaches in security from these new microwave technologies are quite possible. According to Bell Labs, the smart meter is actually the weakest element in the data security system used by utility…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2017/new-smart-meters-and-5g-technologies-can-be-used-to-intercept-all-of-your-private-data/

New 5G Cell Towers and Smart Meters to Increase Microwave Radiation – Invade Privacy

When the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) approved the use of 5-G microwave communication technology in 2016 and approved the use of microwave frequencies in the 30 Ghz range, they opened the door to even higher levels of human illness and severe disability for American children and adults. The introduction of…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2017/new-5g-cell-towers-and-smart-meters-to-increase-microwave-radiation-invade-privacy/

20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth

Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and in local urban communities where there would be a cell tower approximately every…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/20000-satellites-for-5g-to-be-launched-sending-focused-beams-of-intense-microwave-radiation-over-entire-earth/

Judge Orders British Man Opposing 5G Released from Jail – Attempts to Silence Him Failed

Mark Steele, from England, has been making headlines for telling the truth about the dangers of 5-G. He has been trying to educate the Gateshead community and its Council about the serious risks of 5-G technology. The Gateshead Council approved the installation of new LED street lights, which contain 5-G…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/judge-orders-british-man-opposing-5g-released-from-jail-attempts-to-silence-him-failed/

10 Year Study on Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation finds Link to Cancer – FDA does Nothing

The results of a 30 million dollar, ten-plus year study on the effects of cell phone radiofrequency radiation (RFR) were published this year, 2018, confirming suspicions that cell phone use is carcinogenic. However, the FDA refuses to admit there is any risk in cell phone usage.
http://healthimpactnews.com/2018/10-year-study-on-cell-phone-radiofrequency-radiation-finds-link-to-cancer-fda-does-nothing/

4th Child Develops Cancer after California Elementary School Cell Tower Installed

Four students and three teachers have reportedly been diagnosed with cancer at an elementary school in Ripon, California, after a cell tower was installed directly on the school grounds about 3 years ago. After the 4th child was diagnosed with cancer earlier this month (March, 2019), some parents reportedly pulled…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/4th-child-develops-cancer-after-california-elementary-school-cell-tower-installed/

Smart Meters: Countdown to a National Crisis of Illness and Death

Electric utility companies are in the process of installing smart meters at all of their customer locations, which are making thousands of their customers sick. These meters emit microwave radiation in the 900+ megahertz frequency band, which is known to cause weakness, fatigue, sleep disturbances, heart palpitations, ringing in the…
http://healthimpactnews.com/2017/smart-meters-countdown-to-a-national-crisis-of-illness-and-death/
Re: 5G Day of Action II – July 27th
To: Grassroots Communications <gee@grassrootsinfo.org>
Cc: info@americansforresponsibletech.org, Zoe Berg , Andy Gmail , maurizio.martucci@tin.it
what can I say when all addressed do not respond to sort like invitations as yours?
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Lex Mercatoria <lexmercatoria5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:51 AM
Subject: Fwd: European stop 5g alliance
To: <info@americansforresponsibletech.org>
Cc: Andy Gmail , Zoe Berg , <maurizio.martucci@tin.it>, Straal-zelf stop5G , Kathie Schene
Dear Madam, Sir,
As you can see below, in Europe there’s a drive towards joining resources.
Please digest the msg below and share your thoughts on your involvement.
Yours sincerely,
Emil Möller
Netherlands
+31651860992
———- Forwarded message ———
From: Lex Mercatoria <lexmercatoria5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:32 PM
Subject: European stop 5g alliance
To: <maurizio.martucci@tin.it>
Cc: Lisa H
Dear Maurizio,
Through Lisa Henkes [inpowermovement, cc] I learned from your quest for a European alliance on stopping 5g.
From the wikipedia page devoted to you, as well as from https://www.sololibri.net/Elettrosmog-Maurizio-Martucci-libro.html I understand you are concerned about the health hazards of EMF and seek to address this through political means.
Please allow me to make some comments:
1. EMF indeed is a major health hazard
2. 5g originates from the military domain. It’s potential and projected use is control of all of life: plant, animal and human. It can be seen as a significant and irreversible step towards the creation of a Simulacrum, benefiting a few to the detriment of all other life forms [who will live in ‘a desert of the real’, ad infinitum].
3. the real, or deeper, issue is that this Simulacrum [consisting of IoT, followed by an Internet of Humans towards an envisioned Transhumanist utopia] brings about an end to a free, full spectrum expression of life, including free will in humans.
4. there is a power structure in place, which is highly compartmentalized and works on a need to know basis. This structure sucks up wealth and pushes down control. It has a pyramid shape, with minerals, plants, animals and people at its base and a financial elite at its top. Located directly over the base is ‘government’ [which shows its cards, when looked at etymologically: ‘gubernare’ = to control , ‘mens’ = mind. Placed on top of government [directing it] are corporations, topped by banks, topped by central banks, topped by the Bank of International Settlements, topped by a financial elite. In real life, global spin doctors create and use Hegelian dialectics in sync with natural cycles, as well [criminal] syndicates to centralize power and control. Leading me to problematize your perspective, which I understand as seeking influence through political means. Frank Zappa probably phrases it best: ‘Politics is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex’.
5. on September 15th there will be a meeting in Amsterdam, named ‘5g The Trojan horse‘. The space will hold 500 people and it will be streamed live. See msg to Sacha Stone for details:
Dear Sacha,
Respect for how you practice service to Self.
Your New Earth project, as I understand from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37ZCFd6sI00, takes what I suggested a while ago to Refugeenation [here] to a next level.
The description below your documentary deserves to be seen by all
We know what this technology is – we know how it was conceived and we know where it is intended to take people and planet.
We are drawing the line here….and we are doing so with the full fire of consciousness. Arise Homo sapiens!
What I want to offer you [and thereby all of life], is an extra opportunity to share your vision and evoke resonance in all and sundry.
On September 15th there will be an event in https://www.melkweg.nl/en/. It will be dedicated to changing the course set by governments and corporations regarding the wireless communications upgrade; from weaponry to livingry.
The space holds 500 people and we expect to have it sold out, especially when our attempts to engage one or more Dutch celebrities, who see the dystopian potential of 5g, are successful [as we expect].
Given the ease of bringing the potential the event represents forward, we trust that we are midwifing an idea whose time has come.
So far we have had a vision which consisted mainly of avoiding disaster. With your New Earth project we feel invited to explore building society anew.
Barrie Trower, Patrick Wood, Raymond Broomhall, Cal Washington have agreed to join us through a live video feed that day.  We’re working on the mayor of Florence and the mayors of municipalities in Marin County.
Using the adagium ‘reculer pour mieux sauter’: the other speakers represent the reculer &  the beginning of sauter and you represent sauter proper:  homo sapiens now seriously longing for the sea, so it will feel a drive to find & create tools and use them to build a ship.
Would you be willing to join us that day?
Namaste,
Emil Möller
+31651860992

6. given the key role of ICNIRP [as in the wizard, from the Wizard of Oz; recent msg to them here], a mass gathering at their doorstep [Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1 85764 Oberschleissheim] that day, with a 2 way live video feed with the Amsterdam venue could create the ripple we need. There are interesting similarities between the picture of the horses in the Trojan horse convocation and   ICNIRP [= left horse]  and the natural preserve adjacent to them [right horse], which can add to the impact of the event in 2 venues.

7. given the leading role of the top of the pyramid, a simultaneous mass meeting at the BIS [Centralbahnpl. 2, 4002 Basel], would be expedient.
8. our power is in numbers; only large [as in 100.000’s] numbers will create a blip on the radar screen of the collective consciousness  / mass media. For this we’re reaching out to celebrities who could show courage and speak truth to power.
Cordiali saluti,
 
Emil Möller
+31651860992

 

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:23 AM Grassroots Communications <gee@grassrootsinfo.org> wrote:

 

Please join our next national
5G Day of Action on July 27th

Dear 5G Organizers,

Our next 5G National Day of Action will be held on Saturday, July 27th.

We have just six weeks to spread the word in our communities about the 5G issue, mobilize a large group of people to participate in rallies and generate media attention.

Just like our May 15th rallies, we encourage you to host events in front of stores like Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint. Photos of unhappy consumers in front of the retail outlets of major wireless carriers sends a powerful message.

The “theme” for this 5G National Day of Action is 5G: An Undeniable Risk. The “risk” encompasses a variety of issues associated with the 5G rollout, including, but not limited to, health concerns, property values and cybersecurity concerns.

In addition, our goal is to grow the 5G pushback movement as quickly and effectively as possible. While we will continue to keep the spotlight on health, we will be including these other concerns in our messaging for the rallies with the hope that our outreach will resonate with a larger demographic.

Learn more about the July 27th event. 

Next week, we will provide you with a suggested “Calendar of Suggested Deadlines” to help you organize your team and ensure that preparation for the day of action is completed in a timely manner.

Also, stay tuned for the launch of two ART training modules that will provide your team with key information about
• The importance of messaging
• Marketing your event to the public and press

We will also be producing a training module for new organizations, called “How to Start and Grow Your Organization.” We hope you will pass this information on to friends and fellow activists around the country.

We look forward to working with you again to raise awareness of this very important emerging 5G issue.

– The Americans for Responsible Technology Team

Copyright © 2019 Grassroots Comunications, All rights reserved.

Articles from Technocracy News

Human Rights Lawyer: Facial Recognition Is Arsenic In The Water Of Democracy

By Ian Sample on Jun 11, 2019 08:35 pm
One critic of Social Engineering and Digital Slavery, aka Technocracy, suggests that “Mass surveillance has a chilling effect that distorts public behaviour.” Indeed, the world has little time left to reverse the trend.
Read in browser »

In China’s Smart Cities, Everyone Is Being Watched

By Jamil Anderlini on Jun 11, 2019 08:16 pm
There is no escape from digital slavery: China now reveals that “most citizens are required to download apps on their phones that let the authorities monitor what they look at and track their movements.”
Read in browser »

6G Will Combine AI With Real-Time Speeds Of 1 Terabyte/Sec.

By MIT Technology Review on Jun 11, 2019 08:05 pm
If 5G is just a stepping stone to 6G, then hold on to your seat. AI plus instantaneous connections will enable ad-hoc networks of things and people to achieve unheard-of outcomes.
Read in browser »

Recent Articles:

Merkel Admits: German Multiculturalism Has ‘Utterly Failed’
Study: Solar And Wind Generation Makes Electricity More Expensive
Study: Ride Sharing Services Actually Increase Traffic Congestion
Interest In Orwell’s Classic ‘1984’ Still Endures After 70 Years
What’s Hidden In Your New ‘Smart City’ Street Lights?

Artificial Intelligence: it will kill us

 

For more information on Jay Tuck, please visit our website:

http://www.tedxhamburg.de

US defense expert Jay Tuck was news director of the daily news program ARD-Tagesthemen and combat correspondent for GermanTelevision in two Gulf Wars.  He has produced over 500 segments for the network. His investigative reports on security policy, espionage activities and weapons technology appear in leading newspapers, television networks and magazines throughout Europe, including Cicero, Focus, PC-Welt, Playboy, Stern, Welt am Sonntag and ZEITmagazin. He is author of a widely acclaimed book on electronic intelligence activities, “High-Tech Espionage” (St. Martin’s Press), published in fourteen countries. He is Executive Producer for a weekly technology magazine on international television in the Arab world. For his latest book “Evolution without us – Will AI kill us?” he researched at US drone bases, the Pentagon, intelligence agencies and AI research institutions. His lively talks are accompanied by exclusive video and photographs.

This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at http://ted.com/tedx

Frightening Stuff Hidden in Your Street Light?

Are your street lights watching you?

Such a benign and banal part of the urban landscape that city-dwellers may not even notice them, street lights are useful for brightening up a road and not much else – or so you might think. People these days are used to the idea of CCTV cameras, even hidden ones, but street lights tend to blend in to the background. Perhaps that is why they are finding new functions in the modern world, with its zealotry for surveillance. These seemingly innocuous devices can host anything from microphones and cameras to facial recognition and de facto compulsory 5G wifi transmission.

LED lampposts are being installed in cities and public places across the world, only partly because of their economical, energy-saving properties. With the new installations comes a wide range of sensors designed to capture data on public activity. As Chuck Campagna, CEO of lighting company Amerlux, told The New York Times, “We are opening up an entirely new area in lighting applications and services, including video-based security and public safety, parking management, predictive maintenance and more.”

“We see outdoor lighting as the perfect infrastructure to build a brand new network,” added Hugh Martin, chief executive of the company Sensity, which installed smart lighting at Newark airport. “We felt what you’d want to use this network for is to gather information about people and the planet.”

Lighting in a Smart City

In April 2018, Singapore announced that it would run a “Lamppost-as-a-Platform” pilot program, in which a variety of sensors, including cameras linked to facial-recognition technology, would be attached to street lighting. GovTech, the department in charge of the project, told Reuters that the technology would be used to perform “crowd analytics” and help in terrorism investigations. According to the city-state’s former top civil servant Peter Ong, the goal is to link every lamppost to a network of sensors. In October, it was announced that Singapore Technologies Engineering (STENGG) had won the bid to provide the technology, and a similar smart lamppost program would commence in Hong Kong, where 50 of the lights are set to be installed by June. The Hong Kong lamppost design certainly contains surveillance cameras, but it is unclear whether they also will be linked to facial-recognition programs.

STENGG’s smart lampposts are designed merely to be a thread in a wider Internet of Things web, in which virtually every object is connected to a shared network. As part of such a system, lampposts are so much more than just street illuminators; they are multi-purpose devices used to monitor the cityscape. The design incorporates environmental sensors, a wifi hotspot, an infotainment display, radar for vehicle monitoring, and, of course, equipment for “public safety and traffic surveillance.” Naturally, this aspect of the network is downplayed; a promotional video for the company’s WISX Internet of Things system doesn’t mention population surveillance at all, and neither does a Hong Kong government brochure.

Singapore is a successful country but one well known for highly controlled social discipline. Would Western countries allow such potentially invasive technology to be planted on every street?

In STENGG’s 2018 sustainability performance review, CEO Vincent Chong says the company has been hired to enable smart street lighting in cities in Canada, the United States, Britain, New Zealand, and Israel, as well for as other infrastructure projects across the globe.

Urban Surveillance

It isn’t necessary to create an entire smart grid in order to install surveillance technology into street lights. As early as 2007, the idea of securing cameras to street lights was being discussed in the United Kingdom; in 2010, a system of microphones was deployed on street lights in several British cities. The high-powered microphones were designed to pick up on angry or distressed voices and suspicious sounds, automatically triggering a linked camera to zoom in on the source of the noise.

Similar technology has been used in several U.S. cities, most notably New York, which fixed microphones to street lamps in high-crime neighborhoods. The ShotSpotter sensors are said to pick up only loud, suspicious noises, such as gunshots or shouting, and then send an alert to the police department. Although the data appear to have been less than dependable, it has not stopped police from attempting to use it as evidence in criminal trials.

“There’s a few things that are problematic,” said Monroe County Assistant Public Defender Katie Higgins, working on behalf of Silvon Simmons, a man on trial for allegedly shooting at a police officer in 2016, based on ShotSpotter recordings. “One is that it was designed to be an investigative tool for the police, to alert them to possible gunfire and allow them to respond to see if there are civilian witnesses or other evidence of gunfire. But it was not designed to be used as actual primary evidence (in a trial).” The judge in the case apparently agreed, having ruled the recordings too “unreliable” for use as the key piece of evidence to convict a man.

In 2017, San Diego became perhaps the U.S. city most invested in surveillance street lighting, teaming up with General Electric to install cameras, microphones, and sensors in more than 3,000 lampposts. Other locales, as well as federal agencies, have ordered recording equipment for installation in street lamps. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) have purchased such devices, Quartz reports, based on government procurement documents.

Christie Crawford, owner of Cowboy Streetlight Concealments, from which the DEA purchases equipment, said:

“We do street light concealments and camera enclosures.  Basically, there’s businesses out there that will build concealments for the government and that’s what we do. They specify what’s best for them, and we make it. And that’s about all I can probably say .… I can tell you this—things are always being watched. It doesn’t matter if you’re driving down the street or visiting a friend, if government or law enforcement has a reason to set up surveillance, there’s great technology out there to do it.”

Urban Solution or Tool of Tyranny?

Finally, 5G wireless internet is well and truly being rolled out in 2019. While previous wifi connections, such as 4G, have been optional in one’s home – a resident could either choose to purchase wifi or not – street lights are one of the vehicles to carry 5G transmitters. Due to the high-frequency, short-range nature of 5G’s millimeter waves, it’s necessary to situate transmitters at regular intervals in order to keep a signal going. You will no longer have any choice over whether you want a constant wifi signal in your residence; it will be effectively mandatory for all urban dwellers because the electromagnetic signals will be blasted into homes from the street. Given the untested nature of 5G technology, some people may want a little more control over their exposure than that.

Are smart lampposts the next great solution for urban planning and city management, or a convenient mechanism for public surveillance? It seems almost ridiculous to suggest that street lamps could be the next most useful tool of tyranny, but their very banality and regular placement on streets makes them the perfect vehicle to monitor – and, therefore, control – wide swathes of the world’s population.

 

Violence in Schools: Exploring Causation & Solutions

 

“The greatest crisis that America faces today, as big as any of our environmental crises is the chronic disease epidemic in America’s children. The generation of American children born after 1990 is arguably the sickest generation in the history of our country. With chronic ailments and pediatric rates of some chronic conditions that are the highest in the world.”
-Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

DISCLAIMER: Every effort is made to ensure accurate information is shared within these video messages. However, if you believe that anything is incorrect, I would appreciate your respectfully letting me know, via email, along with supporting reference link(s). If appropriate, I will issue a retraction or correction – thank you.

Christine’s email:  studio_luna@comcast.net

REFERENCE LINKS:

Mentioned in Video Message:

WND: Law would let schools diagnose kids ‘mentally ill’

“Virtual Autism” May Explain Explosive Rise in ASD Diagnoses by Marilyn Wedge, PhD

LINK to WIRED SCHOOLS Grouphttps://www.facebook.com/groups/WiredSchools/ – JOIN US TODAY!

LINKS TO STUDIES:

There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of RF radiation. Here we present some of the most recent.

Screen Time in Schools – Camilla Rees – on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation

The WHO Coverup that is Costing us the Earth

Dr. Magda Havas: Wi-Fi in Schools is Safe. True or False?

Millennials Besieged by Chronic Illness: From Age 27, It’s All “Downhill”

Arthur Firstenberg – 5G, Birds, Bees, and Humanity

Mass shootings likely linked to psychiatric meds

Does Your Child Have Symptoms of Wi-Fi Exposure at School?

“It’s Time to EMF off!”

What is electro-sensitivity and why are so many people getting sick? In this powerful four-minute video, Lewis Evans explains how the microwave radiation in our environment (from Wi-Fi, cell towers, mobile phones and other wireless devices) is affecting our health, brains, environment, food supply and viability as a species. Four minutes that could save your life.

A Message to Schools about Wireless

“Turn if Off 4 Kids” Initiative Toolkit

10 Elements of an Electromagnetically Clean and Conscious School

 

 

 

 

 

Alarming Decline in Millennials’ Health

Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 6:48 PM
Subject: 5G Space Appeal: News and Needs
THIS APPEAL BECOMES MORE URGENT

Satellites Launched  •  Lawsuit Filed  •  Donations Needed

_______________

News

Alarming Decline in Millennials’ Health

Millennials — the first generation to grow up using cell phones — are experiencing an unprecedented decline in their health when they reach their late 20s.

On April 24, 2019, the American health insurance association Blue Cross Blue Shield released a report titled “The Health of Millennials.” It showed not only that the health of this generation takes a sharp decline beginning at age 27, but also that the prevalence of many medical conditions rose precipitously among millennials in just three years.

The prevalence of eight of the top ten conditions among all millennials showed a double-digit increase in 2017 as compared with 2014. Major depression increased 31%. Hyperactivity increase 29%. Type II diabetes increased 22%. Hypertension increased 16%. Psychoses increased 15%. High cholesterol increased 12%. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis increased 10%. Substance use disorder increased 10%.

The decline in millennials’ health from 2014 to 2017 was not due to their being three years older. The report also compared the health of millennials who were 34-36 years old in 2017 to the health of Gen Xers who were 34-36 years old in 2014. At the same age, 34- to 36-year-olds in 2017 had 37% more hyperactivity, 19% more diabetes, 18% more major depression, 15% more Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, 12% more substance use disorder, 10% more hypertension, and 7% more high cholesterol than 34- to 36-year-olds had in 2014.

When the researchers looked at all health conditions, they found that 34- to 36-year-olds in 2017 had a 21% increase in cardiovascular conditions, a 15% increase in endocrine conditions, and an 8% increase in other physical conditions compared to 34- to 36-year-olds in 2014.

The Blue Cross Blue Shield report is here: https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-america/reports/the-health-of-millennials.

The only reasonable explanation for the alarming decline in health of the millennial generation is the life-long irradiation of their brains and bodies from their cell phones.

First Launches of 5G Satellites

On the evening of May 23, 2019, Elon Musk’s company SpaceX launched its first 60 “Starlink” satellites into low orbit around the Earth. The satellites were launched from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida on a Falcon 9 rocket. Musk announced his intention to carry out six more launches this year, each carrying 60 satellites, and that when the first 420 satellites are in orbit, they will be turned on and will begin providing global 5G service to SpaceX’s first customers. This could happen by the end of 2019.

SpaceX intends for its rockets to carry 120 satellites at a time into orbit beginning in 2020, and to complete its planned fleet of 12,000 satellites within a decade. SpaceX’s license from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission permits each satellite to emit an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts.

SpaceX’s competitor, OneWeb, is not far behind. OneWeb launched the first 6 of its planned fleet of 4,540 satellites on February 27, 2019. It announced its intention to launch 36 satellites per month and to turn them on as soon as 648 satellites are in orbit. This could happen by the end of 2020.

On April 4, 2019, Amazon announced that it is planning to launch its own fleet of more than 3,000 5G satellites.

5G in Space is a planetary emergency, as outlined in the article of that title that I wrote a year ago: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/planetary-emergency. It is an emergency not just because of the direct radiation from the satellites, but because of the location of the satellites in the ionosphere. The ionosphere is an integral part of the global electrical circuit that animates all living things. Even a few hundred satellites using the enormous amount of bandwidth that is available in the millimeter wave spectrum is expected to pollute the global electrical circuit — and therefore our bodies — with what building biologists call dirty electricity. This is likely to be catastrophic to all life on Earth.

I am presently involved in an effort to open up lines of communication with the principals of the satellite projects, including Elon Musk. They care about the future of this planet too, and they mistakenly think they are doing good.

Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G

The Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety filed a lawsuit to stop 5G in U.S. District Court in New Mexico on December 21, 2018. We are asking the court to declare that city, state, and federal laws which deprive citizens of the right to protect themselves from harm, and deprive injured persons of any remedy for their injuries, are unconstitutional and void.

These laws violate the First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government for redress of grievances. These laws violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments because they deprive people of life, liberty and property without due process of law, and because they are a taking of property without just compensation. Our First Amended Complaint can be seen here: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Doc-19-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf.

Appeal Statistics, Appeal Needs

Signatures as of June 6, 2019

These are the approximate numbers of people to date who have signed the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space:

2,000 scientists
1,400 medical doctors
4,000 engineers
2,200 nurses
2,500 psychologists
1,200 organizations
100,000 total individuals and organizations from 187 countries.

Please Circulate the Appeal

It is time to push this Appeal hard. Please send the Appeal (www.5gSpaceAppeal.org), and also forward this email, to everyone you know. Every person on Earth has a stake in our future. We need as many signatures from as many different kinds of people as possible.

While we were working on the website, some people had problems accessing the signature form. That is now fixed, and everybody should be able to sign. Please do not sign more than once. If you sign for the first time now, your name will appear on the website within a few days. If you signed between December and April, your name will be appear on the list within a few weeks. Signatures are now processed automatically, but I still have to review all the submissions before making them live. I am working as fast as I can to keep up.

Donations Are Needed

Donations are needed to support every aspect of this work — the federal lawsuit, the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, a media campaign, lobbyists to present the Appeal to governments, etc. I need a secretary and a bookkeeper. Donations can be made on the Appeal website and are tax-deductible for U.S. citizens: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/donate.  For large donations or stock transfers, please contact me. A big thank you to those who have already contributed.

This work is also supported by sales of my book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (AGB Press 2017). It gives the background history and science that is necessary in order to understand what is happening today. It is the first book ever published that tells the history of electricity from an environmental point of view. It is available for sale here: http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/buy-the-invisible-rainbow. All proceeds go into the effort to stop 5G.

Also a big thank you to Antoinette Janssen and Multerland, who turned my talk in Taos, New Mexico of August 12, 2018 into a superb YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/embed/MpdJ_t5XMvw?feature=oembed

Arthur Firstenberg, Administrator
International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
USA
Tel: +1 505-471-0129
Email: info@cellphonetaskforce.org
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org

Harvard Scientist Warns: There’s No Way 5G Is Harmless

The New Dark Age

5 June 2019 — Dr Mercola

Can you believe the FCC and the wireless industry trade association when they claim there’s no risk with 5G wireless, especially since they haven’t funded any safety studies? Why Brussels and Belgium halted their testing and Switzerland is delaying its 5G rollout amid 2,000 studies showing harm.

 Story at-a-glance

  • 5G relies primarily on the bandwidth of the millimeter wave, known to cause a painful burning sensation. It’s also been linked to eye and heart problems, suppressed immune function, genetic damage and fertility problems
  • FCC admits no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or telecom industry, and that none are planned
  • The FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which in turn has perfected the disinformation strategies employed by the tobacco industry before it
  • Persistent exposures to microwave frequencies like those from cellphones can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and nuclear…

View original post 34 more words

A Primer for Corrupt Governments: How to Implement 5G Wireless Technology Against the Wishes of Your Population

By Claire Edwards
Global Research, June 03, 2019

Spare a thought for all the governments wanting to cash in on the multi-trillion-dollar bonanza of the fifth generation of wireless technology or 5G while pacifying the half of their population who are anxious about its dire health and environmental consequences and keeping in ignorance the other half of the population who do not yet oppose its introduction because they are uninformed about its dangers.

Various governments have adopted different strategies to tackle this challenge, any of which may serve as a template for other governments to use. Let us take some instructive examples from Austria, France, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Governments that have been dilatory in availing themselves of the surveillance and control potential of 5G to quash dissent may wish to choose a strategy from the following list that they feel is most compatible with the national character and situation of their country and therefore most likely to meet their need for a smooth and rapid 5G rollout.

Austria: brute force and public ignorance

The most advisable strategy for any cautious government is to ensure that the population remains uninformed of the dangers of 5G. This is relatively simple to achieve by using brute force to rapidly sign into law legislation forcing the entire population to accept “smart” meters with no possibility of refusal, as the Austrian government did in 2018, and issuing a Gesteznovelle or amendment to a law allowing 5G antennas to be installed on all public buildings, including nurseries, kindergartens and schools. This results in a quick 5G rollout, which can then be portrayed as a triumph in the race to digitalization and its claimed benefits of more jobs, faster downloads, low latency, fourth industrial revolution, core cloud, cutting edge technology, or any other similarly hyperbolic promotional rhetoric designed to con the public (or, in PR language, “capture the public imagination”).

Complicity with the media conveniently ensures that no whisper of the dangers inherent in a new and untested technology penetrates the public sphere. The population remains in ignorance, is not given the option to refuse 5G infrastructure and is propagandized to believe that their country is at the forefront of the modern age. This strategy has much to recommend it and avoids all controversy, long-winded debate, troublesome negotiations, annoying delays and unnecessary costs.  Well done, Austria, for demonstrating how easy the 5G rollout can be when such a simple and highly effective strategy is adopted!

France: trickery and opportunism

France offers two possible strategies for rolling out 5G, each of which has great potential. France’s majority state-owned ENEDIS is steamrolling the French public with “smart” meters (called “Linky”) for the 5G Internet of Things, despite opposition from 71% of the population. Since 1884, electric meters belong to the municipalities of France, 906 of which, out of a total of 35,498 (2.5%) are refusing “smart” meters, a number that is constantly rising. The French population recognizes that “smart” meters are being imposed without their consent, with many complaints of trickery used by ENEDIS subcontractors, including some where the gendarmerie had to intervene to protect the citizenry.

If stealth and trickery should fail, another possibility is to take advantage of a national tragedy to impose 5G surreptitiously. While the nation is preoccupied mourning the loss of a much-loved historical monument, oligarchs – including those with close ties to telecommunications companies – have a whip round involving hundreds of millions of euros each to reconstruct rather than restore, your lawmakers announce the suspension of regulations regarding the protection of a national and world heritage site, and declare the legitimacy of rebuilding according to “the techniques and challenges of our era”. Any dissent expressed by historical experts or architects about the origins of the fire or the manner of rebuilding the monument is suppressed.

The public discovers only later that the ground on which the monument stood had already been subject to advance privatization plans before the terrible tragedyof its destruction and hey presto!, it can be rebuilt complete with modern technology suitable for the 5G rollout, especially appropriate and convenient given its central location as the “point zero” of France, from which all distances in the country are calculated.

Since France´s 5G rollout strategy is not yet complete, the above scenario remains at the level of speculation; only time will tell if indeed this strategy turns out to be the one employed. Whatever the case, it would have been a strong contender for most inventive strategy had it not been a longstanding and now rather tired strategy of disaster capitalism, these days greatly facilitated by the advent of directed energy weapons.

Switzerland: intricacies of the exclusion clause and amended subparagraph

Switzerland´s public servants are to be commended for demonstrating a mental dexterity that has enabled them to solve the conundrum of introducing 5G while facing an educated and informed citizenry. It has provided a useful template for the benefit of similarly unfortunate governments. Switzerland´s approach involves the devious use of exclusion clauses and innocent-looking subparagraphs.

Switzerland follows the exposure levels set out in the so-called safety guidelines of the so-called International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (more about these “guidelines” and ICNIRP later).  The problem for the Swiss government is that Switzerland has precautionary exposure levels for single transmitters (base stations) that are 10 times lower than the ICNIRP levels.

Having gone ahead and auctioned the available spectrum in the 700 MHz and 3.5 GHz bands in February 2019, netting US$380 million, the Swiss government was faced with the challenge of enabling the use of the spectrum it had sold by raising limits without alerting the public.

As the public and cantonal lawmakers gradually started to grasp the scale of the threat from the completely untested 5G, the federal government’s dilemma grew. First came a people´s petition to force a parliamentary debate on 5G signed by 56,000 Swiss, then the cantons of Vaud, Jura and Geneva adopted moratoria on the 5G rollout. These were closely followed by Neuchâtel, which posed a series of questions to the federal government regarding the safety of 5G technology.

Cantonal lawmakers and Swiss citizens were outraged when the majority state-owned Swisscom defied the opposition to 5G by using existing antennas installed for previous generations of wireless technology to impose 5G on 102 locations in Switzerland. They will doubtless be further outraged when they learn that Swisscom has known about the non-thermal effects of electromagnetic radiation since at least 2004, when it filed a patent on a method and system for reducing electro smog in wireless local networks. This reveals that Swisscom has rolled out 5G on the Swiss population in full knowledge of its ability to cause damage to DNA and increase cancer risk.

On 17 April, the federal government made its move to stymie the public opposition while enabling the 5G rollout. This constitutes a veritable primer on conning the public. It published a document modifying its 1999/2016 ordinance on protection against non-ionizing radiation (NIR), with effect from 1 June 2019. The beauty of this is that an ordinance cannot be challenged by a people´s referendum. The accompanying report helpfully explains the purpose and operation of the modifications.

Given that more than half the Swiss population considers the radiation emitted by mobile phone antennas to be dangerous or rather dangerous (Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS), Omnibus 2011, 2015), the modifications to the ordinance have two significant purposes: (1) to establish a system of monitoring public exposure to NIR (sect. 4.1.1) in accordance with the Aarhus Convention, which obliges ratifying states to inform the public about pollutants and their effects on people and the environment, and (2) to fill the gaps in regulation that impede the deployment of 5G (sect. 2).

Point 1, the monitoring system, sounds promising until we are told later on in the report that the Federal Office for the Environment (OFEV) would be tasked with informing the public periodically of the extent of their exposure to NIR and the state of the science on the effects of NIR, but that no coordination with the Federal Office of Public Safety would be required since “no biological marker or modification of a biological marker presenting a link with NIR or its effects on health has been identified to date [sic]” (sect. 4.1.1).

The great advantage of this strategy, we are told, is that the public would thereby be informed “in an objective manner about its exposure to NIR and its origin, and the current margin as compared to the limits set out in the ordinance, which would contribute to taking the passion out of the debate and the perception of risk”. And most satisfyingly, OFEV would always be in a position to justify to the public why the current exposure limits were in line with science and testing (sect. 4.1.2).  In other words, it would be a closed circle and no examination of the real health and environmental dangers of NIR would be possible.

Point 2 is equally a master-stroke, for filling in the gaps in regulations that impede the deployment of 5G turns out to mean that the modified ordinance should include a principle of evaluation of “beam-forming” antennas and that “mobile phone antennas that emit during less than 800 hours per annum” should be exempted from the requirement to “respect the preventative exposure limits” (sect. 2).

This sleight of hand enables the federal government to exclude all 5G antennas from regulation, since they are all beam-forming and, if their emissions are calculated on the basis of their “directionality”, as implied by the chap. 62, additional subpara. 6, which states that “[The term] beam-forming antennas is intended to mean the radiating direction or the antenna pattern is adjusted automatically at short intervals”, it appears that it could be not the entirety of the emissions that would be subject to calculation, but solely each direction of emission. 800 hours would permit two months of emissions per annum per stationary antenna, but if each degree of emission of, for example, 180 degrees of movement of a directional antenna were to be permitted 800 hours, then no 5G antenna, all of which are directional, could exceed 800 hours of emissions and therefore none would come within the ambit of the modified ordinance.

Et voilà!  As if by magic, the Swiss federal government checkmates the Swiss people and their cantonal governments to enable 5G!

It is to be noted here that, thanks to the diligence of Swiss NGO Gigaherz, Swiss telephone companies have already been caught in the act of illegally irradiating the Swiss people, when antennas hidden under manhole covers were found in 2018 to be transmitting way in excess of their permitted limits.

Who would know if the millions of beam-forming antennas throughout Switzerland were exceeding the permitted exposure limits or transmitting in excess of 800 hours? Would anyone want to risk exposure by taking up position within their vicinity, given that the new beam-forming antennas are “especially used with the high frequencies auctioned in early 2019” (sect. 4.3)?

No wonder Switzerland is famous for its high-class and high-tech products! Its skill and meticulousness in drafting such a Byzantine 5G rollout strategy trumps all!

United Kingdom: strict legalism and authoritative assertions

The United Kingdom can always be relied upon for its professed adherence to the rule of law. Thus enquirers as to the safety of 5G, both members of the public and parliamentarians, are treated to lengthy disquisitions on the reliability of the so-called science produced by the various official bodies responsible for assuring the public that they are duly protected from electromagnetic radiation (EMR). As in the popular British children´s party-game, this may be termed a “pass-the-parcel” strategy and is greatly facilitated by the existence of a large number of organizations with acronyms that may be conveniently juggled as needed.

Answers to questions in parliament or from the public are drafted along the following lines: Public Health England relies on AGNIR [if this body has unfortunately been disbanded due to allegations of conflict of interest, incompetence, lack of qualified experts, falsified science or any other reason, the name of another body such as ICNIRP or SCENIHR may be substituted here] to supply the scientific evidence showing the safety of wireless telecommunications technologies since [add appropriate date]. The World Health Organization endorses the safety guidelines set forth by [name of body] in setting its EMR safety guidelines. Should Public Health England be made aware of any changes in the science, it will amend its policies accordingly. 

It may easily be seen that the UK strategy is an astute one since it serves simultaneously to impress and mystify, for no one has any clue as to the meaning of the various acronyms or the tainted reputations of the various bodies named, especially when they hail from another country. Such is the case, for example, with the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection or ICNIRP, which is in reality just a little club of male scientists in Germany that appoints its own members without supervision or consultation with anyone and mysteriously receives funding from, and is housed by, the German government, conveniently in the same building with the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection. Nor would any UK citizen be likely to wonder how it came to be that the little club´s guidelines were adopted and endorsed not only by the UN´s World Health Organization, but also by its International Telecommunication Union.

Great work, United Kingdom! Deceiving the public while sounding sincere and trustworthy is quite an achievement. A note of caution, though, for other governments considering employing a similar strategy: it does necessitate a certain level of gullibility among the general public and is therefore unlikely to be effective in the case of populations already skeptical about government pronouncements.

United States: big spending by lobbyists to enable capture of government agencies

As may be expected of the United States, the preferred 5G rollout strategy involves money and muscle. The imposition of 5G without public consent or consultation was made possible long in advance by regulatory capture by industry, which ensured that laws were changed to prohibit injury to health and environmental damage being taken into account to prevent or hinder the rollout of 5G.

President Clinton signed into law the 1996 Telecommunications Act, section 704 of which states that no health or environmental concern can interfere with the placement of telecom equipment such as cell towers and antennas. Wireless facilities have been made a permitted use in all public rights-of-way, with the intention of locating them directly in front of homes and businesses and close above the heads of pedestrians, including mothers with babies. Public notice requirements and public hearings have been eliminated. Local authorities are prohibited from taking into consideration testimony from scientific experts. For example, local governments are prohibited from regulating wireless technology “on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation”, and courts have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health.

Combined with corporate control of the media, preferably by telecommunications companies, and manipulation of lawmakers by armies of highly paid lobbyists, the strategy of regulatory capture is much to be admired, since – barring the appearance of a lawmaker with integrity and the existence of alternative media – it becomes almost impossible for the public to learn that 5G was never tested for health or safety and poses an existential threat to the entire planet.

In a country such as the US that believes itself a bastion of freedom, the public are unlikely to find plausible the idea that they are being hoodwinked in this way over such a dangerous technology and the 5G rollout may therefore be expected to proceed relatively unhindered. Should any information on the adverse effects of 5G leak out, recourse may be made to the oft-used and handy “blame-it-on-the-Russians” narrative. It should be noted, however, that this strategy requires considerable advance planning and the easy availability of funds sufficient to make your point of view the only one visible to lawmakers. It will therefore not be within the means of all countries. Nevertheless, this one has to qualify for the prize in the “heavy-handed but effective” category.

International aid and assistance 

Implementation of the above strategies is likely to be facilitated by recourse to the assistance of international organizations. If the aim is to impose a global telecommunications technology capable of “blanketing” the Earth, as stated in the literature on 5G, especially one involving transmissions by satellites, it would be indispensable to enlist the aid of the United Nations. An appropriate Secretary-General would have to be appointed, preferably someone benefitting from a professional background as an electrical engineer and physicist. Timing here is all, for such an opportunity arises only once every eight years.

Should 5G proponents be successful in this, they would have struck gold, for a UN Secretary-General can guide all of the organization´s activities in the desired direction, ensuring that 5G deployment feeds into the implementation of all treaties and conventions and thus becomes seen as a sine qua non in all resulting policy-making activities.

The UN Secretary-General also has the prerogative of “spontaneously” appointing, for example, an international Panel on Digital Cooperation, which could include all the international proponents of 5G in one go, while conveniently excluding any difficult people such as scientists or physicians knowledgeable about the deleterious biological effects of EMR. The Panel´s terms of reference would want to ensure its separation from the usual work of the UN, again obviating time-wasting questions that might be posed by UN officials or other concerned experts. The members of the Panel would automatically gain access to all UN member states, thereby profiting from the opportunity of one-sidedly convincing them of the benefits of 5G while conveniently failing to mention any possible downsides to the technology.

Should anyone have the temerity to raise objections to the UN’s failure to even mention the word “health” in the context of its rush to embrace 5G in all its programs and to assist in its imposition on every inch of the planet as well as in space, the cooperation agreement between Interpol and the UN’s  International Telecommunication Union may be usefully invoked to intimidate such a person as a potential cybercriminal.

The generally favorable worldwide public view of UN activities combined with universal ignorance about those activities and their purposes makes seeking such international assistance distinctly advantageous.

A smorgasbord of opportunities for rolling out 5G

I hope it is clear by now to all the governments reading this primer on the world´s most effective 5G rollout strategies that they have a smorgasbord of opportunities and support available to them for implementing 5G. Excuses regarding opposition from namby-pamby scientists and physicians across the world complaining about the lack of health and safety testing of 5G, citing the tens of thousands of studies that demonstrate the biological effects of EMR, or calling 5G the stupidest idea in the history of the world will not be tolerated.

Nor will excuses regarding pockets of opposition from nationals of your countries who cite phenomenal rises in all the major diseases of civilization since the advent of wireless technology and smartphones, plus ADHD, autism, suicides, depression, neurological diseases, and catastrophic decreases in fertility across the planet, as well as major declines in insect populations.

5G IS A GOOD THING BECAUSE WE SAY SO AND YOU WILL DO AS YOU HAVE BEEN INSTRUCTED OR LIVE TO REGRET IT WHEN WE CONTROL EVERYTHING

Signed:

Sophia

pp. A.I.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Since May 2018, she has collaborated with Arthur Firstenberg to publish the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (www.5gspaceappeal.org), which is available in 28 languages. The Appeal has attracted over 94,000 individual and group signatories from more than 170 countries. Claire warned the Secretary-General about the dangers of 5G during a meeting with UN staff in May 2018, calling for a halt to its rollout at UN duty stations.

A Film About the Impending 5G Apocalypse

A Film About the Impending 5G Apocalypse

Written by Dr. Joseph Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • Persistent exposures to microwave frequencies like those from cellphones can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and nuclear DNA damage from free radicals produced from peroxynitrite
  • Excessive exposures to cellphones and Wi-Fi networks have been linked to chronic diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility
  • EMF exposure has increased about 1 quintillion times over the past 100 years. Most people experience biological impacts but have no appreciation of the damage it’s causing until it’s too late. Even then, it’s extremely difficult to link the exposure to the symptoms or the disease
  • 5G relies primarily on the bandwidth of the millimeter wave, known to cause a painful burning sensation. It’s also been linked to eye and heart problems, suppressed immune function, genetic damage and fertility problems
  • EMFs have clear neuropsychiatric effects, triggering everything from foggy thinking and headaches to learning disabilities and dementia

Are you still under the misconception that unchecked exposure to electromagnetic field (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation is of no concern? Then I urge you to view the featured documentary, “5G Apocalypse — The Extinction Event” by Sacha Stone.

Please understand that while I am not in agreement with some of Stone’s conspiracy theories on the militarization of these frequencies, the science is beyond solid to justify concern about 5G without throwing in conspiracy allegations. I do believe that, overall, the documentary was well done and nicely packages the nonconspiracy information.

EMF Exposure Has Dramatically Increased Over the Past 100 Years

Indeed, even the earlier, and less intense, generations of wireless technologies have been shown to produce severe harm over time. As explained in my 2017 interview with Martin Pall, Ph.D., professor emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University, the primary danger of EMFs — and what drives the processes of chronic disease — is mitochondrial damage triggered by peroxynitrites, one of the most damaging types of reactive nitrogen species.

Devices that continuously emit EMF radiation at levels that damage your mitochondria include your cellphone, cellphone towers, Wi-Fi routers and modems, baby monitors and “smart” devices of all kinds, including smart meters and smart appliances.

If you go back in time to the end of World War I, around 1918 or so, and use that timeframe as a baseline of EMF exposure among the general public, you come to the astonishing conclusion that EMF exposure has increased about 1 quintillion times over the past 100 years.

It’s irrational to assume that this radical increase — an increase of 1 billion times — could not have adverse effects on the environment and human health. The reality is that most people are experiencing biological impacts as a result of this exposure, but have no appreciation of the damage it’s causing until it’s too late. Even then, it’s extremely difficult to link EMF exposure to the symptoms or the disease.

Understanding the Mechanisms of Harm

According to Pall’s research,1,2,3,4 low-frequency microwave radiation such as that from your cellphone and wireless router activates the voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) located in the outer membrane of your cells. According to Pall, VGCCs are 7.2 million times more sensitive to microwave radiation than the charged particles inside and outside our cells, which means the safety standards for this exposure are off by a factor of 7.2 million.

Low-frequency microwave radiation opens your VGCCs, thereby allowing an abnormal influx of calcium ions into the cell, which in turn activates nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide which react nearly instantaneously to form peroxynitrite.5

Peroxynitrite than catalyzes massive oxidative stress by the creation of free radicals that are associated with an increased level of systemic inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction, and are thought to be a root cause for many of today’s chronic diseases.

For an in-depth understanding of peroxynitrites and the harm they inflict, see “Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease”6 — a 140-page paper with 1,500 references written by Dr. Pal Pacher, Joseph Beckman and Dr. Lucas Liaudet. It’s an epic paper and one of the best reviews I’ve ever read, and can be downloaded for free.

One of its most significant hazards of peroxynitrite is that it damages DNA. The European REFLEX study published in 2004 revealed the nonthermal effects of 2G and 3G radiation are actually very similar to the effects of X-rays in terms of the genetic damage they cause.7

Your body has the capacity to repair that damage through a family of 17 different enzymes collectively called poly ADP ribose polymerases (PARP). However, while PARP work well, they require NAD+ for fuel and when they run out of NAD+ they stop repairing your DNA, which can lead to premature cell death as over 100 to 150 NAD+ molecules are needed to repair every DNA strand break.

NAD+ is central to maintaining cellular and mitochondrial health, so the fact that PARP consumes NAD+ to counteract EMF damage is an important concern. Can you improve your NAD+ levels? Yes, but it’s a complex topic that really requires a book to carefully explain. As a first step, though, you need to reduce NAD+ consumption, which necessitates limiting your EMF exposure.


Damage Occurs Over Extended Periods of Time

Were the negative effects of EMFs immediately recognizable, matters would be much simpler. Alas, it doesn’t work that way. The damage accrues over time, similar to that from smoking. For years, you can get away without feeling any ill effects until, all of a sudden, you’re beset with debilitating symptoms.

Researchers are in general agreement that there’s a latency period of about 10 years or more before the damage shows up, which places children at greatest risk, since their exposures begin much earlier (nowadays in utero) and persist throughout life unless steps are taken to minimize their daily exposure.

While the controversy over EMF damage has centered around whether or not it can cause cancer, especially brain tumors, this actually isn’t your greatest concern. Since the damage is strongly linked to activation of your VGCCs, it stands to reason that areas where VGCCs are the densest would be most vulnerable to damage.

As it happens, the highest density of VGCCs are found in your nervous system, your brain, the pacemaker in your heart and in male testes. As a result, EMFs are likely to contribute to neurological and neuropsychiatric problems, heart and reproductive problems, including but not limited to cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility.

Indeed, this is what researchers keep finding, and all of these health problems are far more prevalent and kill more people than brain cancer.

5G Linked to Significant Health Concerns

One of the main problems with 5G is that it relies primarily on the bandwidth of the millimeter wave (MMW), which is primarily between 30 gigahertz (GHz) and 300GHz,8 and are known to penetrate 1 to 2 millimeters of human skin tissue.9,10

Its ability to penetrate tissue and cause a severe burning sensation is exactly why MMW was chosen for use in crowd control weapons (Active Denial Systems) by the U.S. Department of Defense.11

Some research indicates that sweat ducts in human skin act as antennae when they come in contact with MMWs,12 which helps explain the painful effect. MMW has also been linked to numerous health problems, including:13,14,15,16,17

  • Eye problems such as lens opacity in rats, which is linked to the production of cataracts,18 and eye damage in rabbits19,20
  • Impacted heart rate variability, an indicator of stress, in rats21,22,23 and heart rate changes (arrhythmias) in frogs24 ,25
  • Pain26
  • Suppressed immune function27
  • Depressed growth and increased antibiotic resistance in bacteria28

In 2015, more than 230 scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing EMFs in 41 nations signed an international appeal to the United Nations, calling for protection from non-ionizing EMF exposure due to evidence of health effects even at low levels.29

Two years later, more than 180 doctors and scientists from 35 countries signed a petition30 to enact a moratorium on the rollout of 5G due to the potential risks to wildlife and human health, citing research showing an increased risk for:

  • Cancer
  • Cellular stress and increase in harmful free radicals
  • Genetic damage
  • Reproductive problems31,32,33
  • Neurological disorders

You Run on Bioelectricity

The voltage in your body appears to play a significant role in health and disease. Your body’s production of electricity allows your cells to communicate and perform basic biological functions necessary for your survival.

However, your body is designed to operate at specific levels and frequencies, and being surrounded by manmade EMFs that are a quadrillion times higher than the natural EMF environment of the Earth it is no surprise that this could result in biological harm or damage. As noted in “5G Apocalypse,” interfering with your DNA’s ability to receive and transmit biological signals is just one possible effect of such exposure.

The film also features Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt (whom I’ve also interviewed on the importance of EMF remediation), whose research shows women who gave birth to autistic children had an 8.4 higher body voltage level than those who gave birth to neurologically healthy children. The sleeping location of autistic children also resulted in an 8.5 times higher body voltage.

Overall, the RF radiation level in the sleeping location of mothers whose children were autistic was 20.7 times higher than that of mothers whose children were unaffected. According to Klinghardt, you can actually predict autism simply by measuring the RF radiation exposure levels of the mothers.

EMFs Take a Toll on Neurological Function and Cognition

As early as 1924, Rudolf Steiner, Ph.D., an Austrian scholar who developed biodynamic farming and wrote more than 330 books on a wide variety of topics, spoke about the dangers of electricity and its impact on the human body, saying:34

“You must consider the whole part played by electricity in Nature … [H]uman beings cannot go on developing in the same way in an atmosphere permeated on all sides by electric currents and radiations; it has an influence on the whole development of man …

this life of men in the midst of electricity, notably radiant electricity, will presently affect them in such a way that they will no longer be able to understand the news which they receive so rapidly.

The effect is to damp down their intelligence. Such effects are already seen today. Even today you can notice how people understand the things that come to them with far greater difficulty than they did a few decades ago.”

Since 1924, EMF exposure has increased exponentially, and 5G promises to massively increase that exposure even further, as it adds to already existing technology and doesn’t simply replace it.

Researchers are now confirming what Steiner warned us about in 1924. EMF — today emitted primarily by wireless technologies that didn’t even exist back in Steiner’s day — does indeed have neuropsychiatric effects,35 triggering everything from foggy thinking and headaches to learning disabilities and dementia.

Microwave Radiation Has Clear Biological Effects

About 29 minutes into “5G Apocalypse” you can see what just two minutes of exposure to a smart meter does to human cells. Three different subjects were asked to stand about 1 foot from the smart meter for two minutes. Blood samples were taken before and after exposure.

After this extremely limited amount of exposure, you can clearly see cell wall degradation and trauma to the blood cells occurring in the samples. With its use of “small cell” bases36 placed in close proximity to each other, each and every neighborhood will eventually be bathed in even more powerful 5G frequencies.

What’s worse, the FCC revised its rules relating to the rollout of 5G technology in September 2018, limiting cities’ rights to control the placement of 5G antennas. Los Angeles and other cities sued to overturn the FCC’s new rules, but January 10, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit sided with the FCC.37

As noted by Pall, quoted in the film: “Putting tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.”

Indeed, seeing how many are already struggling with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, saturating cities and suburban areas with MMW radiation will undoubtedly make the problem more widespread, and make life unbearable for those already feeling the effects of wireless radiation.

As noted by Dr. Yael Stein — who has studied 5G MMW technology and its interaction with the human body — in a 2016 letter to the Federal Communications Commission: 38

“Computer simulations have demonstrated that sweat glands concentrate sub-terahertz waves in human skin. Humans could sense these waves as heat. The use of sub-terahertz (millimeter wave) communications technology (cellphones, Wi-Fi, antennas) could cause humans to percept physical pain via nociceptors.

Potentially, if G5 Wi-Fi is spread in the public domain we may expect more of the health effects currently seen with RF/ microwave frequencies including many more cases of hypersensitivity (EHS), as well as many new complaints of physical pain and a yet unknown variety of neurologic disturbances.

It will be possible to show a causal relationship between G5 technology and these specific health effects. The affected individuals may be eligible for compensation.”

Educate Yourself About the Health Risks of 5G and Protect Your Family From Harm

To learn more about 5G and help educate others, you can download a two-page 5G fact sheet39 from the Environmental Health Trust. On their website, you can also access a long list of published scientific studies showing cause for concern.40

To reduce your EMF exposure, read through the suggestions below and implement as many of them as possible. Additional guidance and solutions for mitigating electric and magnetic fields can also be found at the end of “Healthy Wiring Practices,”41 a document created by building biologist Oram Miller, whom I’ve interviewed on this topic.

Nighttime remediation

Use filters to remove voltage transients from your electricity and use meters to confirm that they are in a safe range.
Use a battery-powered alarm clock, ideally one without any light. I use a talking clock for the visually impaired.42
Consider moving your baby’s bed into your room instead of using a wireless baby monitor. Alternatively, use a hard-wired monitor.
If you must use Wi-Fi, shut it off when not in use, especially at night when you are sleeping. Ideally, work toward hardwiring your house so you can eliminate Wi-Fi altogether. It’s important to realize that if you have a Wi-Fi router, you have a cellphone tower inside your home.

Ideally, you’d eliminate your Wi-Fi and simply use a wired connection. If you absolutely must have a router, you can place it inside a shielded bag when not in use. You can find shielded items online, or make your own using Swiss Shield fabric. If you have a notebook without any Ethernet ports, a USB Ethernet adapter will allow you to connect to the internet with a wired connection.

For more extensive shielding, you can consider painting your bedroom walls and ceiling with special shielding paint, which will block RF from outside sources, such as cell towers, smart meters and radio/TV towers. Windows can be covered with metal window screen or film. For your bed, consider a shielding bed canopy.

Daytime strategies to reduce unnecessary EMF exposure

To reduce EMF exposure during the daytime, consider using Stetzer filters to decrease the level of dirty electricity or electromagnetic interference being generated. You can also take these with you to work or when you travel. This may be the single best strategy to reduce the damage from EMF exposure since it appears that most of it is generated by the frequencies that the filters remove.
Connect your desktop computer to the internet via a wired Ethernet connection and be sure to put your desktop in airplane mode. Also avoid wireless keyboards, trackballs, mice, game systems, printers and portable house phones. Opt for the wired versions.
Avoid carrying your cellphone on your body unless in airplane mode and never sleep with it in your bedroom unless it is in airplane mode. Even in airplane mode it can emit signals, which is why I put my phone in a Faraday bag.43
When using your cellphone, use the speaker phone and hold the phone at least 3 feet away from you. Seek to radically decrease your time on the cellphone. I typically use my cellphone less than 30 minutes a month, and mostly when traveling. Instead, use VoIP software phones that you can use while connected to the internet via a wired connection, or better yet, use a landline telephone.

General household remediation

If you still use a microwave oven, consider replacing it with a steam convection oven, which will heat your food as quickly and far more safely.
Avoid using “smart” appliances and thermostats that depend on wireless signaling. This would include all new “smart” TVs. They are called smart because they emit a Wi-Fi signal and, unlike your computer, you cannot shut the Wi-Fi signal off. Consider using a large computer monitor as your TV instead, as they don’t emit Wi-Fi.
Replace CFL bulbs with incandescent bulbs. Ideally remove all fluorescent lights from your house. Not only do they emit unhealthy light, but more importantly, they will actually transfer current to your body just being close to the bulbs.
Dimmer switches are a source of dirty electricity, so consider installing regular on/off switches rather than dimmer switches.
Refuse smart meters as long as you can, or add a shield to an existing smart meter, some of which have been shown to reduce radiation by 98 to 99 percent.44
– Sources and References

Wireless Technologies are very harmful to human health and environment: A Preliminary Review

Wireless Technologies are very harmful to human health and the environment: A Preliminary Review

Click for Document PDF

Is 5G Worth the Risks?

Is 5G Worth the Risks?

In recent months there’s been a lot of talk about 5G – the next generation of wireless technology. 5G is being touted as a necessary step to the ‘internet of things’ – a world in which our refrigerators alert us when we’re low on milk, our baby’s diapers tell us when they need to be changed, and Netflix is available everywhere, all the time. But what we’re not hearing is that evidence-based studies worldwide have clearly established the harmful effects of human exposure to pulsed radiofrequency radiation from cell towers, cell phones and other devices – and that 5G will make the problem exponentially worse.

Most people believe that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) carefully assesses the health risks of these technologies before approving them. But in testimony taken by Senator Blumenthal of Connecticut, the FCC admitted it has not conducted any safety studies on 5G.

Telecom lobbyists assure us that guidelines already in place are adequate to protect the public. Those safety guidelines, however, are based on a 1996 study of how much a cell phone heated the head of an adult-sized plastic mannequin. This is problematic, for at least three reasons:

+ living organisms consist of highly complex and interdependent cells and tissue, not plastic.

+ those being exposed to radiofrequency radiation include fetuses, children, plants, and wildlife – not just adult male humans.

+ the frequencies used in the mannequin study were far lower than the exposures associated with 5G.

5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation uses a ‘cocktail’ of three types of radiation, ranging from relatively low-energy radio waves, microwave radiation with far more energy, and millimeter waves with vastly more energy (see below). The extremely high frequencies in 5G are where the biggest danger lies. While 4G frequencies go as high as 6 GHz, 5G exposes biological life to pulsed signals in the 30 GHz to 100 GHz range. The general public has never before been exposed to such high frequencies for long periods of time.

 

This is a big deal. It turns out that our eyes and our sweat ducts act as antennas for absorption of the higher-frequency 5G waves.[1] And because the distances these high-energy waves can travel is relatively short, transmitters will be required closer to homes and schools than earlier wireless technologies: the build-out will add the equivalent of a cell tower every 2-10 houses.

But former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has made it clear the Telecom-dominated FCC does not put health first: “Stay out of the way of technological development,” he said. “Unlike some countries, we do not believe we should spend the next couple of years studying… Turning innovators loose is far preferable to letting committees and regulators define the future. We won’t wait for the standards.” In response to questions about health concerns, Mr. Wheeler said: “Talk to the medical people”.[2]

Good idea.

The “medical people” have conducted over 2,000 international evidence-based studies that link health impacts with pulsed radiowave radiation from cell towers, routers, cell phones, tablets, and other wireless devices. These studies tell us that RF radiation is harmful at even low and short exposures, and that it impacts children and fetuses more rapidly than adults. Among the findings are that RF radiation is carcinogenic, causes DNA damage, affects fertility and the endocrine system, and has neurological impacts. Pulsed electromagnetic frequencies have also been shown to cause neurological symptoms: depression, anxiety, headaches, muscle pain, attention deficits, insomnia, dizziness, tinnitus, skin tingling, loss of appetite, and nausea.[3]

The U.S. Government has known of these risks since at least 1971, when the Naval Medical Research and Development Command published a bibliography containing 3,700 references reporting 100 biological and clinical effects attributed to microwave and radio-frequency radiation.

Recent findings, such as the $30 million 2018 U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study, have corroborated the findings of all well-designed heart and brain cancer studies of people with 10 or more years’ exposure to cellular radiation from cell towers and cell phones. They all agree: RF radiation causes cancer.[4]

What has been the response to these findings?

Scientists are urging the World Health Organization (WHO) to update its classification of RF from a Group 2B Carcinogen to a Class 1 carcinogen – making RF and 5G comparable to arsenic and asbestos. Annie Sasco, former Chief of WHO’s Research Unit of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention, says, “Enough is enough, how many more deaths would be needed before serious action is taken? Evidence just continues to accumulate.”

Ronald Melnick, the designer of the NTP study, says that the study “shows clear evidence of a causal link between cancer and exposure to wireless cell phone signals.” He adds that “An important lesson that should be learned from the NTP studies is that we can no longer assume that any current or future wireless technology, including 5G, is safe without adequate testing.”[5] Meanwhile, 231 scientists from 42 nations have signed the 5G Appeal, which urgently calls for a moratorium on the technology. Steps are being taken to slow the deployment of 5G in Italy, Belgium, Israel, Switzerland, and The Netherlands, and in the states of California, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Oregon.

But so far, not enough political leaders have been willing to heed the warnings. Or perhaps they are deferring to President Trump, who said that 5G antennas “must cover every community and they must be deployed as soon as possible…. No matter where you are you will have 5G and it is going to be a different life. I don’t know that it will be better… but I can say that technologically it won’t even be close.”[6]

Wireless technology has become so ubiquitous that most of us have been lulled into believing it is safe. Now, the hazards are about to be ratcheted up dramatically. More citizens and legislators need to join those who are actively resisting the reckless push for 5G.

Iishana Artra, PhD is a public health and safety advocate and EMF testing professional in Brattleboro, Vermont.

NOTES:

[1] “The Human Skin as a Sub-THz Receiver – Does 5G Pose a Danger to It or Not?”, and “The Modeling of the Absorbance of Sub-THz Radiation by Human Skin” (Betzalel 2017Betzalel 2018https://principia-scientific.org/study-human-sweat-ducts-act-as-antennas-for-5g-radiation/

[2] “5G network being pushed on the public with zero concern for safety”, Nexus Newsfeed.com

[3] “Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health”, American Academy of Environmental Medicine.

[4] These peer-reviewed published papers are compiled in the BioInitiative Report, which you can view at BioInitiative.org.

[5] Melnick, Ronald, “There’s a clear cell phone-cancer link, but FDA is downplaying it”, The Hill, Nov 13, 2018.

[6] “Remarks: Donald Trump discusses deployment of 5G wireless networks”, Factbase, April 12, 2019.

Stop5G Newsletter May 2019

Stop 5G News – 23 May 2019

Fifth issue of the Stop 5G Space Appeal Newsletter

Mostly in English, but items also in French, German, and some other languages.
Note: this newsletter is A5 so if you print, choose setting “Fit to page” or similar.
(To translate articles or websites, drop text or URL into Yandex Translate at https://translate.yandex.com/translate.)

5G And The IOT: Scientific Overview Of Human Health Risks

by Victor Christianto

5G And The IOT: Scientific Overview Of Human Health Risks

5G is the term used to describe the next-generation of mobile networks beyond the 4G LTE mobile networks commonly used today. Currently there is no standard for 5G networks in place and it will be a combination of a variety of frequencies and modulations. Industry is developing exactly what 5G will be. It is assumed that 5G networks will not become commercially available until 2020 but several cities are rolling out 5G as test areas now.

Published peer reviewed science already indicates that the current wireless technologies of 2G, 3G and 4G – in use today with our cell phones, computers and wearable tech – creates radiofrequency exposures which poses a serious health risk to humans, animals and the environment. Scientists are cautioning that before rolling out 5G, research on human health effects urgently needs to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected. However, instead of prudent public health measures to ensure the public’s safety, governments such as the United States are quickly rolling out 5G networks in neighborhoods and are enacting various state and federal regulations to “streamline” and fasttrack the rollout. These regulations will end the ability of communities to halt and be a part of the decision making process in this massive 5G infrastructure buildout.

THOUSANDS OF MINI CELL TOWERS TO BE BUILT IN FRONT OF HOMES
5G will require the buildout of literally hundreds of thousands of new wireless antennas in neighborhoods, cities and towns. A cellular small cell or other transmitter will be placed every two to ten homes according to estimates. The purpose of this massive infrastructure build out of small cells, distributed antennae systems and microcells is to increase range and capacity in populated urban areas and prepare for the future 5G rollout. 5G frequencies will utilize higher frequencies that do not travel as far as the lower frequencies.

US state and federal governments are moving forth regulations which would make the right of way in front of homes as available sites for 5G transmitters – without consent of the property owners. In response, communities are protesting en mass as they do not want these transmitters built in front of their homes and communities want to be able to regulate the placement on right of ways. Some municipalities are taking the case ​to the courts with litigation.

5G WILL USE HIGHER ELECTROMAGNETIC FREQUENCIES
5G will utilize multiple frequencies from those currently in use for cell phones and wireless to higher millimeter frequencies.

Today’s cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves – a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data.

However, ​5G applications​ will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation.

MILLIMETER AND SUBMILLIMETER WAVES ARE BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE
Current investigations of wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range confirm that these waves interact directly with human skin, specifically the sweat glands. Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics, Hebrew University, Israel recently detailed how human sweat ducts act like an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths.

MECHANISM OF ACTION IS PROVEN
Research already indicates serious adverse effects from the wireless modalities in use today. Research studies from the Dielectric Spectroscopy Laboratory of the Department of Applied Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, headed by Dr. Yuri Feldman, indicate that 5Gs millimeter and submillimeter waves will uniquely interact with human skin and lead to preferential layer absorption. The number of sweat ducts within human skin varies from two million to four million. Replicated peer research of these biological effects in laboratory research has been conducted internationally and scientists consider this mechanism of action well proven (See documentation further down on this webpage).

5G FREQUENCIES ARE USED IN WEAPONS
For years, the U.S., Russian and Chinese ​defense agencies​ have been developing weapons that rely on the capability of this electromagnetic frequency range to induce unpleasant burning sensations on the skin as a form of crowd control. Millimeter waves are utilized by the U.S. Army in crowd dispersal guns called ​Active Denial Systems​. Dr. Paul Ben-Ishai pointed to research that was commissioned by the U.S. Army to find out why people ran away when the beam touched them. “If you are unlucky enough to be standing there when it hits you, you will feel like your body is on fire.” The U.S. Department of Defense explains how “The sensation dissipates when the target moves out of the beam. The sensation is intense enough to cause a nearly instantaneous reflex action of the target to flee the beam.”

HUMAN SKIN WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS AN EXTREMITY ALLOWING HIGHER EXPOSURES
Our skin is our largest organ. Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, Chief Editor of Radiation and Health has stated that the international organization – called ICNIRP –who is developing recommendations for public exposure limits of these higher frequencies is planning to classify all the skin in the human body as belonging to the limbs rather than to the head or torso.

Leszczynski cautioned that, “If you classify skin as limbs – no matter where the skin is – you are permitted to expose it more than otherwise.”

5G DEPLOYMENT WITHOUT HEALTH EFFECT EVALUATION
5G is being developed and implemented without adequate evaluation of the effect of this technology on human health after long term exposure to these frequencies. Peer reviewed research studies have found adverse effects from the electromagnetic frequencies currently in use and that will be in use for this new technology.

“There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers,” stated Ron Melnick, the National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.

In Dr. Cindy Russell’s ​A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a smart nation or contribute to an unhealthy one​ (​Text PDF)​, published in the the Santa Clara Medical Association, Russell states that “3G, 4G, 5G or a combination of zapping frequencies giving us immersive connection and entertainment but at a potentially steep price.” Russell details the scientific documentation on 5G’s frequencies which include arrhythmias, heart rate variability, bacterial affects, antibiotic resistance, immune system affects, chromatin affects, teratogenic effects, altered gene expression and cataracts.

Dr. Cindy Russell lists specific recommendations shared by Environmental Health Trust and scientists worldwide.

RECOMMENDATIONS TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH

  1. Do not proceed to roll out 5G technologies pending pre-market studies on health effects.
  2. Reevaluate safety standards based on long term as well as short term studies on biologicaleffects.
  1. Rescind a portion of Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which preempts state and local government regulation for the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects so that health and environmental issues can be addressed.
  2. Rescind portions of The Spectrum Act which was passed in 2012 as part of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act, which strips the ability city officials and local governments to regulate cellular communications equipment, provides no public notification or opportunity for public input and may potentially result in environmental impacts.
  3. Create an independent multidisciplinary scientific agency tasked with developing appropriate safety regulations, premarket testing and research needs in a transparent environment with public input.
  4. Label pertinent EMF information on devices along with appropriate precautionary warnings.

RESOURCES
This webpage contains lists including recent bioeffects research, videos of expert lectures, and a list of submissions to the FCC on Spectrum Frontiers. Please scroll down for this information. Potential Risks to Human Health Originating from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems Expert Forum Lecture at the Israel Institute for Advanced Study at Hebrew University Medical School, January 24, 2017

Watch a lecture on submillimeter and millimeter frequencies by Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD of the Department of Physics, Ariel University, Israel, ​Full Bio​ and Yuri Feldman, PhD, Head of the Dielectric Spectroscopy Laboratory, Department of Applied Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, ​Full Bio​. Click here for a ​PDF of Abstract for this Presentation

NEWS

Is 5G technology dangerous? Early data shows a slight increase of tumors in male rats exposed to cellphone radiation, ​Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times, Aug 8, 2016
A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a smart nation or contribute to an unhealthy one, Dr. Cindy Russell, ​Santa Clara Medical Association Bulletin Jan/Feb 2017 ​(Page 20 to 23​) (​Text only PDF) The Internet of Things Poses Human Health Risks: Scientists Question the Safety of Untested 5G Technology at International Conference,​ Environmental Health Trust Press Release 3/9/2017 Everything You Need to Know About 5G IEEE​ article

RESOURCES FOR THE COMMUNITY

Why We Should Oppose 5G on Health Grounds, by Dr. Ronald Powell

WHAT ARE 5G AND THE INTERNET OF THINGS? Website: http://whatis5g.info/ ​This website considers all the issues surrounding 5G and the man ways 5G and the IoT will harm humans, the environment, and our Earth from cybersecurity to conflict minerals to health. Citizens’ Cell Tower 5G Information Packet of Montgomery County​: This slide presentation contains key details for communities addressing small cells in their neighborhood.

RECENT MILLIMETER WAVE BIOEFFECT STUDIES

This compilation has included several papers ​compiled from Dr. Joel Moskowitz on his blog SaferEMR​ and from work presented at the​ Israel Institute for Advanced Studies at Hebrew University
Scientific Citations from Potential Risks to Human Health Originating from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems by Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD and Yuri Feldman, PhD

Feldman, Yuri and Paul Ben-Ishai. ​“Potential Risks to Human Health Originating from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems.”​ Abstract, 2017.
Feldman, Yuri, et al. ​“Human skin as arrays of helical antennas in the millimeter and submillimeter wave range.”​ Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 12, 2008.

Hayut, Itai, et al. ​“Circular polarization induced by the three-dimensional chiral structure of human sweat ducts.”​ Physical Review, vol. 89, no. 4, 2014.
Hayut, Itai, et al. ​“The Helical Structure of Sweat Ducts: Their Influence on the Electromagnetic Reflection Spectrum of the Skin.”​ IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, 2013, pp. 207-15.

Professor Yuri Feldman – ​Research Study Summaries, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Department of Applied Physics, Dielectric Spectroscopy Laboratory

RESEARCH ON MILLIMETER WAVES

Haas AJ, et al. “​Effect of acute millimeter wave exposure on dopamine metabolism of NGF-treated PC12 cells​.” Journal of Radiation Research, 2017.
Gandhi OP, Riazi A. ​Absorption of millimeter waves by human beings and its biological implications.​ IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 34, no. 2, 1986, pp. 228-235.

Haas AJ, et al. “​Effects of 60-GHz millimeter waves on neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells using high-content screening.”​ Neuroscience Letters, vol. 618, 2016, pp. 58-65.
Le Dréan Y, et al. “​State of knowledge on biological effects at 40–60 GHz.”​ Comptes Rendus Physique, vol. 14, no. 5, 2013, pp. 402-411.

Sivachenko IB, et al. “​Effects of Millimeter-Wave Electromagnetic Radiation on the Experimental Model of Migraine​.” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 160, no. 4, 2016, pp. 425-8.

Soghomonyan D, K. Trchounian and A. Trchounian. “​Millimeter waves or extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields in the environment: what are their effects on bacteria?”​ Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 100, no. 11, 2016, pp. 4761-71.
Ramundo-Orlando A. ​Effects of millimeter waves radiation on cell membrane – A brief review. Journal of Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, vol. 30, no. 12, 2010, pp. 1400-1411.

REFERENCES ON DEFENSE USE OF MILLIMETER WAVES

US Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program FAQS
A Narrative Summary and Independent Assessment of the Active Denial System The Human Effects Advisory Panel

SUBMISSIONS TO THE FCC ON SPECTRUM FRONTIERS

On July 14, 2016, the ​FCC voted​ to approve Spectrum Frontiers, making the U.S. the first country in the world to open up higher-frequency millimeter wave spectrum for the development of 5G fifth-generation wireless cellular technology. The FCC was flooded with comments in opposition to 5G. ​Read full details at the EHT website on Spectrum Frontiers
The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council Comments to Thomas Wheeler, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission
“Federally-protected wildlife species are in danger”, Briefing Memorandum from Dr. Albert Manville
July 20, 2016 – Dr. Joel Moskowitz Comment to the FCC, “FCC Open Letter Calls for Moratorium on New Commercial Applications of Radiofrequency Radiation”
Dr. Yael Steins Comments to the FCC in Opposition to 5G Spectrum Frontiers Millimeter Wave Technology
Dr. Ronald M. Powell Ph.D. Comment to the FCC
Dr. Devra Davis to FCC, “Long Term Health and Safety Evaluation Needed Before Introduction of 5G”
Comments to FCC by Electrical Pollution, “Parents Write to the FCC: Be on the Right Side of History”
Submission to FCC by Susan Clark, “Stop 5G harm to all living beings: The Science is Conclusive”
Maryland Smartmeter Awareness Comment to the FCC, “FCC Proposed Move to 5G” Comments by Dafna Tachover and “We are the Evidence” to FCC, “Those Injured by Wireless ask Congress: Please Protect us and help protect the public’s health. Say STOP to the FCC and wheeler in 5G vote”
Angela Tsiang to US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

SPECTRUM FRONTIERS RESOURCES

July 14, 2016 FCC Meeting Video Spectrum Frontiers vote.

UN Staff Member: 5G Is War on Humanity

by Claire Edwards, 3 January 2019

The first eight months of WWII with no fighting was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind.

This phoney war is also silent, but this time shots are being fired – in the form of laser-like beams of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from banks of thousands of tiny antennas[1] – and almost no one in the firing line knows that they are being silently, seriously and irreparably injured.

In the first instance, 5G is likely to make people electro-hypersensitive (EHS).[2] Perhaps it was sitting in front of two big computer screens for many of the 18 years I worked at the UN that made me EHS. When the UN Office at Vienna installed powerful WiFi and cellphone access points – designed to serve large, public areas – in narrow, metal-walled corridors throughout the Vienna International Centre in December 2015, I was ill continuously for seven months.

I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres [transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails.

As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMR published over the last 80 years.[3]

Having spent years editing UN documents dealing with space, I know that outer space is hotly contested geopolitically and any untoward event involving a military satellite risks triggering a catastrophic response.[4] Space law is so inadequate – just one example is the complexity of space liability law[5],[6] – that we could really call the Earth orbits a new Wild West. China caused international consternation in 2007 when it demonstrated an anti-satellite weapon by destroying its own satellite. Space debris is the main concern among space-faring nations, with a so-called Kessler syndrome positing a cascade of space debris that could make the Earth orbits unusable for a thousand years.[7] Does launching 20,000+ commercial 5G satellites in such circumstances sound rational to you?

I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us. Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.[8]

Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning:[9] nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?[10]

Seemingly overnight a forest of 5G infrastructure has sprouted in Austria. In the space of three weeks one friend has gone from robust health to fleeing this country, where she has lived for 30 years. Each person experiences EMR differently. For her, it was extreme torture so she and I spent her last two nights in Austria sleeping in the woods. Interestingly, as she drove across southern Germany, she suffered torture even worse than in Austria, while in northern Germany she had no symptoms at all and felt completely normal, which suggests that there has been as yet no 5G rollout there.

There are no legal limits on exposure to EMR. Conveniently for the telecommunications industry, there are only non-legally enforceable guidelines such as those produced by the grandly named International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which turns out to be like the Wizard of Oz, just a tiny little NGO in Germany that appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor or environmental expert.[11]

Like the Wizard of Oz, ICNIRP seems to have magical powers. Its prestidigitation makes non-thermal (non-heating) effects of EMR exposure disappear into thin air, for taking into account the tens of thousands of research studies demonstrating the biological effects of EMR would invalidate its so-called safety guidelines.[12] It has bewitched the International Telecommunication Union, part of the UN family, into recognizing these guidelines.[13] And one little email sent to ICNIRP in October 2018 to submit Professor Martin Pall’s comments on ICNIRP’s new draft guidelines conjured up an immediate explosion of interest in the sender’s online presence – which had hitherto attracted none – from companies and individuals worldwide, one country’s immigration authorities, the office of the Austrian Chancellor (head of government), a firm of lawyers in Vienna and even Interpol![14],[15]

I hope that people read and share our Stop 5G Space Appeal to wake up themselves and others quickly and use it to take action themselves to stop 5G. Even eight short months of this 5G Phoney War could spell catastrophe for all life on Earth. Elon Musk is set to launch the first 4,425 5G satellites in June 2019 and “blanket” the Earth with 5G, in breach of countless international treaties. This could initiate the last great extinction, courtesy of the multi-trillion-US-dollar 5G, the biggest biological experiment and most heinous manifestation of hubris and greed in human history.10

People’s first reaction to the idea that 5G may be an existential threat to all life on Earth is usually disbelief and/or cognitive dissonance. Once they examine the facts, however, their second reaction is often terror. We need to transcend this in order to see 5G as an opportunity to empower ourselves, take responsibility and take action. We may have already lost 80 per cent of our insects to EMR in the last 20 years.[16] Our trees risk being cut down by the millions in order to ensure continuous 5G signalling for self-driving cars, buses and trains.[17] Are we going to stand by and see ourselves and our children irradiated, our food systems decimated, our natural surroundings destroyed?

Our newspapers are now casually popularizing the meme that human extinction would be a good thing,[18],[19] but when the question becomes not rhetorical but real, when it’s your life, your child, your community, your environment that is under immediate threat, can you really subscribe to such a suggestion? If you don’t, please sign the Stop 5G Appeal and get active in contacting everyone you can think of who has the power to stop 5G, especially Elon Musk[20] and the CEOs of all the other companies planning to launch 5G satellites, starting in just 20 weeks from now. Life on Earth needs your help now.

The transcript of my exchange with the UN Secretary-General of 14 May 2018 follows.

[Start of transcript]

Staff member: Mr. Secretary-General

UN staff have repeatedly been told that they are the most important resource of this Organization.

Since December 2015, the staff here at the Vienna International Centre have been exposed to off-the-scale electromagnetic radiation from WiFi and mobile phone boosters installed on very low ceilings throughout the buildings. Current public exposure levels are at least one quintillion times (that’s 18 zeros) above natural background radiation according to Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.

The highly dangerous biological effects of EMFs have been documented by thousands of studies since 1932 indicating that we may be facing a global health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than those caused by tobacco and asbestos.

Mr. Secretary-General, on the basis of the Precautionary Principle, I urge you to have these EMF-emitting devices removed immediately and to call a halt to any rollout of 5G at UN duty stations, because it is designed to deliver concentrated and focused electromagnetic radiation in excess of 100 times current levels in the same way as do directed energy weapons.

In line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to “Protect, Respect and Remedy”, 5G technologies MUST be subjected to an independent health and safety assessment before they are launched anywhere in the world.

There is currently an international appeal (https://www.emfscientist.org/index. php/emf-scientist-appeal) signed by 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations urging the UN and particularly the WHO to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development.

Mr. Secretary-General, we have a unique opportunity here at the UN Office at Vienna. Since our medical records are digitized, you have the possibility of releasing data on a closed population exposed to off-the-scale levels of electromagnetic radiation to establish if there have already been abnormal health consequences for the UN staff here in the last 28 months.

I urge you to do so and stop any 5G rollout in these buildings immediately.

Thank you.

UN Secretary-General: Sorry, because you are talking to someone who is a little bit ignorant on these things. You’re talking about the WiFi systems?

Staff member: On the ceilings of these buildings, WiFi boosters and cell phone boosters were installed without consultation, without information to staff in December 2015. Now, if you understand electromagnetic radiation, the signal is – if you cannot get a signal from your mobile phone, the signal goes to maximum strength and that then bounces off metal walls affecting the body multiple times at maximum exposure levels. So the situation here is extremely dangerous. I have heard anecdotally of many people who have had health problems. I don’t know if they are related but the Precautionary Principle would dictate that we use our medical records to look into this and that we remove these dangerous devices immediately. Thank you.

UN Secretary-General: Well, I’m worried because I put those devices in my house. [Laughter & applause]

Staff member: Not a good idea!

UN Secretary-General: This I will have to – I confess my ignorance on this but I’m going to raise this with WHO [World Health Organization] – which I think is the organization that might be able to deal with it properly for them to put someonetheir staff or organizations to work on that because I must confess I was not aware of that danger – [humorously] to the extent that I put those things in the rooms of my housein the ceiling.

Staff member: I would suggest that everybody start looking into this issue and particularly into 5G, which 237 scientists from 41 countries consider a threat that is far worse than the tobacco and asbestos threats of the past.

UN Secretary-General: Well, maybe I have learned something completely new. I hope it will be very useful to me but I confess it is the first time I hear about it.

[End of transcript]

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the authors of the Stop 5G Appeal.

Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Since May 2018, she has collaborated with Arthur Firstenberg to publish the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (www.5gspaceappeal.org). The Appeal has attracted over 30,000 individual and group signatories from 100 countries, but still needs to reach many more people.

Donations are urgently needed to publicize the Stop 5G Space Appeal further and educate people throughout the world about the threat from 5G, especially from 5G satellites, set to begin operation as of June 2019 and blanket the Earth with 5G, from which there would be no escape for any living organism anywhere on the planet (www.5gspaceappeal.org/donate/).

Claire Edwards can be contacted at stop5gappeal@protonmail.com.
Arthur Firstenberg can be contacted at spaceappeal@fastmail.fm or www.5gspaceappeal.org/contact/.

The Appeal is available in Chinese (中文), Japanese (日本語), Croatian (Hrvatski), Czech (Český), Danish (Dansk), Finnish (Suomi), French (Français), German (Deutsch), Greek (Ελληνική), Hungarian (Magyar), Italian (Italiano), Norwegian (Norsk), Polish (Polski), Portuguese (Português), Romanian (Română), Russian (Русский), Serbian (Српски), Spanish (Español) and Turkish (Türkçe) and will soon also be available in Dutch, Macedonian, Mongolian, and Swedish (www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/). We are seeking volunteer translators for other languages.


References

[1] Delos, Peter. “The Way to a New Phased Array Radar Architecture.” TechTime: Electronics & Technology News. January 15, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://techtime.news/2018/01/ 15/analog-devices-phased-array-radar/. “Although there is a lot of discussion of massive MIMO and automotive radar, it should not be forgotten that most of the recent radar development and beamforming R&D has been in the defense industry, and it is now being adapted for commercial applications. While phased array and beamforming moved from R&D efforts to reality in the 2000s, a new wave of defense focused arrays are now expected, enabled by industrial technology offering solutions that were previously cost prohibitive.”

[2] “Electrosensitive Testimonials.” We Are The Evidence. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. http://wearetheevidence.org/adults-who-developed-electro-sensitivity/. “WATE intends to expose the suppressed epidemic of sickness, suffering and human rights crisis created by wireless technology radiation; elevate the voice of those injured; defend and secure their rights and compel society and governments to take corrective actions and inform the public of the harm.”

[3] Glaser, Lt. Z. “Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-frequency Radiation: Report, Supplements (no. 1-9).” BEMS Newsletter B-1 through B-464 (1984). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Zory-Glasers-index.pdf. Lt. Zorach Glaser, PhD, catalogued 5,083 studies, books and conference reports for the US Navy through 1981.

[4] “Space Sustainability: A Practical Guide.” Secure World Foundation, 2014, 21. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://swfound.org/media/206289/swf_space_sustainability-a_practical_guide_2018__1.pdf.

“However, as more countries integrate space into their national military capabilities and rely on space-based information for national security, there is an increased chance that any interference (either actual or perceived) with satellites could spark or escalate tensions and conflict in space or on Earth. This is made all the more difficult by the challenge of determining the exact cause of a satellite malfunction: whether it was due to a space weather event, impact by space debris, unintentional interference, or deliberate act of aggression.”

[5] “Space Law: Liability for Space Debris.” Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.aviationdisasterlaw.com/liability-for-space-debris/. “Filing a lawsuit against SpaceX for space debris is a little different than one against the commercial industry or state-sponsored launch. Since SpaceX is a private company, injured parties can file claims directly against the establishment in accord with the state’s personal injury laws. For the claim to be successful, the plaintiff will have to prove that SpaceX was negligent in some way that caused the space debris collision. Space law is notoriously complex, making it very difficult for injured parties to recover for [sic] their damages in California.”

[6] Von Der Dunk, Frans G. “Liability versus Responsibility in Space Law: Misconception or Misconstruction?” University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Law: Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications 21 (1992). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/21/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/21&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.

[7] Kessler, D. J., P. M. Landry, B. G. Cour-Palais, and R. E. Taylor. “Aerospace: Collision Avoidance in Space: Proliferating Payloads and Space Debris Prompt Action to Prevent Accidents.” IEEE Spectrum 17, no. 6 (1980): 37-41.

[8] Morgan, L. Lloyd, Santosh Kesari, and Devra Lee Davis. “Why Children Absorb More Microwave Radiation than Adults: The Consequences.” Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2, no. 4 (December 2014): 197-204. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583. Highlights: (1) Children absorb more microwave radiation (MWR) than adults. (2) MWR is a Class 2B (possible) carcinogen. (3) The fetus is in greater danger than children from exposure to MWR. (4) The legal exposure limits have remained unchanged for decades. (5) Cellphone manuals warnings and the 20 cm rule for tablets/laptops violate the “normal operating position” regulation.

[9] Electro Hypersensitivity: Talking to Your Doctor. PDF. Canadian Initiative to Stop Wireless, Electric, and Electromagnetic Pollution. http://weepinitiative.org/talkingtoyourdoctor.pdf.

[10] FCC Chairman on 5G: “We won’t study it, regulate it, have standards for it.” Youtube. June 20, 2016. Accessed January 1, 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwgwe01SIMc. Notes in video: Ultra-high frequency radiation (24 to 100 GHz or more); aimed and amplified signals; massive deployment of towers; worth billions; no standards, no testing; sharing with satellite and military operations; all areas (including rural areas) to be saturated with radiation; all local deployments to be fast-tracked; everything to be microchipped.

[11] Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD. “Is ICNIRP Reliable Enough to Dictate Meaning of Science to the Governmental Risk Regulators?” Between a Rock and a Hard Place (blog), April 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019. https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/type/gallery/. “The major problems of ICNIRP are: (1) it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection; (2) lack of accountability before anyone; (3) lack of transparency of their activities; (4) complete lack of supervision of its activities; (5) skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.”

[12] Matthes, Rüdiger. “EMF Safety Guidelines: The ICNIRP View.” International Telecommunications Union Workshop on Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, May 9, 2013. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/climatechange/emf-1305/Documents/Presentations/s2part1p1-Rued igerMatthes.pdf.

[13] ITU Telecommunication Development Sector Study Group 2: Session on Modern Policies, Guidelines, Regulations and Assessments of Human Exposure to RF-EMF. Session 1: Recent Activities on Human Exposure to RF-EMF in ITU and ICNIRP, Geneva, Switzerland. October 10, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019. www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Study-Groups/2018-2021/Pages/ meetings/session-Q7-2-oct18.aspx. “Session 1 will discuss some of the recent activities held in ITU and describe the latest updates to the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines.”

[14] Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University. Response to 2018 ICNIRP Draft Guidelines and Appendices on Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 KHz to 300 GHz). October 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019. www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FINAL-Martin-L-Pall-Response-to-2018-Draft-Guidelines-8.10.18.pdf.

[15] Cooperation Agreement Between The International Criminal Police Organization Interpol and The International Telecommunication Union. Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-18) Dubai 29 October–16 November 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/18/pp/c/S18-PP-C-0047!!MSW-E.docx. “2. In implementing the Agreement, each Party shall act within their respective areas of competence. More specifically, the implementation of the Agreement by ITU shall not exceed beyond its mandate pertaining to building confidence and security in the use of ICTs, in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 130 (Rev. Busan, 2014) and to its role on child online protection in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 179 (Rev. Busan, 2014), whereas the implementation of the Agreement by INTERPOL shall not exceed its mandate as defined by article 2 of its Constitution which include activities pertaining to cybercrime and online child exploitation”. (emphasis added)

[16] Hallmann C.A., M. Sorg and E. Jongejans. “More than 75 per cent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.” PLOS One 12, no. 10 (2017): e0185809. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809&type=printable. Accessed January 1, 2019.

[17] Laville, Sandra. “Millions of Trees at Risk in Secretive Network Rail Felling Programme.” The Guardian, April 29, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/ apr/29/millions-of-trees-at-risk-in-secretive-network-rail-felling-programme.

[18] May, Todd. “Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?” The New York Times, December 17, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/opinion/human-extinction-climate-change.html.

[19] Davis, Nicola. “Falling total fertility rate should be welcomed, population expert says: figures showing declining birth rates are ‘cause for celebration’, not alarm.” The Guardian, December 26, 2018. Accessed January 3, 2019. www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/26/falling-total-fertility-rate-should-be-welcomed-population-expert-says.

[20] “Planet Earth: Worldwide 5G Radiation from Orbit?” Letter from Claus Scheingraber, Roland Wolff and others to Elon Musk. June 18, 2018. Brunnthal, Germany. “… We are sure that your satellite project is already at an advanced stage. But even if much money has been invested, one should consider that it is only a matter of time until the fact of damaging health potential of mobile communications – and especially of 5G-mobile communication – can no longer we overlooked. Therefore we emphatically recommend not to implement the satellite project.” (Letter in German) (Letter in English)

Cancer-Suicide-Anxiety-Violence @ School: Exploring Causation and Solutions, by Christine Zipps

“The greatest crisis that America faces today, as big as any of our environmental crises is the chronic disease epidemic in America’s children.  The generation of American children born after 1990 is arguably the sickest generation in the history of our country.  With chronic ailments and pediatric rates of some chronic conditions that are the highest in the world.”

-Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – Chairman of the Board & Senior Prosecuting Attorney for Children’s Health Defense


 

LIST of Some of the Topics to be Covered in this Roundtable Session:

  • Health Effects of Non-ionizing Radiation in Children
  • Peer-reviewed, published scientific studies showing biological effects from RFR/EMF
  • Symptoms of Exposure to Microwave Radiation
  • Proven links between EMFs (microwave radiation) emitting from wireless devices and:

Cancer, Depression, Suicide, Violence, Anxiety, Addiction, Isolation, Behavioral Issues, Heart Episodes, Infertility, ADD/ADHD, Compromised Ability to Learn, Reduced Lifestyle and Social Skills, Headaches – Dizziness – Nose/Ear Bleeds – Brain Fog – Difficulty Concentrating, Cancer and Suicide Clusters, etc.

  • Teacher Retention Challenges
  • Compromised Healing (chronic illness cannot heal properly in toxic environment)
  • Alternative Treatment Options to Augment and/or Supplement Traditional Protocols
  • Digital Dementia
  • Solutions – How to Reduce Exposure – “Digital Detox”
  • How to Demand Schools Return to 100% WIRED classrooms & Cancel Cell Tower Leases
  • How and Why Industry & Government Places Profits Before People
  • Measures You Can Take TODAY to Reverse These Trends
  • How 5G will intensify the radiation on our planet and especially within our children.
  • What is the difference between 5G and 5G-Wi-Fi?  – link for more info:

https://www.howtogeek.com/398620/whats-the-difference-between-5g-and-5ghz-wi-fi/

 

LINKS TO STUDIES:

Americans for Responsible Technology: “There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of RF radiation. Here we present some of the most recent.”

BioInitiative Report – 2012–A Rationale for Biologically based Exposure Standards for Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Radiation

The internet information platform EMF-Portal of the RWTH Aachen University summarizes systematically scientific research data on the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF). All information is made available in both English and German. The core of the EMF-Portal is an extensive literature database with an inventory of 28,230 publications and 6,342 summaries of individual scientific studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields.

Link to over 5000 peer reviewed EMF studies:

GEOVITAL: Health issue and associated research (under construction and constant expansion)

 

EMF PUBLICATIONS:

EMF Off!

Screen Time in Schools – Camilla Rees – on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation

Presentation by Dr. Ronald Melnick – “Wireless Radiation Linked to ‘Clear Evidence’ of Cancer” —

Children develop tumors: CELL TOWER ON SCHOOL PROPERTY

Stopping the crisis:  Oregon teachers, parents consider solutions to stop classroom outbursts

Millennials Besieged by Chronic Illness:  From Age 27, It’s All “Downhill

Does Your Child Have Symptoms of Wi-Fi Exposure at School?

Frank Clegg speaks on the danger of Wi-Fi in schools

A Message to Schools about Wireless

Dr. Victoria Dunckley – Electronic Screen Syndrome:  The Overstimulated Child

Dr. Toril Jelter – Health Effects of Non-ionizing Radiation in Children

EMF GUIDE:Five Quick Ways to Reduce EMF Exposure and Boost Your Vitality by Josh del Sol Beaulieu

How to Protect Your Kids from Harmful EMF Radiation by Lloyd Burrell

Children’s Health Defense:  Exposing Causes, Seeking Justice, Protecting Children

“Turn if Off 4 Kids” Initiative Toolkit

10 Elements of an Electromagnetically Clean and Conscious School

LINK TO FLYER:  “Does your child have symptoms of Wi-Fi exposure at school?

Message to Schools and Colleges about Wireless Devices and Health

FEATURED Video: Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe introduces Children with Cancer UK International Conference 2018 in Westminster, London, to dangers of Non-Ionizing Radiation (Timestamp: 07h:08m:15s into the conference ) Alasdair Phillips of CwC introduces Erica and her talk.

Dr. Magda Havas:  Wi-Fi in Schools is Safe.  True or False?

GREAT RESOURCES – PRINTABLES from EHT.org

Wireless Radiation in the School Environment with Dr. David Carpenter

 

To reserve your space in upcoming ROUNDTABLE, simply send email to:  studio_luna@comcast.net with RESERVE in subject line – you will receive confirmation shortly.

Video: 5G Is War on Humanity. Towards An Unspoken Global Health Catastrophe? Claire Edwards

5G is War on Humanity

**

The first eight months of WWII with no fighting was called The Phoney War.

 Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind.

This phoney war is also silent, but this time shots are being fired – in the form of laser-like beams of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from banks of thousands of tiny antennas[1] – and almost no one in the firing line knows that they are being silently, seriously and irreparably injured.

In the first instance, 5G is likely to make people electro-hypersensitive (EHS).[2] Perhaps it was sitting in front of two big computer screens for many of the 18 years I worked at the UN that made me EHS. When the UN Office at Vienna installed powerful WiFi and cellphone access points – designed to serve large, public areas – in narrow, metal-walled corridors throughout the Vienna International Centre in December 2015, I was ill continuously for seven months.

I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres[transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails.

As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMRpublished over the last 80 years.[3]

Having spent years editing UN documents dealing with space, I know that outer space is hotly contested geopolitically and any untoward event involving a military satellite risks triggering a catastrophic response.[4]Space law is so inadequate – just one example is the complexity of space liability law[5],[6] – that we could really call the Earth orbits a new Wild West. China caused international consternation in 2007 when it demonstrated an anti-satellite weapon by destroying its own satellite. Space debris is the main concern among space-faring nations, with a so-called Kessler syndrome positing a cascade of space debris that could make the Earth orbits unusable for a thousand years.[7] Does launching 20,000+ commercial 5G satellites in such circumstances sound rational to you?

I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us. Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.[8]

Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning:[9] nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?[10]

Seemingly overnight a forest of 5G infrastructure has sprouted in Austria. In the space of three weeks one friend has gone from robust health to fleeing this country, where she has lived for 30 years. Each person experiences EMR differently. For her, it was extreme torture so she and I spent her last two nights in Austria sleeping in the woods. Interestingly, as she drove across southern Germany, she suffered torture even worse than in Austria, while in northern Germany she had no symptoms at all and felt completely normal, which suggests that there has been as yet no 5G rollout there.

There are no legal limits on exposure to EMR. Conveniently for the telecommunications industry, there are only non-legally enforceable guidelines such as those produced by the grandly named International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which turns out to be like the Wizard of Oz, just a tiny little NGO in Germany that appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor or environmental expert.[11]

Like the Wizard of Oz, ICNIRP seems to have magical powers. Its prestidigitation makes non-thermal (non-heating) effects of EMR exposure disappear into thin air, for taking into account the tens of thousands of research studies demonstrating the biological effects of EMR would invalidate its so-called safety guidelines.[12] It has bewitched the International Telecommunication Union, part of the UN family, into recognizing these guidelines.[13] And one little email sent to ICNIRP in October 2018 to submit Professor Martin Pall’s comments on ICNIRP’s new draft guidelines conjured up an immediate explosion of interest in the sender’s online presence – which had hitherto attracted none – from companies and individuals worldwide, one country’s immigration authorities, the office of the Austrian Chancellor (head of government), a firm of lawyers in Vienna and even Interpol![14],[15]

I hope that people read and share our Stop 5G Space Appeal to wake up themselves and others quickly and use it to take action themselves to stop 5G. Even eight short months of this 5G Phoney War could spell catastrophe for all life on Earth. Elon Musk is set to launch the first 4,425 5G satellites in June 2019 and “blanket” the Earth with 5G, in breach of countless international treaties. This could initiate the last great extinction, courtesy of the multi-trillion-US-dollar 5G, the biggest biological experiment and most heinous manifestation of hubris and greed in human history.10

People’s first reaction to the idea that 5G may be an existential threat to all life on Earth is usually disbelief and/or cognitive dissonance. Once they examine the facts, however, their second reaction is often terror. We need to transcend this in order to see 5G as an opportunity to empower ourselves, take responsibility and take action. We may have already lost 80 per cent of our insects to EMR in the last 20 years.[16] Our trees risk being cut down by the millions in order to ensure continuous 5G signalling for self-driving cars, buses and trains.[17]Are we going to stand by and see ourselves and our children irradiated, our food systems decimated, our natural surroundings destroyed?

Our newspapers are now casually popularizing the meme that human extinction would be a good thing,[18],[19] but when the question becomes not rhetorical but real, when it’s your life, your child, yourcommunity, your environment that is under immediate threat, can you really subscribe to such a suggestion?

If you don’t, please sign the Stop 5G Appeal and get active in contacting everyone you can think of who has the power to stop 5G, especially Elon Musk[20] and the CEOs of all the other companies planning to launch 5G satellites, starting in just 20 weeks from now. Life on Earth needs your help now.

***

A UN staff member Claire Edwards informs the UN Secretary General of the harm resulting from 5G and wireless proliferation.

The biological effects of EMF radiation are amply documented.

We may be facing a global health catastrophe of the order of magnitude well in excess of tobacco and cigarettes. 

5G is designed to deliver concentrated and electronic radiation.

Scroll down for full transcript

TRANSCRIPT

UN staff have repeatedly been told that they are the most important resource of this Organization.

Since December 2015, the staff here at the Vienna International Centre have been exposed to off-the-scale electromagnetic radiation from WiFi and mobile phone boosters installed on very low ceilings throughout the buildings. Current public exposure levels are at least one quintillion times (that’s 18 zeros) above natural background radiation according to Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.

The highly dangerous biological effects of EMFs have been documented by thousands of studies since 1932 indicating that we may be facing a global health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than those caused by tobacco and asbestos.

Mr. Secretary-General, on the basis of the Precautionary Principle, I urge you to have these EMF-emitting devices removed immediately and to call a halt to any rollout of 5G at UN duty stations, because it is designed to deliver concentrated and focused electromagnetic radiation in excess of 100 times current levels in the same way as do directed energy weapons.

In line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to “Protect, Respect and Remedy”, 5G technologies MUST be subjected to an independent health and safety assessment before they are launched anywhere in the world.

There is currently an international appeal () signed by 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations urging the UN and particularly the WHO to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development.

Mr. Secretary-General, we have a unique opportunity here at the UN Office at Vienna. Since our medical records are digitized, you have the possibility of releasing data on a closed population exposed to off-the-scale levels of electromagnetic radiation to establish if there have already been abnormal health consequences for the UN staff here in the last 28 months.

I urge you to do so and stop any 5G rollout in these buildings immediately.

Thank you.

UN Secretary-General: Sorry, because you are talking to someone who is a little bit ignorant on these things. You’re talking about the WiFi systems?

Staff member: On the ceilings of these buildings, WiFi boosters and cell phone boosters were installed without consultation, without information to staff in December 2015. Now, if you understand electromagnetic radiation, the signal is – if you cannot get a signal from your mobile phone, the signal goes to maximum strength and that then bounces off metal walls affecting the body multiple times at maximum exposure levels. So the situation here is extremely dangerous. I have heard anecdotally of many people who have had health problems. I don’t know if they are related but the Precautionary Principle would dictate that we use our medical records to look into this and that we remove these dangerous devices immediately. Thank you.

UN Secretary-General: Well, I’m worried because I put those devices in my house. [Laughter & applause]

Staff member: Not a good idea!

UN Secretary-General: This I will have to – I confess my ignorance on this but I’m going to raise this with WHO [World Health Organization] – which I think is the organization that might be able to deal with it properly for them to put someonetheir staff or organizations to work on that because I must confess I was not aware of that danger – [humorously] to the extent that I put those things in the rooms of my housein the ceiling.

Staff member: I would suggest that everybody start looking into this issue and particularly into 5G, which 237 scientists from 41 countries consider a threat that is far worse than the tobacco and asbestos threats of the past.

UN Secretary-General: Well, maybe I have learned something completely new. I hope it will be very useful to me but I confess it is the first time I hear about it.

[End of transcript]

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the authors of the Stop 5G Appeal.

Donations are urgently needed to publicize the Stop 5G Space Appeal further and educate people throughout the world about the threat from 5G, especially from 5G satellites, set to begin operation as of June 2019 and blanket the Earth with 5G, from which there would be no escape for any living organism anywhere on the planet (www.5gspaceappeal.org/donate/).

Claire Edwards can be contacted at stop5gappeal@protonmail.com.

Arthur Firstenberg can be contacted at spaceappeal@fastmail.fm or www.5gspaceappeal.org/contact/.

The Appeal is available in Chinese (中文), Japanese (日本語), Croatian (Hrvatski), Czech (Český), Danish (Dansk), Finnish (Suomi), French (Français), German (Deutsch), Greek (Ελληνική), Hungarian (Magyar), Italian (Italiano), Norwegian (Norsk), Polish (Polski), Portuguese (Português), Romanian (Română), Russian (Русский), Serbian (Српски), Spanish (Español) and Turkish (Türkçe) and will soon also be available in Dutch, Macedonian, Mongolian, and Swedish (www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/). We are seeking volunteer translators for other languages.


References

[1] Delos, Peter. “The Way to a New Phased Array Radar Architecture.” TechTime: Electronics & Technology News. January 15, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://techtime.news/2018/01/ 15/analog-devices-phased-array-radar/. “Although there is a lot of discussion of massive MIMO and automotive radar, it should not be forgotten that most of the recent radar development and beamforming R&D has been in the defense industry, and it is now being adapted for commercial applications. While phased array and beamforming moved from R&D efforts to reality in the 2000s, a new wave of defense focused arrays are now expected, enabled by industrial technology offering solutions that were previously cost prohibitive.”

[2] “Electrosensitive Testimonials.” We Are The Evidence. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. http://wearetheevidence.org/adults-who-developed-electro-sensitivity/. “WATE intends to expose the suppressed epidemic of sickness, suffering and human rights crisis created by wireless technology radiation; elevate the voice of those injured; defend and secure their rights and compel society and governments to take corrective actions and inform the public of the harm.”

[3] Glaser, Lt. Z. “Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-frequency Radiation: Report, Supplements (no. 1-9).” BEMS Newsletter B-1 through B-464 (1984). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Zory-Glasers-index.pdf. Lt. Zorach Glaser, PhD, catalogued 5,083 studies, books and conference reports for the US Navy through 1981.

[4] “Space Sustainability: A Practical Guide.” Secure World Foundation, 2014, 21. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://swfound.org/media/206289/swf_space_sustainability-a_practical_guide_2018__1.pdf.

“However, as more countries integrate space into their national military capabilities and rely on space-based information for national security, there is an increased chance that any interference (either actual or perceived) with satellites could spark or escalate tensions and conflict in space or on Earth. This is made all the more difficult by the challenge of determining the exact cause of a satellite malfunction: whether it was due to a space weather event, impact by space debris, unintentional interference, or deliberate act of aggression.”

[5] “Space Law: Liability for Space Debris.” Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP. 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.aviationdisasterlaw.com/liability-for-space-debris/. “Filing a lawsuit against SpaceX for space debris is a little different than one against the commercial industry or state-sponsored launch. Since SpaceX is a private company, injured parties can file claims directly against the establishment in accord with the state’s personal injury laws. For the claim to be successful, the plaintiff will have to prove that SpaceX was negligent in some way that caused the space debris collision. Space law is notoriously complex, making it very difficult for injured parties to recover for [sic] their damages in California.”

[6]Von Der Dunk, Frans G. “Liability versus Responsibility in Space Law: Misconception or Misconstruction?” University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Law: Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications 21 (1992). Accessed January 1, 2019. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/21/?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu/spacelaw/21&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.

[7]Kessler, D. J., P. M. Landry, B. G. Cour-Palais, and R. E. Taylor. “Aerospace: Collision Avoidance in Space: Proliferating Payloads and Space Debris Prompt Action to Prevent Accidents.” IEEE Spectrum 17, no. 6 (1980): 37-41.

[8] Morgan, L. Lloyd, Santosh Kesari, and Devra Lee Davis. “Why Children Absorb More Microwave Radiation than Adults: The Consequences.” Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2, no. 4 (December 2014): 197-204. Accessed January 1, 2019. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2213879X14000583. Highlights: (1) Children absorb more microwave radiation (MWR) than adults. (2) MWR is a Class 2B (possible) carcinogen. (3) The fetus is in greater danger than children from exposure to MWR. (4) The legal exposure limits have remained unchanged for decades. (5) Cellphone manuals warnings and the 20 cm rule for tablets/laptops violate the “normal operating position” regulation.

[9]Electro Hypersensitivity: Talking to Your Doctor. PDF. Canadian Initiative to Stop Wireless, Electric, and Electromagnetic Pollution. http://weepinitiative.org/talkingtoyourdoctor.pdf.

[10]FCC Chairman on 5G: “We won’t study it, regulate it, have standards for it.” Youtube. June 20, 2016. Accessed January 1, 2019. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwgwe01SIMc. Notes in video: Ultra-high frequency radiation (24 to 100 GHz or more); aimed and amplified signals; massive deployment of towers; worth billions; no standards, no testing; sharing with satellite and military operations; all areas (including rural areas) to be saturated with radiation; all local deployments to be fast-tracked; everything to be microchipped.

[11] Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD. “Is ICNIRP Reliable Enough to Dictate Meaning of Science to the Governmental Risk Regulators?” Between a Rock and a Hard Place (blog), April 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.

https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/type/gallery/.

“The major problems of ICNIRP are: (1) it is a “private club” where members elect new members without need to justify selection; (2) lack of accountability before anyone; (3) lack of transparency of their activities; (4) complete lack of supervision of its activities; (5) skewed science evaluation because of the close similarity of the opinions of all members of the Main Commission and all of the other scientists selected as advisors to the Main Commission.”

[12] Matthes, Rüdiger. “EMF Safety Guidelines: The ICNIRP View.” International Telecommunications Union Workshop on Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, May 9, 2013. Accessed January 1, 2019.

https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/climatechange/emf-1305/Documents/Presentations/s2part1p1-Rued igerMatthes.pdf.

[13] ITU Telecommunication Development Sector Study Group 2: Session on Modern Policies, Guidelines, Regulations and Assessments of Human Exposure to RF-EMF. Session 1: Recent Activities on Human Exposure to RF-EMF in ITU and ICNIRP, Geneva, Switzerland. October 10, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.

www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Study-Groups/2018-2021/Pages/ meetings/session-Q7-2-oct18.aspx.

“Session 1 will discuss some of the recent activities held in ITU and describe the latest updates to the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines.”

[14] Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University. Response to 2018 ICNIRP Draft Guidelines and Appendices on Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields (100 KHz to 300 GHz). October 8, 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.

www.5gexposed.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FINAL-Martin-L-Pall-Response-to-2018-Draft-Guidelines-8.10.18.pdf.

[15] Cooperation Agreement Between The International Criminal Police Organization Interpol and The International Telecommunication Union. Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-18) Dubai 29 October–16 November 2018. Accessed January 2, 2019.

https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/18/pp/c/S18-PP-C-0047!!MSW-E.docx.

“2. In implementing the Agreement, each Party shall act within their respective areas of competence. More specifically, the implementation of the Agreement by ITU shall not exceed beyond its mandate pertaining to building confidence and security in the use of ICTs, in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 130 (Rev. Busan, 2014) and to its role on child online protection in accordance to Plenipotentiary Conference Resolution 179 (Rev. Busan, 2014), whereas the implementation of the Agreement by INTERPOL shall not exceed its mandate as defined by article 2 of its Constitution which include activities pertaining to cybercrime and online child exploitation”. (emphasis added)

[16] Hallmann C.A., M. Sorg and E. Jongejans. “More than 75 per cent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.” PLOS One 12, no. 10 (2017): e0185809.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809&type=printable. Accessed January 1, 2019.

[17] Laville, Sandra. “Millions of Trees at Risk in Secretive Network Rail Felling Programme.” The Guardian, April 29, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/ apr/29/millions-of-trees-at-risk-in-secretive-network-rail-felling-programme.

[18] May, Todd. “Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?” The New York Times, December 17, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2019.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/opinion/human-extinction-climate-change.html.

[19] Davis, Nicola. “Falling total fertility rate should be welcomed, population expert says: figures showing declining birth rates are ‘cause for celebration’, not alarm.” The Guardian, December 26, 2018. Accessed January 3, 2019.

www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/26/falling-total-fertility-rate-should-be-welcomed-population-expert-says.

[20] “Planet Earth: Worldwide 5G Radiation from Orbit?” Letter from Claus Scheingraber, Roland Wolff and others to Elon Musk. June 18, 2018. Brunnthal, Germany. “… We are sure that your satellite project is already at an advanced stage. But even if much money has been invested, one should consider that it is only a matter of time until the fact of damaging health potential of mobile communications – and especially of 5G-mobile communication – can no longer we overlooked. Therefore we emphatically recommend not to implement the satellite project.”

(Letter in German) (Letter in English) Claire Edwards

Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Since May 2018, she has collaborated with Arthur Firstenberg to publish the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (www.5gspaceappeal.org).

The Appeal has attracted over 30,000 individual and group signatories from 100 countries, but still needs to reach many more people.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

 

Here’s What Everyone Can Do to Stop 5G

WHAT IS 5G ?

WHY DO WE NEED TO PROTEST ?

WHAT TO DO ?

Today, man-made electromagnetic fields (EMF ) are at astronomical levels.
Our health is deteriorating.  Some people even have what they refer to as
Electro-hypersensitivity syndrome (EHS) and we all do to some degree.

Now, to make things worse, there is an immediate plan to install the next generation of
wireless technology which is called 5G — meaning the “Fifth Generation” — which is the latest generation of cellular mobile communications. The crucial fact to comprehend is that 5G is not just one number ahead of 4G, the fourth generation which we now use for our computer and smartphone.  5G is in another realm, providing speeds over 100 times faster than current data speeds.

This 5G technology which is, at once, immune weakening, carcinogenic, genotoxic, a neurotoxin, and is being sales-pitched as “faster and better.”  And so it is, but at great expense to human health and the local environment.

In reality, we humans and all life will be compromised to the point of being extinguished.
For a clear and scientific discussion of the proven health hazards, please read this International Appeal signed by 63,000 scientists and experts from 168 countries, with over 100 references.


INTERNATIONAL APPEAL: Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

www.5Gspaceappeal.org


Let us proceed with the “Precautionary Principle” as our guide; since the conclusive evidence so far points to extreme danger.  Then we need to take caution and aim to stop the misguided 5G roll-out—POST-HASTE.

HOW CAN WE DO THIS? WHAT TO DO?


*** Print this post as a flyer, or email the link, and share it with family and friends, elected representatives and government officials.


*** Watch this free, very impressive video on the Internet which explains the hidden realities of 5G as no other does.

5G Apocalypse: The Extinction Event 


*** Learn about a legal method to bring accountability to corporate business directors who are implementing the deployment of 5G.   The following video explains how to do this. This method was used to deal with smart meters where the premise and law described prevail.

www.InPowermovement.com

InPower Episode #1: A Mass Action of Liability


*** The following article describes various actions for citizens, including sample
letters to city, county, state and federal officials.  It’s especially focused on 5G cellular
antennas which are coming soon everywhere.

Ten Actions to Help Stop 5G

www.electrosmogprevention.org/stop-5g-action-plan/10-actions-to-help-stop-5G


Stop 5G Radiation


Let’s all terminate 5G, before it terminates us.

10 ACTIONS TO HELP STOP 5G


10 ACTIONS TO STOP DANGEROUS 5G SMALL CELLS  from being placed IN FRONT OF YOUR HOME and throughout your community:

“There have been certain points in our history where people have stood up to strong destructive forces against what often appeared to be insurmountable odds. Those people are THE most honored people in our history. The people who failed to do so are among the most despised people in our history. I am not at all sure we will have historians to record us 100 years from now or even 30 years from now, given the direction in which we are heading. But if we do, rest assured that these are the standards by which we will all be judged.” (Martin Pall PhD, EMF researcher, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University; 2018)

  1. LEARN about 5G concerns – NEW! SUMMARY of all issues concerning 5G for activists and the public

a. The dangers of high frequency rf radiation and 5G. 5G small cells, high frequency microwave-emitting components like mini-cell towers, are planned to be placed in front of our homes, by the street, in the very near future, in your City and County, throughout the United States. The federal government is pushing 5G on a “fast-track”, which could happen by summer, in San Diego County and wherever you live! There is vast consensus that 5G wireless emissions will be dangerous to humans, your pets, animals, insects, and plants – but that hasn’t stopped the federal and local governments from continuing to plan the installment of 5G. The driving force seems to be the greed and clout of the telecommunications industry. Click here to learn more.

b. NO SAFETY TESTING FOR 5G TECHNOLOGIES! Industry leaders, in a Senate hearing on Feb. 6, 2019, admitted there’d been no health or safety testing for 5G technologies that they knew of.

c. WHAT THE FEDERAL GOV’T and INDUSTRY IS SAYING ABOUT 5G: WATCH A U.S.SENATE COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY MEETING HELD ON FEB. 6TH, 2019: “Winning the Race to 5G and the Next Era of Technology Innovation in the United States“.

It is clear that the plan is to saturate the environment, both rural and city, of the entire United States, with hazardous millimeter microwave RF radiation, without consideration for actual public health and safety, though “safety” is used often by speakers as a reason to install 5G across America, and even is stated as a “#1 priority”. Glowing descriptions of “equal access” to wireless completely ignore the warnings of scientists about the hazards of microwave and millimeter wave RF radiation for all biological beings, based collectively, on tens of thousands of studies. Use of all possible places to install 5G in a vast network, including federal lands is also presented. Here is a MUST-READ description of the hearing by an anti-wireless activist, Dafna Tachover.  She says Senator Blumenthal (CT) asked questions about health and safety of 5G and revealed the FCC has not satisfactorily responded to his Dec. 2018 demands for FCC’s 5G health and safety data. Blumenthal begins speaking at 2:04:00 into the hearing and continues for four and a half minutes. Listen to his questions about 5G health and safety and the response from industry. In that short time, Senator Blumenthal got industry leaders to admit they’d not spent one penny on health or safety testing of 5G technology, even while investing $25 billion just last year (as presented earlier in the hearing by Mr. Gillen). TELL YOUR LOCAL GOV’T THAT! NO HEALTH AND SAFETY TESTING AT ALL FOR THIS TECHNOLOGY THAT INDEPENDENT SCIENTISTS INSIST IS UNSAFE. NONE BY GOV’T EITHER.

d. 5G will cause millions of trees to be cut down or severely pruned, [impacting our cities and towns, and your landscaping, in addition to worsening global warming /climate change] in order to allow the 5G signal to have a line-of-sight clearance to operate successfully. Old trees, new trees, the canopy of the trees – cut down to make way for 5G, a concern of the Washington DC Sierra Club. 

More Sierra Club testimony transcript and links here.

NEW! SUMMARY of all issues concerning 5G for activists and the public

2. WRITE letters to all your elected officials – including your Mayors, City Councils*, and County Supervisors. Tell them you don’t want what is basically a microwave-emitting cell tower, in front of your home or on your street! You may not want millions of trees along our streets or potentially, those bordering your yard, cut to allow 5G signals to get through. Express your concern and what you want them to do about it. Educate them about what the scientists are saying about 5G, that the industry admits it did no safety testing, and tell them it is their responsibility to keep your family and the public safe and healthy. That 5G installations are unacceptable in your community.

*Be sure to check with city councilmembers AND city planning departments. City councilmembers may not yet know that these new FCC orders will impact the city’s wireless policies and ordinances. If you want to see if your city has a wireless ordinance, go to your city’s website and then running a search for “wireless”. You should get a department or a document outlining your city’s wireless guidelines/rules. It is important not to wait till your City Council or County Supervisors are voting on ordinance changes. Find out what your current wireless / cell tower ordinances are like now, and educate all the elected officials about the dangers of 5G and options they may utilize to protect the public and keep it out of your municipality.

San Diego County Unincorporated areas map with communities list

San Diego County proposed ordinance changes to fast-track 5G (AKA “draft ordinance”)

Note: this ordinance is for the unincorporated areas of San Diego County, about three-fourths of the County’s area, but it may become a model for the incorporated cities in the County. It is important to have this important initial ordinance become protective of the residents, rather than of the interests of telecommunications companies. That is why EVERYONE in San Diego County, in an unincorporated area or within a city, should write your County Supervisor (or all of them), using your own letter or personalizing one of our examples below.

PRIORITY: Sample Letters A (for use with local governments)

For San Diego County only: 1. (San Diego County Letter to Board of Supervisors)

For Any City or County, Anywhere, USA:

1. Generic, more detailed letter to use with your local County or City government

2. Basic Letter for use with City or County officials – (may be used in San Diego County also – use with County Supervisors AND your City elected officials)

3. More Sample Letters about 5G ordinances for use with local municipalities

Sample Letter B (use with all your elected officials: the White House, your members of Congress, and your state legislators) [Modify a Generic or Basic Letter Above]

Note: San Diego County cities residents click here to get contact info for your State Legislators

Click here to find contact info for the White House, Members of Congress, Governors, State Legislators, and Local Officials

More Sample Letters about 5G ordinances for use with state and federal elected officials

Sample Letter C (post for your FB friends) Copy and paste:

Dangerous 5G cellular antennas are coming to your street and in front of your home, very soon, if not already there. Learn more about 5G and see the CEP “Stop 5G” campaign, complete with ready-made letters to send to your elected officials to wake them up to the dangers. Share this widely! http://www.electrosmogprevention.org/category/stop-5g-action-plan/

3. SHARE what you learn with everyone you know – discuss with friends, family, your child’s school, the PTA, at your church, with your doctor & workplace (if indicated), your entire email list, and through all your social media.  Give them an electronic or print brochure or flyer about 5G dangers and these action steps.  Ask your contacts to share this info with all they know.

4. FIND City or County meetings where they will be discussing “5G” or “small cell wireless” or “wireless ordinances” or “revision of ordinances”.  All may be in preparation to fast-track local laws to usher 5G small cells to be placed on street poles by your home. Better yet, go to the next City or County meeting to tell them about 5G and your opinion. The elected local government officials may think 5G will be great and they must comply with the federal government’s push to force 5G into your community. Tell them they were elected by the local community – and that they have a mandate to maintain the public health and safety.  Consider voting them out if they don’t listen!

ATTEND these meetings with as many of your family, friends, and neighbors as you can.

SPEAK at these meetings to express your concerns, citing what scientists and physicians are saying about the dangers of 5G and insist that these small cells not be placed in your community. Tell them that the new FCC small cell orders are being challenged and that any permanent changes in local ordinances to streamline for 5G can be a mistake.

HOLD PROTESTS OUTSIDE THE MEETINGS – INVITE MEDIA – HOLD A PRESS CONFERENCE – CONSIDER SAFE, PEACEFUL, CREATIVE “DIRECT ACTION” *, which certainly helped gain peace and justice for many important issues, during the past sixty+ years).

*Direct Action (definition): the use of strikes, demonstrations, or other public forms of protest rather than [only]negotiation to achieve one’s demands. May include boycotts.

FOLLOWUP the meetings with letters and attend other related meetings.

5.  TALK TO MEDIA – write local “letters to the editor” and opinion articles; post on local blogs such as the local Patch (online news for small towns); organize and hold press conferences; call national, state, and local media and give interviews to tv and print and online newspaper and magazine reporters in your area. Be prepared with printed documents to prove scientists are saying 5G is dangerous.

6. ADVERTISE: Take an ad out in local newspapers and magazines to inform the public about what you have learned and give them actions to take. You may wish to cite this page.

7. OBJECT if anyone tries to install a small cell near your home, your children’s school, or wherever you are concerned about in your community. Tell the company you have the right to be healthy and you don’t want it there. Take photos and post them. Record what is said; make a YouTube video and share it.

8. BOYCOTT all 5 G products and services. Encourage others to do the same. Tell your wireless companies you plan to do this. Don’t fall for the ads, which don’t mention the dangers and the loss of privacy. Without the public buying 5G it can “go away”. You are in the driver’s seat as a consumer. We don’t need “smart cities” or “smart cars”. We need smart actions! “Smart” usually means unhealthy wireless, so it really is “dumb”!

9. TAKE LEGAL ACTION if indicated. Consider a consultation with local attorneys to ensure your family’s rights to health and safety. See your doctor for a note if anyone in the family is disabled or has a medical condition that might be aggravated by rf radiation.  Write the County or City to demand an accommodation under the laws of your state and the federal government, if applicable. Consider seeking help from an attorney if needed.

10. JOIN CENTER FOR ELECTROMOG PREVENTION to help prevent electrosmog pollution in our communities .

Additional Resources:

The EH Trust has a section called Action on 5G and Doctors’ Letters on 5G Small Cells

[Note: the above is for educational purposes only. These are not to be considered legal or medical advice. Any use of this information falls under our Disclaimer, below.]

USE OF THIS SITE DEPENDS ON AGREEMENT WITH OUR DISCLAIMER: This website is intended to help advance knowledge, provide advocacy, and stimulate further research. While all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure the validity of the information given, no warranty is given towards its accuracy. It is not intended to substitute for medical advice nor as a final statement with regard to possible prevention and avoidance recommendations or potential biological effects. No liability is accepted by the authors for damages arising from its use or misuse and interpretation by others. Wireless devices may vary in their emissions.

 

5G Roll-out Facing $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit

“ONLY A SERIOUS LEGAL CHALLENGE
CAN IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE
CATASTROPHIC DEPLOYMENT OF 5G!”

— Longtime Personal Injury Attorney & Environmental Advocate


 


“Let’s see them square off with a phalanx of personal injury attorneys and cadre of environmental lawyers who will be marshalling through a $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit.”


State of the Nation

That Big Telecom in tandem with government officials really thought they could get way with the 5G roll-out is the greatest example of raw hubris and unfettered arrogance ever displayed in broad daylight.

Truly, that the vested corporate interests along with their enabling governmental representatives attempted to arrogate such sweeping powers unto themselves reflects an extraordinary level of endemic corruption and serial criminality.

The chutzpah and recklessness and audacity and insanity associated with the ongoing nationwide roll-out of 5G exceeds anything ever seen in the history of the United States of America.


“THE 5G ROLL-OUT HAS NOT EVEN BEEN APPROVED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE; NOR HAS IT BEEN PROPERLY EVALUATED BY GOVERNMENT OR STUDIED BY QUALIFIED SCIENTISTS WITHIN THE IT, WIFI AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRIES.”

(Source: 5G ROLL-OUT: An Ongoing National Emergency that Requires an Immediate Shutdown by the American People)


Of course, the biggest concern about what is essentially a military deployment of 5G is that it represents “The Greatest Public Health Disaster in US History”.

A Clear Violation of Everything

Lest the reader wonder exactly what the legitimate legal basis is for this $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit being filed to terminate 5G, please consider the following indisputable points of fact.

The very essence of the 5G roll-out, as well as the manner in which 5G is currently being deployed across the USA, are patently illegal, unlawful and illicit according to many generally accepted legal principles and standards.

This extremely dangerous interstate deployment of 5G is being conducted in such a way that it clearly violates the U.S. Constitution as well as various federal laws, state statutes, county codes and city ordinances.  Such an inherently harmful power grid also transgresses international law, natural law, universal law, divine law and scriptural law.


KEY POINT: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: Why is the UN’s health watchdog allowing humanity’s health to be put in such great danger with 5G and other EMF assaults?


The foisting of 5G digital cellular networks on cities and communities throughout the United States is likewise a clear violation of human rights, civil rights, constitutional rights and natural rights.

In other words, 5G in it’s current form is a “A Clear Violation of Everything”!

Therefore, those individuals and institutions which have attempted to shoehorn this exceedingly destructive technology paradigm into communities will eventually be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

What follows is a statewide initiative that can be taken in any state as a first step to holding the perps in government accountable.  Remember, were it not for utterly corrupt elected representatives and government officials, the 5G rollout could never have been advanced so quickly and stealthily.


5G CRISIS: This is what “torches and pitchforks” looks like in the Digital Age


$1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit

Perhaps the quickest way to bring this 5G government-corporate juggernaut to a screeching halt is to do so with a binding federal injunction.

This necessary legal process can be carried out in a number of ways, but the best is to bring an emergency legal action which can be quickly heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. Similar lawsuits can also be filed on a state-by-state basis where a single victory can set a strong precedent for the rest of the nation.

However, it is the various threats (in the form of enormous legal and financial liability) contained in a $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit that is the most effective way of rapidly chilling the economic and financial forces that are behind the out-of-control 5G freight train.

For it is the stratospheric revenue projections that are associated with both the 5G roll-out and build-out of the Internet of Things (IoT) that have really created this devastating juggernaut to proceed without constraint or proper review.

Therefore, were the moneyed vested interests and major potential investors to understand that their 5G investments could go up in smoke, they would quickly tamp down their wild-eyed enthusiasm.

Herein lies the method for arresting the 5G roll-out in those cities already targeted by the Big Telecom companies which are determined to put 5G in place without an iota of informed consent. See: 5G GENOCIDE: The Most Lethal NWO Conspiracy of the Third Millennium

When the corporate attorneys grasp the sheer enormity and profundity of the upcoming $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit, they will immediately recommend to senior management and board of directors that all 5G deployment operations cease and desist post-haste.

It doesn’t get any better than this legal wrench thrown right into the gears of the 5G juggernaut … where it will remain until the criminally insane psychopaths who advanced the project this far can be arrested, prosecuted and incarcerated for life.

Each and every corporate officer and government official who has conspired to execute this ongoing crime spree must be held to account or else they will be emboldened to try it again.

Severe deterrence is the only sure way to scare these truly predatory capitalists and governmental corruptocrats straight.  Throwing a good number of the co-conspirators in prison would set an example for the rest of the world as well, especially wherever 5G gangsters are running their “Let’s fry humanity!” game.


KEY POINT:

No one is ready for the tsunami of Fifth Generation (5G) radiation that has been unleashed by the Federal Communications Commission, whose only health concern is whether or not 5G will “heat-up” human skin past a certain degree.

Only when 5G is “cooking” human beings will the FCC and the Health and Human Services consider any negative health effects of this new generation of “beyond microwave” 5G millimeter (milli-wave) radiation that will be beamed from 300,000 new cell phone towers in every US community – coming to the utility pole near you. Perhaps the FCC should put their collective heads into a microwave oven, turn it on, and then say that microwaves and milli-waves are harmless.
(Source: 5G: The Most Dangerous Technological Development of the Millennium)


Conclusion

The most meaningful aspect of filing this $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit is that the discovery process will reveal the extent to which so many laws have been outright broken, statutes violated, codes ignored, rules skirted, regulation circumvented, etc.

The fear of so much exposure, alone, will so frighten the 5G movers and shakers that they will scatter like rats fleeing the sinking 5G ship.

Big Telecom, and all the other related industries that hope to gain from this epic crime wave, will vacate the 5G premises so fast so as not to lose their current licenses, certifications and registries necessary to operate in their respective regulated industries.

The bottom line here is that there is a massive criminal conspiracy that has permitted this highly illegitimate enterprise from getting this far.  And, it’s about to be blown wide open.

How exactly things developed to this point of implementation must be investigated so as to preclude a repeat assault on the American people.

Highly destructive and deadly schemes like the 5G roll-out simply never should have made it this far! See ULTRA-SOS: 5G Roll-out Seriously Endangers Every Person on Planet Earth

*This post is the first installment of a 3-part series of this unfolding $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit; please check back for further developments.

State of the Nation
April 12, 2019

Citizen Action Plan

10 ACTIONS TO HELP STOP

Here’s What Everyone Can Do to Stop 5G

BOYCOTT the companies listed in this “5G perpetrators” exposé

5G EMF & Microwave Radiation: How folks can protect themselves where the roll-out is occurring


Editor’s Note

Every concerned citizen is highly encouraged to disseminate the link posted below to the political, legal and judicial class throughout American society.  The volumes of hard scientific evidence regarding 5G-caused medical ailments and health conditions is so conclusive that any sound legal initiative is certain to be successful.  By widely circulating this excellent article, those in the U.S. Civil and Criminal Justice Systems will become acutely aware of what a legal disaster 5G will create—EVERYWHERE IT’S DEPLOYED.  In this way we all can fertilize the soil for the planned $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit.

Wireless Radiation: Stop the 5G Network on Earth and in Space, Devastating Impacts on Health and the Environment 

DARPA’s 5G End Game For Humanity

Left Hook by Dean Henderson

2018 3-13 Caney Mountain Aldo Leopold Cabin Site (14)(Excerpted from Illuminati Agenda 21: The Luciferian Plan to Destroy Creation)

In the late 1970’s scientists at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories were developing what they called a Brain Bomb – a low-frequency energy weapon which could be used on a battlefield to liquidate the brains of thousands of soldiers at one time.

This weapon was likely used by President George H.W. Bush against Iraqi troops during the 1990 Gulf War, when it was reported that thousands of Iraqi Army troops were simultaneously obliterated near Basra.  Their bodies were bulldozed into mass graves and no autopsies were performed.

View original post 1,301 more words

Who’s Behind The 5G Cull Of Humanity?

Left Hook by Dean Henderson

In 1999, HP scientist Richard P. Walker was granted a patent for what would become known as the internet of everything, now better known as 5G. Walker and the rest of his Silicon Valley colleagues had been fed military technology by Lockheed Martin and IBM.

View original post 1,270 more words

5G: The Dominoes Are Starting To Fall

by Claire Edwards

Long-time United Nations staff member Claire Edwards summarizes worldwide developments in the 5G situation. While still far from a victory claim, there is much to be hopeful about as millions around the world deepen involvement and take a stand for our shared future.

UPDATE 17 APRIL 2019: In Switzerland, some cantonal governments have blocked the granting of permits for new antennas or have adopted a 5G moratorium. But the telecoms bought the 5G licenses from the federal government, so they’re using their existing antennas to start deploying 5G. Greater grassroots involvement is needed. The updates we have provided were not a victory call — but rather a reason to hope and a call to join the movement on the ground where you live.

How do you stop the rollout of a 12 trillion dollar technology promoted by one of the most profitable industries on the planet and bulldozed through by the EU, FCC and the whole UN, most notably its WiFi enablers, WHO and ITU?

Many people have said it’s impossible. But even as the Trump administration attempts to ram through 5G in the United States, the dominoes are indeed falling around the world, as cities and entire nations are coming to their senses and putting the brakes on 5G.

Want to know more about 5G? Go here: WhatIs5G.info

Lawmakers hitting the brakes on 5G:

USA, 24 March:Portland Oregon city officials state clear opposition to the installation of 5G networks around the city, supported by the mayor and two commissioners.
Italy, 28 March:Florence applies the precautionary principle, refusing permissions for 5G and referring to “the ambiguity and the uncertainty of supranational bodies and private bodies (like ICNIRP)”, which “have very different positions from each other, despite the huge evidence of published studies”.
Italy, 28 March:One Roman district votes against 5G trials, with others expected to follow. Other motions to Stop 5G are expected in the four regional councils, one provincial council and other municipal councils of Italy.
Russia, 28 March:The Russian Ministry of Defence refuses to transfer frequencies for 5G, which effectively delays any 5G rollout there for several years.
Belgium, 31 March:The Belgian Environment Minister announces that Brussels is halting its 5G rollout plans, saying, “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit.
Germany, 4 April:Germans sign a petition en masse to force the German Bundestag to debate 5G.
Netherlands, 4 April:Members of Parliament in the Netherlands insist that radiation research must be carried out before any approval of the 5G network.
USA, 5 April:California Supreme Court Justices unanimously uphold a 2011 San Francisco ordinance requiring telecommunications companies to get permits before placing antennas on city infrastructure.
Switzerland, 9 April:The Canton of Vaud adopts a resolution calling for a moratorium on 5G antennas until the publication this summer of a report on 5G by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment.
Switzerland, 10 April:Geneva adopts a motion for a moratorium on 5G, calling on the Council of State to request WHO to monitor independent scientific studies to determine the harmful effects of 5G.

Overcoming the roadblocks

For me, it has always seemed an information problem. If the public simply understood the existential threat posed by adopting a military weapon as a communications technology, they would not accept it.

The challenge of informing people is twofold. The name “5G” is deceptive, implying a simple upgrade from the current 4G or fourth generation wireless. [And many WiFi routers now display “5G” as a mode option, but it means “5GHz” in that context, not actual “5G” — an industry ploy to normalize the term’s acceptance through intentional obfuscation. -Ed.]

This ruse cleverly disguises the reality that 5G means densification, with each individual, visible antenna being replaced by thousands of tiny antennas menacing people, animals and nature from every nook and cranny on Earth and from 20,000 or more satellites with lethal, laser-like beams hitting their unwitting targets millions of times a day like silent bullets.

The second difficulty is the tight control of the media. Hardly a whisper of negativity about 5G penetrates the public sphere, while its claimed benefits are constantly touted in puff pieces in newspapers and in numerous promotional videos.

Yet in the space of only a year since we first heard about the impending catastrophe that is 5G, the message has spread virally through the alternative and social media.

5G deserves the bad rap

Since US Senator Blumenthal dealt a major blow to the telecommunications industry by definitively establishing that no safety studies have been done, the bad news on 5G just keeps on coming. At least 21 US cities have passed ordinances restricting “small cell” installation, and many are charging “recertification fees” to make it unprofitable for the wireless industry.

And the UK-based microwave weapons expert Barrie Trower reports that 17 mystery countries are taking steps to avoid getting 5G.

While the EU eagerly promotes the rollout of 5G, a new EU report admits that 5G is a massive experiment, lamenting that:

“[T]he problem is that currently it is not possible to accurately simulate or measure 5G emissions in the real world … concern is emerging over the possible impact on health and safety arising from potentially much higher exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation arising from 5G.”

The EU report goes on to set out the dangers:

“Increased exposure may result not only from the use of much higher frequencies in 5G but also from the potential for the aggregation of different signals, their dynamic nature, and the complex interference effects that may result, especially in dense urban areas.”

Meanwhile, a court in France has recognized electrohypersensitivity (EHS) as an occupational disease that can be developed also from exposure to levels of radiation that are considered to be safe by the government.

No one wants 5G but the telcos

5G is beginning to look like an unwanted orphan. Everyone who hears the truth about it shuns it like the plague. Even most of its proponents clearly have no love for it.

In his Palm Beach neighborhood, President Trump and his fellow billionaires are not having any of it. None of the EU institutions in Brussels are having it (European Commission, Council of the European Union, European Council and the European Parliament). And its very enablers, the UN and its WHO and ITU are not going to be having it in Geneva, either.

Watch for moratoria being declared in Washington, D.C., home to the FCC; and Munich, nearby home to ICNIRP. Either would be an obvious indicator that the game is rigged.

Unless this insane 5G satellite plan is stopped, they, too, might wake up to find themselves as much guinea pigs as everyone else in this massive biological experiment.

But one wonders how the 5G movers and shakers will avoid the satellites, which the 5G literature boasts as being intended to “blanket” the Earth. Perhaps the satellite beams will avoid the areas where they live. Or perhaps not. Unless this insane 5G satellite plan is stopped, they, too, might wake up to find themselves as much guinea pigs as the rest of us in this massive biological experiment.

While well over ten thousand peer-reviewed scientific studies on the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation provide a clear perspective on the unprecedented risk of 5G, the rhetoric from the corporate media would have you believe that it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread. One thing we can agree on: if we were to allow 5G to go ahead, it would make history. What a pity, then, that it would leave no one standing to celebrate it.

The tide is turning in our favour because people like you, dear reader, are becoming educated and involved. You are sharing information and speaking with leaders. Thanks to your willingness to stand up for life and love, we will succeed in this great battle of our time.

References

Washington Post: 5G is about to get a big boost from Trump and the FCC. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/12/g-is-about-get-big-boost-trump-fcc/?utm_term=.c9e453858d1a

EDN Network: 5G: The twelve trillion dollar technology. 3 May 2017. https://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/5g-waves/4458362/5G–The-twelve-trillion-dollar-technology.

Digital Survivor: Portland Officials Attempt to Block 5G. 26 March 2019. https://digitalsurvivor.uk/2019/03/26/portland-officials-attempt-to-block-5g/

Oasi Sana: “Provoca danni al corpo!” Firenze frena sul 5G e applica il Principio di Precauzione. Approvata con voto (quasi) unanime la mozione in difesa della salute. 5 April 2019. https://oasisana.com/2019/04/05/provoca-danni-al-corpo-firenze-frena-sul-5g-e-applica-il-principio-di-precauzione-approvata-con-voto-quasi-unanime-la-mozione-in-difesa-della-salute-notizia-esclusiva-oasi-sana/

Terra Nuova.it: Un Municipio di Roma vota contro il 5G: cosa farà la Giunta? (A municipality of Rome votes against 5G: What will the City Council do?) www.terranuova.it/News/Attualita/Un-Municipio-di-Roma-vota-contro-il-5G-cosa-fara-la-Giunta

Vedomosti: Минобороны отказалось передавать операторам частоты для 5G (Ministry of Defence refusing to transfer frequencies for 5G to operators). 28 March 2019. https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/articles/2019/03/28/797714-minoboroni-otkazalos-peredavat-5g

Brussels Times: Radiation concerns halt Brussels 5G development, for now. 1 April 2019. http://www.brusselstimes.com/brussels/14753/radiation-concerns-halt-brussels-5g-for-now

Telecom Paper: Germans petition Parliament to stop 5G auction on health grounds. 8 April 2019. https://www.telecompaper.com/news/ germans-petition-parliament-to-stop-5g-auction-on-health-grounds–1287962

Algemeen Dagblad: Kamer wil eerst stralingsonderzoek, dan pas 5G-netwerk. 4 April 2019. https://www.ad.nl/tech/kamer-wil-eerst-stralingsonderzoek-dan-pas-5g-netwerk~ab567cd6/

Zero5G: San Francisco Chronicle: California Supreme Court Sides with Cities in Small Cell Faceoff. 5 April 2019. https://zero5g.com/2019/california-supreme-court-sides-with-cities-in-small-cell-faceoff/

Take Back Your Power: 5G: Vaud (Switzerland) Adopts Resolution for a Moratorium. 9 April 2019. https://takebackyourpower.net/5g-vaud-switzerland-adopts-moratorium/

Le Temps: Genève adopte une motion pour un moratoire sur la 5G. 11 April 2019. https://www.letemps.ch/suisse/geneve-adopte-une-motion-un-moratoire-5g

US Department of Defense: Active Denial Technology. Non-Lethal Weapons Program. https://jnlwp.defense.gov/Press-Room/Fact-Sheets/Article-View-Fact-sheets/Article/577989/active-denial-technology/. Published May 11, 2016.

Wireless Industry Confesses “No Studies Show 5G is Safe”. US Senator Blumenthal Raises Concerns on 5G Wireless Technology Health Risks at Senate Hearing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekNC0J3xx1w

EH Trust: USA City Ordinances To Limit And Control Wireless Facilities Small Cells In Rights Of Ways. https://ehtrust.org/usa-city-ordinances-to-limit-and-control-wireless-facilities-small-cells-in-rights-of-ways/

5G Gigantic health hazard – Barrie Trower & Sir Julian Rose. Video. 14 December 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLVIbPtNrVo.

European Parliament: 5G Deployment: State of Play in Europe, USA and Asia. April 2019. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/631060/IPOL_IDA(2019)631060_EN.pdf

Zero5G: French court Recognizes EHS as an Occupational Disease. 2 April 2019. https://zero5g.com/2019/french-court-recognizes-ehs-as-an-occupational-disease/

Activist Post: Are Palm Beach and Trump’s Estate Exempt from Legislation Forcing 5G Small Cell Tower Installation Everywhere Else? 27 December 2018. https://www.activistpost.com/2018/12/are-palm-beach-and-trumps-estate-exempt-from-legislation-forcing-5g-small-cell-tower-installation-everywhere-else.html


 

THE BIOINITIATIVE REPORT 2012

BioInitiative Report 2012 A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)THE BIOINITIATIVE REPORT 2012

There is more evidence than we need.

The last five years worth of new scientific studies tell us the situation is much worse than in 2007 and yet people around the world have so much more daily exposure than even five years ago. Exposures are linked to a variety of adverse health outcomes that may have significant public health consequences. When added across billions of people world-wide, no argument for the status quo can be persuasive now.

In twenty-one technical chapters of this 2012 update, the contributing authors discuss the content and implications of about 1800 new studies. Overall, there is reinforced scientific evidence of risk where there is chronic exposure to low-intensity electromagnetic fields and to wireless technologies (radiofrequency radiation including microwave radiation).

There is more evidence in 2012 that such exposures damage DNA, interfere with DNA repair, evidence of toxicity to the human genome (genes), more worrisome effects on the nervous system (neurology) and more and better studies on the effects of mobile phone base stations (wireless antenna facilities or cell towers) that report lower RFR levels over time can result in adverse health impacts. There has been a big increase in the number of studies looking at the effects of cell phones (on the belt, or in the pocket of men radiating only on standby mode) and from wireless laptops on impacts to sperm quality and motility; and sperm death (fertility and reproduction).

In other new studies of the fetus, infant and young child, and child-in-school – there are a dozen or more new studies of importance.

The 2007 BioInitiative Report was prepared by world- recognized experts in science and public health policy.  Outside reviewers also contributed valuable content and perspective. It was concluded even in 2007 that existing public safety limits were inadequate to protect public health, and agreed that new, biologically- based public safety limits were needed five years ago. The public health cost of doing nothing was judged to be unacceptable in 2007.   This did nothing to change the rules, nor roll back the technology tsunami of wireless-everywhere.

The levels of exposure we face in 2012 are higher, and have crept into every day life, even for children.  The levels at which undesirable effects on health and well-being are seen is much lower. The levels of concern  at have dropped lower in 2012 by 10s to 100s of times.  There is much greater involuntary exposure, and it is nearly unavoidable even for people who choose not to ‘go wireless’ (second-hand radiation effects).  Safe forms of communication by land-line telephone are being phased out without general public knowledge or agreement.  There is no informed consent for consumers (warning labels on cell phones, for example, have been defeated by telecom industry lobby groups).  It is still difficult or impossible for a consumer to get reliable information on levels of exposure from wireless devices, It is simply beyond the reach of people to identify where excessively high levels of exposure occur in their communities, and it is very rare for a county or state health department to accommodate requests for information or provide measurements.

Today the evidence is stronger than ever and it may be placing people at risk, but most people have no idea.  There is little indication that cell phone users (whose numbers have risen from roughly 2 billion in 2006 to 6 billion users globally in 2012) are aware of the risks.  In that time, whole-body exposures from other RFR sources like WI-FI, WI-MAX, smart grids using wireless utility meters, and vast commercial applications of wireless RFR (in commerce, transportation, in banking, in surveillance and monitoring, in medical imaging and ironically in health care record-keeping and learning environments for education – all these new applications of wireless over wired communications and data transmission add to the RFR saturation in cities. Wireless laptops and wireless internet in schools, and home offices and for homework mean even more chronic exposures to RFR, a designated IARC 2B Possible Human Carcinogen (May 31, 2011).

The range of possible health effects that are adverse with chronic exposures has broadened. The most serious health endpoints that have been reported to be associated with extremely low frequency (ELF) and/or radiofrequency radiation (RFR) include childhood and adult leukemia, childhood and adult brain tumors, and increased risk of the neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Recent studies largely reinforce the potential risks to health (rather than reducing our concerns, or providing actual indications of safety). In addition, there are reports of increased risk of breast cancer in both men and women, genotoxic effects (DNA damage, chromatin condensation, micronucleation, impaired repair of DNA damage in human stem cells), pathological leakage of the blood–brain barrier, altered immune function including increased allergic and inflammatory responses, miscarriage and some cardiovascular effects. Insomnia (sleep disruption) is reported in studies of people living in very low-intensity RFR environments with WI-FI and cell tower-level exposures. Short-term effects on cognition, memory and learning, behavior, reaction time, attention and concentration, and altered brainwave activity (altered EEG) are also reported in the scientific literature. Biophysical mechanisms that may account for such effects can be found in various articles and reviews.

We could do otherwise. Each wireless need had a wired solution in counterpart that has none of the health effects that wireless RFR does, with the exception of cell phone use for talking directly to someone. It is time to re-think the wireless tsunami and educate people about health, privacy and security risks. It is past time to develop new safety standards. It is necessary now to look to less harmful ways to communicate, move ourselves from place to place, shop, sleep, recreate, save energy, and educate our children in school. It is time to rethink our global commerce, energy, banking, transportation and communications infrastructures so we are all committed to sustaining healthy living spaces and conserve safe sanctuary for all species on earth.

 

Continue

 

Letter to Syracuse Council, Mayor, and Councilor Opposing 5G Implementation

For the attention of Ben Walsh, Mayor; Helen Hudson, President, Syracuse Common Council; and Councilor Bryn Lovejoy-Grinnell
Subject: Verizon is wrong: 5G is VERY different from 4G and all other previous generations of wireless services, in terms of radio frequency transmission

Dear Mr Walsh, Ms Hudson and Mr Lovejoy-Grinnell (copied to other Syracuse concerned parties)
I see that Syracuse is debating whether to allow Verizon to install 5G wireless networks throughout the city and that Verizon’s regulatory manager, Mr. Mark Coon, is quoted as stating that “Wireless technology for wireless communications transmits radio frequency signals over the airwaves, no different than your garage door opener, or a baby monitor or a Wi-Fi router in your home” and that “5G is no different than 4G, is no different than any of the generations of wireless services, as far as that radio frequency transmission. [sic]” (https://www.wrvo.org/post/syracuse-councilors-question-potential-health-risks-5g)
Verizon is lying to you
Mr Coon is either monstrously ignorant, criminally lying, or both.  5G is totally different from previous generations of wireless technology. It will use millimeter waves rather than microwaves and will require a great deal more power behind it to push it through walls.  It will use phased arrays involving up to, or more than, a thousand antennas that turn the signal into a laser-like beam that does not attenuate over distance in the way that 4G does.  These phased array antennas will be situated only a few meters apart, potentially beaming directly into every third or so home. In addition to ground-based 5G, 23,000 satellites are being launched to beam 5G from space, with the stated intention of “blanketing” the Earth, making escape from this RF radiation completely impossible.  5G from space will be in addition to 5G on the ground, which in turn will be in addition tothe existing 2G, 3G and 4G.  The densification required for 5G and its massive intensity, as well as its proposed ubiquitousness, make it an incalculable but potentially deadly hazard to all life on the planet. 

5G was never tested for health or safety
All of this would be bad enough, but 5G has NEVER been tested for health or safety.  This puts those responsible for its rollout squarely in line for prosecution under the Nuremberg Code, which makes it a crime against humanity to subject humans to experimentation without informed consent.  The 5G rollout is also in breach of a host of international treaties and conventions.
Lawmakers around the world are waking up to the dangers of 5G
A number of lawmakers in various countries have now put the brakes on 5G (https://takebackyourpower.net/5g-the-dominoes-are-starting-to-fall/) and Syracuse Common Council would do well to follow suit.

Devastating biological effects
There are tens of thousands of studies demonstrating the devastating biological effects of electromagnetic radiation, going right back to 1932 and beyond.  The US military has compiled thousands of them for purposes of developing microwave weapons.  The beam-forming aspects and high frequencies to be used by 5G make it exponentially more dangerous than previous generations of wireless technology.  Professor Emeritus Martin Pall has called 5G the stupidest idea in all of human history. It is the biggest biological experiment in all of human history.

You have a duty to inform yourselves
Please take the time to read our International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space and inform yourselves before you decide to collaborate with this 5G humanitarian crime.  It may be found at https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal.

You may also find watching this documentary compilation of all the testimonials from scientists and weapons experts against 5G instructive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol3tAxnNccY.

Best regards

Claire Edwards
International Appeal to Stop 5Gon Earth and in Space
www.5gspaceappeal.org/

 

 

INTERNATIONAL APPEAL Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

Bee-BannerImage.jpg

INTERNATIONAL APPEAL
Stop 5G on Earth and in Space


There are 83,032 signatories from at least 168 countries as of April 27, 2019


To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe
and governments of all nations

We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.

Executive summary

Telecommunications companies worldwide, with the support of governments, are poised within the next two years to roll out the fifth-generation wireless network (5G). This is set to deliver what is acknowledged to be unprecedented societal change on a global scale. We will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart” cities and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips and will be connected wirelessly to the Internet. Every person on Earth will have instant access to super-high-speed, low- latency wireless communications from any point on the planet, even in rainforests, mid-ocean and the Antarctic.

What is not widely acknowledged is that this will also result in unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned density of radio frequency transmitters is impossible to envisage. In addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one trillion objects a few years later. Commercial 5G at lower frequencies and slower speeds was deployed in Qatar, Finland and Estonia in mid-2018. The rollout of 5G at extremely high (millimetre wave) frequencies is planned to begin at the end of 2018.

Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.

If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.

Immediate measures must be taken to protect humanity and the environment, in accordance with ethical imperatives and international agreements.

5G will result in a massive increase in inescapable, involuntary exposure to wireless radiation

Ground-based 5G

In order to transmit the enormous amounts of data required for the Internet of Things (IoT), 5G technology, when fully deployed, will use millimetre waves, which are poorly transmitted through solid material. This will require every carrier to install base stations every 100 metres[1] in every urban area in the world. Unlike previous generations of wireless technology, in which a single antenna broadcasts over a wide area, 5G base stations and 5G devices will have multiple antennas arranged in “phased arrays” [2],[3] that work together to emit focused, steerable, laser-like beams that track each other.

Each 5G phone will contain dozens of tiny antennas, all working together to track and aim a narrowly focused beam at the nearest cell tower. The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted rules [4] permitting the effective power of those beams to be as much as 20 watts, ten times more powerful than the levels permitted for current phones.

Each 5G base station will contain hundreds or thousands of antennas aiming multiple laser-like beams simultaneously at all cell phones and user devices in its service area. This technology is called “multiple input multiple output” or MIMO. FCC rules permit the effective radiated power of a 5G base station’s beams to be as much as 30,000 watts per 100 MHz of spectrum,[4] or equivalently 300,000 watts per GHz of spectrum, tens to hundreds of times more powerful than the levels permitted for current base stations.

Space-based 5G

At least five companies[5] are proposing to provide 5G from space from a combined 20,000 satellites in low- and medium-Earth orbit that will blanket the Earth with powerful, focused, steerable beams. Each satellite will emit millimetre waves with an effective radiated power of up to 5 million watts[6] from thousands of antennas arranged in a phased array. Although the energy reaching the ground from satellites will be less than that from ground-based antennas, it will irradiate areas of the Earth not reached by other transmitters and will be additional to ground-based 5G transmissions from billions of IoT objects. Even more importantly, the satellites will be located in the Earth’s magnetosphere, which exerts a significant influence over the electrical properties of the atmosphere. The alteration of the Earth’s electromagnetic environment may be an even greater threat to life than the radiation from ground-based antennas (see below).

Harmful effects of radio frequency radiation are already proven

Even before 5G was proposed, dozens of petitions and appeals[7] by international scientists, including the Freiburger Appeal signed by over 3,000 physicians, called for a halt to the expansion of wireless technology and a moratorium on new base stations.[8]

In 2015, 215 scientists from 41 countries communicated their alarm to the United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO).[9] They stated that “numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF [electromagnetic fields] affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. More than 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies demonstrate harm to human health from RF radiation.[10] [11] Effects include:

Effects in children include autism,[28] attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)[29][30] and asthma.[31]

Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is abundant evidence of harm to diverse plant- and wildlife[32][33] and laboratory animals, including:

Negative microbiological effects[48] have also been recorded.

The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded in 2011 that RF radiation of frequencies 30 kHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).[49] However, recent evidence, including the latest studies on cell phone use and brain cancer risks, indicate that RF radiation is proven carcinogenic to humans[50] and should now be classified as a “Group 1 carcinogen” along with tobacco smoke and asbestos.

Most contemporary wireless signals are pulse-modulated. Harm is caused by both the high-frequency carrier wave and the low-frequency pulsations.[51]

The deployment of 5G satellites must be prohibited

The Earth, the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere form the global electric circuit[52] in which we live. It is well established that biological rhythms—of humans,[53][54] birds,[55] hamsters,[56] and spiders[57][58]—are controlled by the Earth’s natural electromagnetic environment and that the well-being of all organisms depends on the stability of this environment, including the electrical properties of the atmosphere.[59][60][61][62] Cherry, in a groundbreaking paper, [63] explained the importance of the Schumann resonances[64] and why ionospheric disturbances can alter blood pressure and melatonin and cause “cancer, reproductive, cardiac and neurological disease and death”.

These elements of our electromagnetic environment have already been altered by radiation from power lines. Power line harmonic radiation[65] reaches the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere, where it is amplified by wave-particle interactions.[66][67] In 1985, Dr. Robert O. Becker warned that power line harmonic radiation had already changed the structure of the magnetosphere, and that the continued expansion of this effect “threatens the viability of all life on Earth”.[68] The placement of tens of thousands of satellites directly in both the ionosphere and magnetosphere, emitting modulated signals at millions of watts and millions of frequencies, is likely to alter our electromagnetic environment beyond our ability to adapt.[69]

Informal monitoring has already provided evidence indicating serious effects on humans and animals from the approximately 100 satellites that have provided 2G and 3G phone service from low orbit since 1998. Such effects cannot be understood only from consideration of the low levels of radiation on the ground. Knowledge from other relevant scientific disciplines must be taken into account, including the fields of atmospheric physics and acupuncture.[70][71][72][73] Adding 20,000 5G satellites will further pollute the global electric circuit[74][75] and could alter the Schumann resonances,[76] with which all life on Earth has evolved. The effects will be universal and may be profoundly damaging.

5G is qualitatively and quantitatively different from 4G

The idea that we will tolerate tens to hundreds of times more radiation at millimetre wavelengths is based on faulty modelling of the human body as a shell filled with a homogeneous liquid.[77][78] The assumption that millimetre waves do not penetrate beyond the skin completely ignores nerves,[79] blood vessels[80][81] and other electrically conducting structures that can carry radiation-induced currents deep into the body.[82][83][84] Another, potentially more serious error is that phased arrays are not ordinary antennas. When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow. But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that reradiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body. These reradiated waves are called Brillouin precursors.[85] They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough.[86] 5G will probably satisfy both criteria.

In addition, shallow penetration in itself poses a unique danger to eyes and to the largest organ of the body, the skin, as well as to very small creatures. Peer-reviewed studies have recently been published, predicting thermal skin burns[87] in humans from 5G radiation and resonant absorption by insects,[88] which absorb up to 100 times as much radiation at millimetre wavelengths as they do at wavelengths presently in use. Since populations of flying insects have declined by 75-80 per cent since 1989 even in protected nature areas,[89] 5G radiation could have catastrophic effects on insect populations worldwide. A 1986 study by Om Gandhi warned that millimetre waves are strongly absorbed by the cornea of the eye, and that ordinary clothing, being of millimetre-size thickness, increases the absorption of energy by the skin by a resonance-type effect.[90] Russell (2018) reviews the known effects of millimetre waves on skin, eyes (including cataracts), heart rate, immune system and DNA.[91]

Regulators have deliberately excluded the scientific evidence of harm

Stakeholders thus far in the development of 5G have been industry and governments, while renowned international EMF scientists who have documented biological effects on humans, animals, insects and plants, and alarming effects on health and the environment in thousands of peer-reviewed studies have been excluded. The reason for the current inadequate safety guidelines is that conflicts of interest of standard-setting bodies “due to their relationships with telecommunications or electric companies undermine the impartiality that should govern the regulation of Public Exposure Standards for non-ionizing radiation”. [92] Professor Emeritus Martin L. Pall lays out the conflicts of interest in detail, and the lists of important studies that have been excluded, in his literature review. [93]

The thermal hypothesis is obsolete—new safety standards are needed

Current safety guidelines are based on the obsolete hypothesis that heating is the only harmful effect of EMFs. As Markov and Grigoriev have stated, “Today standards do not consider the real pollution of the environment with nonionizing radiation”.[94] Hundreds of scientists, including many signatories to this appeal, have proven that many different kinds of acute and chronic illnesses and injuries are caused without heating (“non-thermal effect”) from radiation levels far below international guidelines.9 Biological effects occur even at near-zero power levels. Effects that have been found at 0.02 picowatts (trillionths of a watt) per square centimetre or less include altered genetic structure in E. coli[95] and in rats,[96] altered EEG in humans,[97] growth stimulation in bean plants,[98] and stimulation of ovulation in chickens.[99]

To protect against non-thermal effects, duration of exposure must be considered. 5G will expose everyone to many more transmissions simultaneously and continuously, day and night without cessation. New safety standards are needed and should be based on cumulative exposure and not only on power levels but also on frequency, bandwidth, modulation, waveform, pulse width and other properties that are biologically important. Antennas must be confined to specific, publicly identified locations. To protect humans, antennas must be located far from where people live and work, and excluded from the public rights-of-way where people walk. To protect wildlife, they must be excluded from wilderness sanctuaries and strictly minimized in remote areas of the Earth. To protect all life, commercial communications satellites must be limited in number and prohibited in low- and medium-Earth orbits. Phased arrays must be prohibited on Earth and in space.

RF radiation has both acute and chronic effects

RF radiation has both immediate and long-term effects. Cancer and heart disease are examples of long-term effects. Alteration of heart rhythm[100] and changes in brain function (EEG)[101] are examples of immediate effects. A syndrome that was called radiowave sickness[102] in the former Soviet Union and is called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) around the world today[103] can be either acute or chronic. Professor Dr. Karl Hecht has published a detailed history of these syndromes, compiled from a review of more than 1,500 Russian scientific papers and the clinical histories of more than 1,000 of his own patients in Germany. Objective findings include sleep disorders, abnormal blood pressure and heart rate, digestive disorders, hair loss, tinnitus and skin rash. Subjective symptoms include dizziness, nausea, headache, memory loss, inability to concentrate, fatigue, flu-like symptoms and cardiac pain. [104]

The EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 states that EHS develops when people are “continuously exposed in their daily life” to increasing levels of EMFs, and that “reduction and prevention of EMF exposure” is necessary to restore these patients to health.[105] EHS should no longer be considered a disease, but an injury by a toxic environment that affects an increasingly large portion of the population, estimated already at 100 million people worldwide,[106][107] and that may soon affect everyone[108] if the worldwide rollout of 5G is permitted.

The International Scientific Declaration on EHS and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), Brussels, declared in 2015 that “[i]naction is a cost to society and is not an option any more… [W]e unanimously acknowledge this serious hazard to public health… [urgently requiring] that major primary prevention measures are adopted and prioritized, to face this worldwide pan-epidemic in perspective” (emphasis added).[109]

World governments are failing in their duty of care to the populations they govern

In their haste to implement 5G and to encourage the unconstrained use of outer space, the European Union, United States and national governments worldwide are taking steps to ensure a “barrier-free” regulatory environment.[110] They are prohibiting local authorities from enforcing environmental laws,[111] and “in the interest of speedy and cost-effective deployment”, removing “unnecessary burdens… such as local planning procedures [and] the variety of specific limits on electromagnetic field (EMF) emissions and of the methods required to aggregate them”.[112]

Governments are also enacting laws to make wireless facilities a permitted use in all public rights-of-way.[113] To date, most wireless facilities have been located on private property at some distance from homes and businesses. In order for them to be spaced less than 100 metres apart as required by 5G, however, they will now be located on the sidewalk directly in front of homes and businesses and close above the heads of pedestrians, including mothers with babies.

Public notice requirements and public hearings are being eliminated. Even if there were a hearing and 100 scientific experts were to testify against 5G, laws have been passed making it illegal for local authorities to take their testimony into consideration. US law, for example, prohibits local governments from regulating wireless technology “on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency radiation”,[114] and courts have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health.[115] Insurers will not provide coverage against EMF risks,[116] and there is zero clarity as to what entity will bear legal responsibility for damage to life, limb and property arising from exposure to 5G, whether ground- or space-based.[117]

In the absence of an agreed comprehensive legal regime governing activities in outer space, legal liability for those activities is non-existent, despite the prospect of whole continents, the atmosphere and the oceans being put at risk by them.

 International agreements are being violated

Children and duty of care

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: States shall “undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being” (art. 3), “ensure… the survival and development of the child” (art. 6) and “take appropriate measures to combat disease… taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution” (art. 24(c)).

The Nuremberg Code (1947) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the deployment of 5G with new, higher RF radiation exposure that has not been pre-market tested for safety. “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” (art. 1). Exposure to 5G will be involuntary. “No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur” (art. 5). The findings of over 10,000 scientific studies and the voices of hundreds of international organizations representing hundreds of thousands of members who have suffered disabling injury and been displaced from their homes by already-existing wireless telecommunications facilities, are “a priori reasons to believe that death or disabling injury will occur”.

Duty to inform and EMFs

The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (2012) of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) stated that “[t]here is a need to inform the public of the potential effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs)” and invited Member States “to adopt suitable measures in order to ensure compliance with relevant international recommendations to protect health against the adverse effect of EMF”.

The Mid-term review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010 (2008): “The European Parliament… [n]otes that the limits on exposure to electromagnetic fields which have been set for the general public are obsolete, … obviously take no account of developments in information and communication technologies, of the recommendations issued by the European Environment Agency or of the stricter emission standards adopted, for example, by Belgium, Italy and Austria, and do not address the issue of vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women, newborn babies and children.”

Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011): “Take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones, and particularly the exposure to children and young people.”

Environment

The Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972): “The discharge of toxic substances… in such quantities or concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render them harmless, must be halted in order to ensure that serious or irreversible damage is not inflicted upon ecosystems” (principle 6).

The World Charter for Nature (1982): “Activities which are likely to cause irreversible damage to nature shall be avoided… [W]here potential adverse effects are not fully understood, the activities should not proceed” (art. 11).

The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992): “States have… the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction” (principle 2).

The United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002): “There is an urgent need to… create more effective national and regional policy responses to environmental threats to human health” (para. 54(k)).

The African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2017): “The Parties shall… take all appropriate measures to prevent, mitigate and eliminate to the maximum extent possible, detrimental effects on the environment, in particular from radioactive, toxic, and other hazardous substances and wastes” (art. 13).

Health and human rights

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (art. 3).

The United Nations Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health(2016-2030) has as objectives and targets to “transform”, by expanding enabling environments; to “survive”, by reducing maternal and newborn mortality; and to “thrive” by ensuring health and well-being and reducing pollution-related deaths and illnesses.

Space

The Outer Space Treaty (1967) requires that the use of outer space be conducted “so as to avoid [its] harmful contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth”(art. IX)

The United Nations Guidelines for The Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (2018): “States and international intergovernmental organizations should address… risks to people, property, public health and the environment associated with the launch, in-orbit operation and re-entry of space objects” (guideline 2.2(c)).

World governments are playing dice with life on Earth

Albert Einstein famously asserted that “God does not play dice”.[118] Yet by pursuing the broadcast on Earth and from space of 5G, an unprecedented technology of millimetre waves previously used as an energy weapon in military operations and crowd control,[119] world governments are recklessly playing dice with the future of life on Earth.

To refuse to accept and apply relevant and valid scientific knowledge is ethically unacceptable. Existing research shows that 5G—and especially space-based 5G—contravenes principles enshrined in a host of international agreements.

We call upon the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations,

(a) To take immediate measures to halt the deployment of 5G on Earth and in space in order to protect all humankind, especially the unborn, infants, children, adolescents and pregnant women, as well as the environment;

(b) To follow the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and Council of Europe Resolution 1815 by informing citizens, including teachers and physicians, about the health risks (to adults and children) from RF radiation, and why they should and how they can avoid wireless communication and base stations, particularly in or near day-care centres, schools, hospitals, homes and workplaces;

(c) To favour and implement wired telecommunications instead of wireless;

(d) To prohibit the wireless/telecommunications industry through its lobbying organizations from persuading officials to make decisions permitting further expansion of RF radiation, including ground- and space-based 5G;

(e) To appoint immediately—without industry influence—international groups of independent, truly impartial EMF and health scientists with no conflicts of interest, [120] for the purpose of establishing new international safety standards for RF radiation that are not based only on power levels, that consider cumulative exposure, and that protect against all health and environmental effects, not just thermal effects and not just effects on humans;

(f) To appoint immediately—without industry influence—international groups of scientists with expertise in EMFs, health, biology and atmospheric physics, for the purpose of developing a comprehensive regulatory framework that will ensure that the uses of outer space are safe for humans and the environment, taking into account RF radiation, rocket exhaust gases, black soot, and space debris and their impacts on ozone, [121] global warming, [122] the atmosphere and the preservation of life on Earth. Not only ground-based but also space-based technology must be sustainable [123] for adults and children, animals and plants.

Please respond to the Appeal Administrator listed below,

detailing the measures you intend to take to protect the global population against RF radiation exposure, especially 5G radiation. This appeal and your response will be publicly available on www.5gSpaceAppeal.org.

Respectfully submitted,

Arthur Firstenberg, Appeal Administrator, info@5gSpaceAppeal.org

Initial signatories

AFRICA

Lauraine Margaret Helen Vivian, PhD, Anthropology and Psychiatry; Honorary Research Associate, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Signatory for South Africa

ASIA

Girish Kumar, PhD, Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India

AUSTRALIA

Don Maisch, PhD, Independent researcher, author of ”The Procrustean Approach”, Lindisfarne, Tasmania, Australia

EUROPE

Alfonso Balmori, BSc, Master in Environmental Education, Biologist. Valladolid, Spain

Klaus Buchner, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, MEP – Member of the European Parliament, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., München, Germany

Daniel Favre, Dr. phil. nat., Biologist, A.R.A. (Association Romande Alerte aux Ondes Electromagnétiques), Switzerland

Annie Sasco, MD, DrPH, SM, HDR, former Chief of Research Unit of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon; former Acting Chief, Programme for Cancer Control of the World Health Organization (WHO); former Director of Research at the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); France

NORTH AMERICA

Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, residing in Portland, Oregon, USA

Kate Showers, PhD, Soil Science, Senior Research Fellow, Centre for World Environmental History, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK, residing in Bolton-Est, Québec, Canada

SOUTH AMERICA

Carlos Sosa, MD, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia



References

[1] De Grasse M. AT&T outlines 5G network architecture. RCR Wireless News, Oct. 20, 2016. https://www.rcrwireless.com/20161020/network-infrastructure/att-outlines-5g-network-architecture-tag4. Accessed July 9, 2018.

[2] Hong W, Jiang ZH, Yu C, et al. Multibeam antenna technologies for 5G wireless communications. IEEE Tr Ant Prop. 2017;65(12):6231-6249. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2712819.

[3] Chou H-T. Design Methodology for the Multi-Beam Phased Array of Antennas with Relatively Arbitrary Coverage Sector. Conference paper: 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation; Paris, France. doi: 10.23919/EuCAP.2017.7928095.

[4] 47 CFR § 30.202 — Power limits.

[6] Federal Communications Commission. Pending Application for Satellite Space and Earth Station Authorization. Schedule S, Technical Report. Dated April 2016, filed March 1, 2017. http://licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/download.do?attachment_key=1200245. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[7] Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology. Cellular Phone Task Force website. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/governments-and-organizations-that-ban-or-warn-against-wireless-technology/. Accessed June 10, 2018. Continually updated.

[8] The International Doctors ́ Appeal (Freiburger Appeal). http://freiburger-appell-2012.info/en/home.php?lang=EN. Published in 2012. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[9] International appeal: scientists call for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure. International EMF Scientist Appeal website. https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal. Published May 11, 2015. Accessed June 10, 2018. As of March 2018, 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations had signed the Appeal.

[10] Glaser Z. Cumulated index to the bibliography of reported biological phenofmena (‘effects’) and clinical manifestations attributed to microwave and radio-frequency radiation: report, supplements (no. 1-9).BEMS newsletter (B-1 through B-464), 1971-1981. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Zory-Glasers-index.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2018. Report and 9 supplements issued by Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, MD; Research Division, Bureau of Medicine & Surgery, Dept. of the Navy, Washington, DC; Electromagnetic Radiation Project Office, Naval Medical Research & Development Command, Bethesda, MD; Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren, VA; and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Rockville, MD. Index by Julie Moore and Associates, Riverside, CA, 1984. Lt. Zorach Glaser, PhD, catalogued 5,083 studies, books and conference reports for the US Navy through 1981.

[11] Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. Sage Associates; 2012. www.bioinitiative.org. Accessed June 10, 2018. The 1,470-page BioInitiative Report, authored by an international group of 29 experts, has reviewed more than 1,800 new studies and is continually updated.

[12] Grigoriev Y. Bioeffects of modulated electromagnetic fields in the acute experiments (results of Russian researches). Annu Russ Natl Comm Non-Ionising Radiat Protect. 2004:16-73. http://bemri.org/publications/biological-effects-of-non-ionizing-radiation/78-grigoriev-bioeffects07/file.html. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[13] Obajuluwa AO, Akinyemi AJ, Afolabi OB, et al. Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic waves alters acetylcholinesterase gene expression, exploratory and motor coordination-linked behaviour in male rats.Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:530-534. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475001730063X/pdfft?md5=0af5af76124b1f89f6d23c90c5c7764f&pid=1-s2.0-S221475001730063X-main.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[14] Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang G-J, et al. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. JAMA. 2012;305(8):808-813. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[15] Eghlidospour M, Ghanbari A, Mortazavi S, Azari H. Effects of radiofrequency exposure emitted from a GSM mobile phone on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of neural stem cells. Anat Cell Biol. 2017;50(2):115-123. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5509895. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[16] Hardell L, Carlberg C. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumors. Int J Oncol.2009;35(1):5-17. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/35/1/5/download. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[17] Bandara P, Weller S. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(17):1819-1823. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2047487317734898. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[18] Deshmukh P et al. Cognitive impairment and neurogenotoxic effects in rats exposed to low-intensity microwave radiation. Int J Toxicol. 2015;34(3):284-290. doi: 10.1177/1091581815574348.

[19] Zothansiama, Zosangzuali M, Lalramdinpuii M, Jagetia GC. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromag Biol Med. 2017;36(3):295-305. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2017.1350584.

[20] Zwamborn A, Vossen S, van Leersum B, Ouwens M, Mäkel W. Effects of Global Communication system radio-frequency fields on Well Being and Cognitive Functions of human subjects with and without subjective complaints. TNO Report FEL-03-C148. The Hague: TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory; 2003. http://www.milieugezondheid.be/dossiers/gsm/TNO_rapport_Nederland_sept_2003.pdf.
Accessed June 16, 2018.

[21] Havas M. When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer? Environ Pollut. 2017;221:501-505. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.018.

[22] Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Mailankot M. Spatial memory performance of Wistar rats exposed to mobile phone. Clinics. 2009;64(3):231-234. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2666459. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[23] Houston BJ, Nixon B, King BV, De Iuliis GN, Aitken RJ. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. Reproduction. 2016;152(6):R263-R266. http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/152/6/R263.long. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[24] Han J, Cao Z, Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang S. Effect of early pregnancy electromagnetic field exposure on embryo growth ceasing. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2010;39(3):349-52 (in Chinese). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20568468.

[25] Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BRR. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(7):881-883. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241519/pdf/ehp0111-000881.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[26] Milham S. Evidence that dirty electricity is causing the worldwide epidemics of obesity and diabetes. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(1):75-78. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.783853.

[27] Yakymenko I, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Henshel D, Kyrylenko O, Kyrylenko S. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):186-202. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557.

[28] Herbert M, Sage C. Findings in autism (ASD) consistent with electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency radiation (RFR). In: Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. Sec. 20. Sage Associates; 2012. http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec20_2012_Findings_in_Autism.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[29] Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 2008;19: 523–529. http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/divan_08_prenatal_postnatal
_cell_phone_use.pdf
. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[30] Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;66(6):524-529. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.115402. Accessed July 16, 2018.

[31] Li D-K, Chen H, Odouli R. Maternal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy in relation to the risk of asthma in offspring. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(10):945-950. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1107612. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[32] Warnke U. Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by ‘Electrosmog.’ Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy; 2009. www.naturalscience.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/01/kompetenzinitiative-ev_study_bees-birds-and-mankind_04-08_english.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[33] Balmori A. Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology. 2009;16:191-199. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.007. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[34] Cammaerts MC, Johansson O. Ants can be used as bio-indicators to reveal biological effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(4):282-288. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.817336.

[35] Broomhall M. Report detailing the exodus of species from the Mt. Nardi area of the Nightcap National Park World Heritage Area during a 15-year period (2000-2015). Report for the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Mt-Nardi-Wildlife-Report-to-UNESCO-FINAL.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[36] Kordas D. Birds and Trees of Northern Greece: Changes since the Advent of 4G Wireless. 2017. https://einarflydal.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/kordas-birds-and-trees-of-northern-greece-2017-final.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[37] Waldmann-Selsam C, Balmori-de la Puente A, Breunig H, Balmori A. Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations. Sci Total Environ. 2016;572:554-569. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.045.

[38] Balmori A. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: The city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn Biol Med. 2010(1-2):31-35. doi: 10.3109/15368371003685363.

[39] Margaritis LH, Manta AK, Kokkaliaris KD, et al. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(3):165-189. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.800102.

[40] Kumar NR, Sangwan S, Badotra P. Exposure to cell phone radiations produces biochemical changes in worker honey bees. Toxicol Int. 2011;18(1):70-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052591. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[41] Balmori A. Efectos de las radiaciones electromagnéticas de la telefonía móvil sobre los insectos.Ecosistemas. 2006;15(1):87-95. https://www.revistaecosistemas.net/index.php/ecosistemas/article/ download/520/495. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[42] Balmori A. The incidence of electromagnetic pollution on wild mammals: A new “poison” with a sloweffect on nature? Environmentalist. 2010;30(1):90-97. doi: 10.1007/s10669-009-9248-y

[43] Magras IN, Xenos TD. RF radiation-induced changes in the prenatal development of mice.Bioelectromagnetics 1997;18(6):455-461. http://collectiveactionquebec.com/uploads/8/0/9/7/80976394/exhibit_r-62_magras_mice_study.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[44] Otitoloju AA, Osunkalu VO, Oduware R, et al. Haematological effects of radiofrequency radiation from GSM base stations on four successive generations (F1 – F4) of albino mice, Mus Musculus. J Environ Occup Sci. 2012;1(1):17-22. https://www.ejmanager.com/mnstemps/62/62-1332160631.pdf?t=1532966199. Accessed July 30, 2018.

[45] Magone I. The effect of electromagnetic radiation from the Skrunda Radio Location Station on Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleiden cultures. Sci Total Environ. 1996;180(1):75-80. doi: 0048-9697(95)04922-3.

[46] Nittby H, Brun A, Strömblad S, et al. Nonthermal GSM RF and ELF EMF effects upon rat BBB permeability.Environmentalist. 2011;31(2):140-148. doi: 10.1007/s10669-011-9307-z.

[47] Haggerty K. Adverse influence of radio frequency background on trembling aspen seedlings: Preliminary observations. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2010; Article ID 836278. http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijfr/2010/836278.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[48] Taheri M, Mortazavi SM, Moradi M, et al. Evaluation of the effect of radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi router and mobile phone simulator on the antibacterial susceptibility of pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. Dose Response. 2017;15(1):1559325816688527. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298474. Accessed June 18, 2018.

[49] International Agency for Research on Cancer. Non-ionizing radiation, part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol 102. Lyon, France: WHO Press; 2013.  http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol102/mono102.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2018.

[50] Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints from 1965 on association and causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017:9218486. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376454. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[51] Blackman CF. Evidence for disruption by the modulating signal. In: Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. Sec. 15. Sage Associates; 2012. http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec15_2007_Modulation_Blackman.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2018.

[52] Williams ER. The global electrical circuit: a review. Atmos Res. 2009;91(2):140-152. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.05.018.

[53] Wever R. Human circadian rhythms under the influence of weak electric fields and the different aspects of these studies. Int J Biometeorol. 1973;17(3):227-232. www.vitatec.com/docs/referenz-umgebungsstrahlung/wever-1973.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[54] Wever R. ELF-effects on human circadian rhythms. In: ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects. (Persinger M, ed.) New York: Plenum; 1974:101-144.

[55] Engels S, Schneider N-L, Lefeldt N, et al. Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird. Nature. 2014;509:353-356. doi:10.1038/nature13290.

[56] Ludwig W, Mecke R. Wirkung künstlicher Atmospherics auf Säuger. Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie Serie B (Archives for Meteorology Geophysics and Bioclimatology Series B Theoretical and Applied Climatology). 1968;16(2-3):251-261. doi:10.1007/BF02243273.

[57] Morley EL, Robert D. Electric fields elicit ballooning in spiders. Current Biology. 2018;28:1-7. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(18)30693-6.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2018.

[58] Weber J. Die Spinnen sind Deuter des kommenden Wetters (Spiders Are Predictors of the Coming Weather). 1800; Landshut, Germany. “The electrical material works always in the atmosphere; no seasoncan retard its action. Its effects on the weather are almost undisputed; spiders sense it, and alter theirbehaviour accordingly.”

[59] König H. Biological effects of extremely low frequency electrical phenomena in the atmosphere. J Interdiscipl Cycle Res. 2(3):317-323. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09291017109359276. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[60] Sulman F. The Effect of Air Ionization, Electric Fields, Atmospherics, and Other Electric Phenomena On Man and Animal. American lecture series. Vol 1029. Springfield, Ill: Thomas; 1980.

[61] König HL, Krüger, AP, Lang S, Sönning, W. Biologic Effects of Environmental Electromagnetism. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5859-9.

[62] Sazanova E, Sazanov A, Sergeenko N, Ionova V, Varakin Y. Influence of near earth electromagnetic resonances on human cerebrovascular system in time of heliogeophysical disturbances. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium. August 2013:1661-1665.

[63] Cherry N. Schumann resonances, a plausible biophysical mechanism for the human health effects of solar/geomagnetic activity. Natural Hazards. 2002;26(3):279-331. doi:10.1023/A:1015637127504.

[64] Polk C. Schumann resonances. In Volland H, ed. CRC Handbook of Atmospherics. Vol. 1. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1982:111-178. https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.132044/2015.132044.Crc-Handbook-Of-Atmospherics-Vol-1#page/n115/mode/2up/search/polk. Accessed June 18, 2018.

[65] Park C, Helliwell R. Magnetospheric effects of power line radiation. Science. 1978;200(4343):727-730. doi:10.1126/science.200.4343.727.

[66] Bullough K, Kaiser TR, Strangeways HJ. Unintentional man-made modification effects in the magnetosphere. J Atm Terr Phys. 1985;47(12):1211-1223.

[67] Luette JP, Park CG, Helliwell RA. The control of the magnetosphere by power line radiation. J Geophys Res. 1979;84:2657-2660.

[68] Becker RO, Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. New York: Morrow; 1985:325-326.

[69] Firstenberg A. Planetary Emergency. Cellular Phone Task Force website. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/planetary-emergency. Published 2018. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[70] Becker RO. The basic biological data transmission and control system influenced by electrical forces. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1974;238:236-241. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb26793.x.

[71] Maxey ES, Beal JB. The electrophysiology of acupuncture; How terrestrial electric and magnetic fields influence air ion energy exchanges through acupuncture points. International Journal of Biometeorology. 1975;19(Supp. 1):124. doi:10.1007/BF01737335.

[72] Ćosić I, Cvetković D, Fang Q, Jovanov E, Lazoura H. Human electrophysiological signal responses to ELFSchumann resonance and artificial electromagnetic fields. FME Transactions. 2006;34:93-103. http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1450-8230/2006/1450-82300602093C.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2018.

[73] Cohen M, Behrenbruch C, Ćosić I. Is there a link between acupuncture meridians, earth-ionosphere resonances and cerebral activity? Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism, Melbourne, Australia. 1998:173-174. doi: 10.1109/ICBEM.1998.666451.

[74] Chevalier G, Mori K, Oschman JL. The effect of earthing (grounding) on human physiology. European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics. January 2006:600-621. http://162.214.7.219/~earthio0/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Effects-of-Earthing-on-Human-Physiology-Part-1.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018. “Highly significant EEG, EMG and BVP results demonstrate that restoring the natural electrical potential of the earth to the human body (earthing) rapidly affects human electrophysiological and physiological parameters. The extreme rapidity of these changes indicates a physical/bioelectrical mechanism ratherthan a biochemical change.”

[75] Firstenberg A. Earth’s Electric Envelope. In: The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life. Santa Fe, NM: AGB Press; 2017: 113-131.

[76] Cannon PS, Rycroft MJ. Schumann resonance frequency variations during sudden ionospheric disturbances. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys. 1982;44(2):201-206. doi:10.1016/0021-9169(82)90124-6.

[77] Technical Report. European Telecommunications Standards Institute; 2007:7. http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/125900_125999/125914/07.00.00_60/
tr_125914v070000p.pdf
. Accessed June 10, 2018. “The Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) is used for radiated performancemeasurements [and is] filled with tissue simulating liquid.”

[78] Research on technology to evaluate compliance with RF protection guidelines. Electromagnetic Compatibility Laboratory, Tokyo. http://emc.nict.go.jp/bio/phantom/index_e.html. Accessed July 18, 2018.“SAR is measured by filling phantom liquid that has the same electrical properties as those of the human body in a container made in the shape of the human body, and scanning the inside using an SAR probe.”

[79] Becker RO, Marino AA. Electromagnetism and Life. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1982:39.“The evidence seems to be quite conclusive that there are steady DC electric currents flowing outside of the neurones proper in the entire nervous system.”

[80] Nordenström B. Biologically Closed Electric Circuits. Stockholm: Nordic Medical Publications; 1983.

[81] Nordenström B. Impact of biologically closed electric circuits (BCEC) on structure and function. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1992;27(4):285-303. doi:10.1007/BF02691165.

[82] Devyatkov ND, ed. Non-Thermal Effects of Millimeter Radiation. Moscow: USSR Acad. Sci.; 1981 (Russian).

[83] Devyatkov ND, Golant MB, Betskiy OV. Millimeter Waves and Their Role in the Processes of Life. (Millimetrovye volny i ikh rol’ v protsessakh zhiznedeyatel’nosti). Moscow: Radio i svyaz’ (Radio and Communication); 1991 (Russian).

[84] Betskii OV. Biological effects of low-intensity millimetre waves (Review). Journal of Biomedical Electronics. 2015(1):31-47. http://www.radiotec.ru/article/15678. Accessed July 31, 2018.

[85] Albanese R, Blaschak J, Medina R, Penn J. Ultrashort electromagnetic signals: Biophysical questions,safety issues and medical opportunities,” Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994;65(5 Supp):A116-A120. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a282990.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.

[86] Pepe D, Aluigi L, Zito D. Sub-100 ps monocycle pulses for 5G UWB communications. 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). 2016;1-4. doi: 10.1109/EuCAP.2016.7481123.

[87] Nasim I, Kim S. Human exposure to RF fields in 5G downlink. arXiv:1711.03683v1.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.03683. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[88] Thielens A, Bell D, Mortimore DB. Exposure of insects to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields from 2 to 120 GHz. Nature/Scientific Reports. 2018;8:3924. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22271-3.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[89] Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E. More than 75 per cent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLOS One. 2017;12(10):e0185809. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185809&type=printable. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[90] Gandhi O, Riazi A. Absorption of millimeter waves by human beings and its biological implications. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 1986;34(2):228-235. doi:10.1109/TMTT.1986.1133316.

[91] Russell CL. 5G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications. Environ Res 2018;165:484-495. https://zero5g.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/5-G-wireless-telecommunications-expansion-Public-health-and-environmental-implications-Cindy-L.-russell.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2018.

[92] Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health—a hard nut to crack (review). Int J Oncol. 2017;51:405-413. doi:10.3892/ijo.2017.4046.

[93] Pall M. 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and international health: Compelling evidence for eight distinct types of great harm caused by electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures and the mechanism that causes them. European Academy for Environmental Medicine. http://www.5gappeal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pall_2018.pdf. Published May 2018. Accessed June 22, 2018.

[94] Markov M, Grigoriev Y. Wi-Fi technology: An uncontrolled global experiment on the health of mankind,Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(2):200-208. http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/Wi-fi_Technology_-_An_Uncontrolled_Global_Experiment_on_the_Health_of_Mankind_-_Marko_Markov_Yuri_G._Grigoriev.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2018.

[95] Belyaev I, Alipov Y, Shcheglov V, Polunin V, Aizenberg O. Cooperative response of Escherichia coli cells to the resonance effect of millimeter waves at super low intensity. Electromagn Biol Med. 1994;13(1):53-66. doi:10.3109/15368379409030698.

[96] Belyaev I. Nonthermal biological effects of microwaves: Current knowledge, further perspective, and urgent needs. Electromagn Biol Med. 2005;24(3):375-403. doi:10.1080/15368370500381844.

[97] Bise W. Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior. Physiol Chem Phys. 1978;10(5):387-398.

[98] Brauer I. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Wirkung von Meterwellen verschiedener Feldstärke auf das Teilungswachstum der Pflanzen. Chromosoma. 1950;3(1):483-509. doi:10.1007/BF00319492.

[99] Kondra P, Smith W, Hodgson G, Bragg D, Gavora J, Hamid M. Growth and reproduction of chickens subjected to microwave radiation. Can J Anim Sci. 1970;50(3):639-644. doi:10.4141/cjas70-087.

[100] Frey AH, Seifert E. Pulse modulated UHF energy illumination of the heart associated with change in heart rate. Life Sciences. 1968;7(10 Part 2):505-512. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(68)90068-4.

[101] Mann K, Röschke J. Effects of pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human sleep.Neuropsychobiology. 1996;33(1):41-47. doi: 10.1159/000119247.

[102] Tiagin NV. Clinical aspects of exposure to microwave radiation. Moscow: Meditsina; 1971 (Russian).

[103] Belpomme D, Campagnac C, Irigaray P. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Rev Environ Health 2015;30(4):251–271.  https://www.jrseco.com/wp-content/uploads/Belpomme-Environmental-health-2015.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.

[104] Hecht K. Health Implications of Long-term Exposure to Electrosmog. Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, the Environment and Democracy. 2016: 16, 42-46. http://kompetenzinitiative.net/KIT/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/KI_Brochure-6_K_Hecht_web.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2018.

[105] Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health. 2016;31(3):363-397. doi:10.1515/reveh-2016-0011.

[106] Schreier N, Huss A, Röösli M. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: A cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Soz Praventivmed. 2006;51(4):202-209. doi:10.1007/s00038-006-5061-2. Accessed July 16, 2018.

[107] Schroeder E. Stakeholder-Perspektiven zur Novellierung der 26. BImSchV: Ergebnisse der bundesweitenTelefonumfrage im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Strahlenschutz (Report on stakeholder perspectives onamending the 26th Federal Emission Control Ordinance: Results of the nationwide telephone survey ordered by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection). Schr/bba 04.02.26536.020. Munich, Germany. 2002 (German).  https://www.bfs.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/BfS/DE/berichte/emf/befuerchtungen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3. Accessed July 19, 2018.

[108] Hallberg Ö, Oberfeld G. Letter to the editor: Will we all become electrosensitive? Electromagn Biol Med.2006;25:189-191. https://www.criirem.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/ehs2006_hallbergoberfeld.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2018.

[109] Brussels International Scientific Declaration on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. ECRI Institute.  http://eceri-institute.org/fichiers/ 1441982765_Statement_EN_DEFINITIF.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[110] Removal of barriers to entry, 47 U.S.C. § 253. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2015-title47/pdf/USCODE-2015-title47-chap5-subchapII-partII-sec253.pdf; 5G For Europe: An Action Plan. European Commission; 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=17131. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[111] Federal Register – Rules and Regulations. 47 CFR Part 1 [WT Docket No 17–79; FCC 18–30] Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment. 2018;83(86). Accessed June 10, 2018.

[112] 5G For Europe: An Action Plan. European Commission; 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=17131. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[113] PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association. Model wireless telecommunications facility siting ordinance. 2012. https://wia.org/wp- content/uploads/Advocacy_Docs/PCIA_Model_Zoning_Ordinance_June_2012.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.

[114] Mobile services, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2016-title47/pdf/USCODE-2016-title47-chap5-subchapIII-partI-sec332.pdf: “No state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” Courts have reversed regulatory decisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health.

[115] Cellular Telephone Company v. Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490, 495 (2nd Cir. 1999). https://openjurist.org/166/f3d/490/cellular-telephone-company-at-v-town-of-oyster-bay. Accessed June 10, 2018.; T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Loudoun County Bd. of Sup’rs, 903 F.Supp.2d 385, 407 (E.D.Va. 2012). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1662394.html. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[116] Vogel G. A Coming Storm For Wireless? TalkMarkets. July 2017. http://talkmarkets.com/content/stocks–equities/a-coming-storm-for-wireless?post=143501&page=2. Accessed September 13, 2018.

[117] Swiss Re: SONAR – New emerging risk insights. July 2014:22. http://media.swissre.com/documents/SONAR_2014.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018. “[A]n increasing level of interconnectivity and the growing prevalence of digital steering and feedback systems also give rise to new vulnerabilities. These could involve cascading effects with multiple damages as well as long-lasting interruptions if the problems turned out to be complex and/or difficult to repair. Interconnectivity and permanent data generation give rise to concerns about data privacy, and exposure to electromagnetic fields may also increase.”

[118] Albert Einstein, letter to Max Born, Dec. 4, 1926.

[119] Active Denial Technology. Non-Lethal Weapons Program. https://jnlwp.defense.gov/Press-Room/Fact-Sheets/Article-View-Fact-sheets/Article/577989/active-denial-technology/. Published May 11, 2016. Accessed June 10, 2018.

[120] Conflicts of interest have frequently arisen in the past. For example, the EU Commission (2008/721/EC) appointed industry-supportive members for SCENIHR who submitted to the EU a misleading SCENIHR report on health risks, which gave the telecommunications industry carte blanche to irradiate EU citizens. The report is now quoted by radiation safety agencies in the EU. Another example is the US National Toxicology Program contracting with the IT’IS Foundation, which is funded by the entire telecommunications industry, to design, build and monitor the exposure facility for a two-year, 25-million-US-dollar study of cell phones. It subsequently produced a misleading report that is now quoted by industry officials in the US.

[121] Ross M, Mills M, Toohey D. Potential climate impact of black carbon emitted by rockets. Geophys Res Lett. 2010;37:L24810.  https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2010GL044548. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[122] Ross MN, Schaeffer PM. Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions. Earth’s Future. 2014;2:177-196.  https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2013EF000160. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[123] Callicott JB, Mumford K. Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept. Conservation Biology. 1997;11(1):32-40. https://www.sierraforestlegacy.org/Resources/Community/Sustainability/
SY_CallicottMumford1997.pdf
. Accessed June 20, 2018.

    

    

  

The Unspoken Truth: EMF’s Threaten 1 MILLION Species with Extinction

By Lisa Henkes, with the research, expertise and wisdom of Claire Edwards and Arthur Firstenberg

“Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming.” 

But in a recent BBC article, they basically did just that: completely ignored the ridiculously large volume of evidence, which any ‘respectable’ news outlet should know exists and which if reviewed, reveals the major cause of the rapid decline of biodiversity, and the potential soon-to-come total destruction of all life on Earth:

“The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.

“If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.”

“Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is abundant evidence of harm to diverse plant- and wildlife and laboratory animals, including: Ants,  Birds,  Forests, FrogsFruit fliesHoney beesInsects,  Mammals,  MicePlantsRatsTrees.

“Negative microbiological effects have also been recorded… Effects in children include autism,  attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and asthma.“. – The International Appeal ‘Stop 5G on Earth and in Space’

 

“Microwave weapons expert, Barrie Trower, warns that within 3 generations only 1 in 8 children will be born healthy; and within 5 generations animals and insects will be wiped out.” – Julian Rose, “Synthetic Electric Shock”

 

Former UN staff editor, and co-author of The International Appeal ‘Stop 5G on Earth and in Space’, Claire Edwards, writes: “Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.”

 

And in a recent Anti-5G rally speech in Stockholm, Edwards stated: “It’s interesting to note that in the last 20 years we have lost 80% of our insects. And if we get 5G, we’re going to lose 100% of our insects.  When the insects go, we go too.” 

 

Our beloved house pets have also been forced to absorb our electro pollutions. B.N. Frank, writes how “… exposure can cause various health problems in animals – including cancer.  If your pets become sick, many vets will not take exposure to any of these sources into consideration when diagnosing and treating them.  Even if you address your concerns about exposure, they may still discount research that has already proven harm.” 

 

Hope S. Good details 22 common illnesses from which electro-smog and RF are harming our fur-babies.

 

The known effects continue to be evidenced, as seen in field tests this past year in The Netherlands, where dairy farmers in Stitswerd-Groningen witnessed the extreme effects 5G is creating in livestock:

“… Several hundreds of cows from the 5 dairy farmers simultaneously started running riot without a clear cause… their behavior really looked like agony, so it was not just a moment of frustration for the cows, it was really a life or death situation… the most logical conclusion is that the panic attacks are caused by the recent testing of 5G Wi-Fi in the North of Groningen, exactly where Stitswerd is located!”

“The phenomenon has occurred since last fall. “Suddenly you see that they jump and start running at the same time,” says dairy farmer Jan Oudman. “As they do, the walls of the stable are almost out. They sweat from the unrest. It’s really anxiety.”  – RTVNoord, “Wat mankeert de koeien?”

 

“… at The Hague, many birds died spontaneously, falling dead in a park. You likely haven’t heard a lot about this because it is being kept quiet. However, when about 150 more suddenly died – bringing the death toll to 297 – people started to notice.

“And if you are looking around that park you see what stands on the corner of the roof across the street from where they died: a new 5G mast, where they had done a test, in connection with the Dutch railway station, to see how large the range was and what environmental impact would occur on and around the station.

“If they all got heart-failure despite having healthy bodies, no signs of any virus, no bacterial infection, healthy blood, no poisons found etc. etc, then the only reasonable explanation is that it is from the new 5G Microwaves interfering with all the birds hearts! … The 5G mast heavily resonates with certain ERRATIC PULSED Microwaves (millions per second!) which can be proven to have biological effects on organs!” –Erin Elizabeth, “Unexplained Mass Bird Deaths During Dutch 5G Experiment”

 

Scientific Reports

 

“Published peer reviewed science already indicates that the current wireless technologies of 2G, 3G and 4G – in use today with our cell phones, computers and wearable tech – creates (create) radiofrequency exposures which poses (pose) a serious health risk to humans, animals and the environment. – Scientific Research on 5G, 4G Small Cells, Wireless Radiation and Health  

 

“Future wavelengths of the electromagnetic fields used for the wireless telecommunication systems will decrease and become comparable to the body size of insects and therefore, the absorption of RF-EMFs in insects is expected to increase.”Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz

 

“The authors of the EKLIPSE review conclude that there is “an urgent need to strengthen the scientific basis of the knowledge on EMR and their potential impacts on wildlife. In particular, there is a need to base future research on sound, high-quality, replicable experiments so that credible, transparent and easily accessible evidence can inform society and policy-makers to make decisions and frame their policies.” 

The increase of electromagnetic radiation and its potential effects on wildlife has recently been identified by an international expert group led by Professor Bill Sutherland of Cambridge University as one of the fifteen emerging issues that could affect global biodiversity, but that are not yet well recognised by the scientific community. – (Sutherland, 2018).

“ ‘We apply limits to all types of pollution to protect the habitability of our environment, but as yet, even in Europe, the safe limits of electromagnetic radiation have not been determined, let alone applied.  This is a classic case of out of sight out of mind, just because humans cannot see electromagnetic radiation this does not mean that animals cannot ‘see’ the pollution or be significantly impacted at a neural or cellular level.  A proper research programme and clear policy measures are long overdue”. Said Buglife CEO Matt Shardlow.” –Buglife

 

Alsfonso Balmori asserts, “Studies have shown effects in both animals and plants. Two thirds of the studies reported ecological effects. There is little research in this area and further research is needed. The technology must be safe. Controls should be introduced to mitigate the possible effects… Despite the widespread use of wireless telephone networks around the world, authorities and researchers have paid little attention to the potential harmful effects of mobile phone radiation on wildlife. This paper briefly reviews the available scientific information on this topic and recommends further studies and specific lines of research to confirm or refute the experimental results to date. Controls must be introduced and technology rendered safe for the environment, particularly, threatened species.”  –Electrosmog and species conservation

 

 “…Ferdinand Ruzicka, scientist and beekeeper himself, reports: “I observed a pronounced restlessness in my bee colonies (initially about 40) and a greatly increased urge to swarm. As a frame-hive beekeeper, I use a so-called high floor, the bees did not build their combs in this space in the manner prescribed by the frames, but in random fashion. In the summer, bee colonies collapsed without obvious cause. In the winter, I observed that the bees went foraging despite snow and temperatures below zero and died of cold next to the hive. Colonies that exhibited this behaviour collapsed, even though they were strong, healthy colonies with active queens before winter. They were provided with adequate additional food and the available pollen was more than adequate in autumn. The problems only materialised from the time that several transmitters were erected in the immediate vicinity of my beehives” (RUZICKA, 2003).”  –“BEES, BIRDS AND MANKIND”, Ulrich Dr. Warnke

[further published (peer-reviewed) studies on Bee Colony Collapse (BCC)]:

Margaritis LH, Manta AK, Kokkaliaris KD, et al. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(3):165-189. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.800102. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915130

Kumar NR, Sangwan S, Badotra P. Exposure to cell phone radiations produces biochemical changes in worker honey bees. Toxicol Int. 2011;18(1):70-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052591/.

 

“Plummeting insect numbers ‘threaten collapse of nature’: Insects could vanish within a century at current rate of decline, says global review.”

“Warning of ”ecological Armageddon” after dramatic plunge in insect numbers: Three-quarters of flying insects in nature reserves across Germany have vanished in 25 years, with serious implications for all life on Earth, scientists say.” –Damian Carrington

 

Conclusion

 

Ignoring electromagnetic radiation pollution allows corporate agendas to manifest through NGO’s “suggestions” toward global policy makers. C02 produced “climate change”, originally heralded as “global warming”, is provably caused by intentional climate manipulation.  “All available evidence (including 750 page senate documentspresidential reports, and climate engineering patents) indicate global geoengineering/solar radiation management programs were first deployed at a significant scale in the mid 1940‘s.” –Dane Wigington

 

There are scores of independent scientists who have put their names and careers on the line in appeal petitions, countering the ‘science’ of the IPCC climate model used by the UN and proliferated throughout environmental groups, educational institutions, national governments and NGO agendas.    

 

Dr. Tim Ball displays the contrived sleight of hand which created the C02 premise, and points squarely at the UN’s IPCC as the culprit.   He does it so convincingly that he was sued by three interested parties, and eventually won the 6 year-long defamation lawsuit in just a three week trial.

 

One final and unprovable personal observation I’d like to note: approximately 5 months ago, there suddenly appeared a new thick, solid-metal cell tower not 100 yards from my home, in a wooded suburb of the provincial capital city.  This new monstrosity is itself not 100 yards from an already long-existing taller and more traditionally seen cell tower.  Shortly after noticing the new tower, perhaps another month later, there appeared a new third tower, opposite the taller original, again not 100 yards from it.  So, these three now stand in a row, exceptionally close to residences, schools, sports fields, and a small tree-laden nature area, complete with its own tiny deer herd, jack rabbits, field rabbits, owls, hawks, musk rats, and assorted water fowl.   Except the water fowl are mysteriously missing.  We have ponds and canal banks all through the area, which in prior years were chock-full of ducks and geese and swans.  But they’re not to be found since last summer sometime.  I’ve lived here for 15 years, and am an avid lover of nature and critters, so I search as I walk.  But they’re simply not in any of their normal places.  I’ve seen a few here and there, but there are dozens suddenly missing.

 

The seriousness of these issues are becoming unavoidably visible and real.  We’re all busy with our lives, but it behoves us to look around and take note, and then act.  Do a bit of outside the box research; talk to neighbours and city council member; write emails to commissioners and mayors, asking uncomfortably assertive questions, because if we do nothing, EVERYTHING will change.  

 

 

Onderwerp: 5G en testen in Leeuwarden

PAL GROENLINKS

5G en testen in Leeuwarden

Schriftelijke vragen aan het College van Burgemeester en Wethouders zoals bedoeld in artikel 41, eerste lid, van het Reglement van Orde voor de vergadering van de Raad der Gemeente Leeuwarden

Onderwerp: 5G en testen in Leeuwarden

Datum: 17 september 2019

 Geacht college,

 Het is u wellicht niet ontgaan dat de maatschappelijk onrust t.a.v. het toekomstige 5G netwerk toeneemt. Ook de fractie van PAL GroenLinks krijgt steeds meer signalen van bezorgde burgers, met name m.b.t. de volksgezondheid.

In Maastricht is gebleken dat het ministerie van EZ toestemming heeft gegeven aan Vodafone/Kpn, proeven te doen met 5G, de gemeente en de bevolking daarbij in onkunde latend. Mede hierdoor is de maatschappelijke onrust toegenomen.

Tevens heeft het ministerie van EZ op 16 juli 2019 het concept wetsvoorstel implementatie Telecomcode in de Telecomwet 1998 ter visie gelegd. Het belangrijkste doel hiervan is, het verbeteren van de randvoorwaarden voor het realiseren van snelle digitale communicatieverbindingen in de EU. De kern van het wetsvoorstel is dat overheidsinstanties verplicht worden ‘ín te stemmen met redelijke verzoeken’ van aanbieders van openbare telcommunicatienetwerken en -diensten. Dat betekent dat gemeenten in feite weinig in te brengen hebben en moeten gedogen dat openbare gebouwen en andere publieke infrastructuur, gebruikt kunnen worden voor het aanbrengen van Small Cells e.d. op een schaal  en met een stralingsfrequentie die we niet eerder hebben gezien.

De fractie van PAL GroenLinks heeft de volgende vragen:

  1. (H)erkent u bovengenoemde maatschappelijke onrust en het gebrek aan sturingsmogelijkheden voor gemeenten? Hoe kijkt u daar tegen aan?
  2. Is u bekend of proeven met 5G ook in de gemeente Leeuwarden hebben plaatsgevonden of gaan plaatsvinden? En zo ja, wanneer en voor hoe lang?

Zo nee, bent u voornemens of bereid schriftelijk navraag te doen bij het ministerie van EZ, of ook in Leeuwarden proeven worden voorbereid?

Het college van B&W Maastricht heeft net als 25 andere gemeenten een zienswijze ingediend waarop zij ingaat op vele aspecten waarmee een gemeente te maken krijgt bij deze wetswijziging. O.a. ten aanzien van de volksgezondheid, vergunningen/welstand, beheer en onderhoud, uitvoering, vervreemding gebouw, de energievoorziening, ecologie, verstoringen van voorzieningen, juridische aspecten en financiën. (Zienswijze Maastricht Telecomwet1998 van 5 september jl. is te vinden op gemeentemaastricht.nl)

  1. Bent u op de hoogte van deze ingediende zienswijze? Onderschrijft u de inhoud van deze zienswijze? Bent u van plan om dit kenbaar te maken bij het Ministerie van EZ?

Zo nee, heeft u net als ons ook zorgen en vragen over een of meerdere van bovengenoemde aspecten. Zo ja, welke zijn dat?

De fractie van PAL GroenLinks is van mening dat bij een eventuele implementatie van 5G, vooraf dient vast te staan dat 5G en Small Cell Antennes geen risico’s mogen vormen voor de volksgezondheid. Hiervoor is onderzoek door een deskundige en onafhankelijke organisatie wenselijk.

  1. Bent u dit met ons eens? En bent u bereid hier op aan te dringen bij de betrokken instanties?

Wij zien de antwoorden op deze vragen graag spoedig tegemoet.

De fractie van PAL GroenLinks

Petra Vlutters

 

Afgelopen maandag was de eerste ‘Optocht der Zachtmoedigen’. Wat doet jouw gemeente om 5G te voorkomen?

Verminder Electrosmog – Groeiend Platform voor de bewustmaking van de keerzijde van electromagnetische straling.
View in browser
Jullie doen goed mee, steeds meer en dat is geweldig! Na het versturen van de vorige nieuwsbrief (meld je aan) kwam er een groot aantal extra reacties op de internetconsultatie, zat de zaal bij Emil vol, ontving Nanco ontzettend veel bijval en met name de demonstratie was een groot succes!

De eerste Optocht der Zachtmoedigen

INHOUD

Verslag van de Optocht

5G Weg Ermee!

Op een maandag zonder Mona

Gemeenten komen in verzet

Prachtig verslag van Silvia Belgraver

The Trojan Horse

VIDEO ‘Optocht’

VIDEO ‘Sprekers’

Tips voor Minder Electrosmog

Aarding (korting op producten)

Petitie

In deze nieuwsbrief nr 40, nog wat meer over de 5G demonstratie, goed nieuws en help mee / haak aan!

fa9f96046383be023241b5aefc3e6b89a12e4d9994b332a92ee0f0c9905cfdb7.jpg?e=ONV5Ssig8KdTLIih6M3977DtKytW4xxSbfy0y4MtZKHIehrT2l90WDyQd4BVW8GeUtRCH2o5J9MSv-pSSkVBl78Msrg5MM-h4Q1ZR48Of4HRsmfuJqETkrl2bVr3UR1XaWt2dtlmkZByg2qUI5ejI3XfFb2J10_MwQHB8WHL9bl1ndoL9O4XsAOsVOR0q7mkpIta6p-JuEGb2AkBmDJYgJc3le3eawbPWGsUpo6u1nLGyx5wgQ
Succesvolle Demonstratie

Afgelopen maandag is er een geweldige manifestatie geweest welke te kleurrijk, vrolijk en verbindend was om de naam demonstratie te dragen.

Daarom noem ik haar de:

‘Optocht der Zachtmoedigen

Wat een hoop mooie mensen, bekenden en wat fijn om eindelijk ook veel onbekenden te zien. Meer en meer mensen die weten hoe het zit, haken aan en het voelde eigenlijk als één grote vriendelijke familie, met een missie.

Lees hier een verslag

013242ebb6a359267ce9e1578751245a66c9e902592dc38bf334467bb1176948.jpg?e=jqpIZ4sMAETA3qZUNV454A-Joxd1JWocSkACiKi3H2RNvynwCbpW3O-Hn24mhVs5ra1wqBveCIAShkB_m7A7ZzwXBcPYVI-ElNW7WqWITVfuCVbiIpp9273UCDozNpoLEnoyFskDTc9J-1Gr_wZ6XtqRX1rV5q7S2N1tMvyeRiGxCVuttWd2llpXP1DkiOJFVor1ziFlR3duPpkRQUHR5Dfsm8HCTUcSdcbpwDvYBgZ6JO2Lu5I
9efd35864fa9fa9e7d371b87336b7ae58b05cf73234bde4db6d932bf59898796.jpg?e=9lB6BYld8kZuA5eWteGu2b59bKhV1EaDDp0LtlSKy3HPzMaqduNUV815T1EOh3038FZtVmm2Pv5EviPkzXVjYUlMTm4fYnrOF_B0ky1eJrW6Hz1z-Z20hMvm6wIuoYZNDCie23lKdmO-ZQrwSWlLJvdpfSQ2BFPMAokfo_-k0-weYFDxU_Jh9jufuKbaD4RhYf3_CAi8UbHguxbN44w_C-jmV9xwpelW6kiE9sQsqT6T06n-DKM
5G Weg Ermee!

Er waren prachtige spandoeken gemaakt voor onze optocht… zoals deze hierboven van Eke Vriens

5G Weg Ermee!

11478db5ffc5eed690aef7ec6f68ebbe21e09a768babaa71f9d161cbfd831be4.jpg?e=e6W3E7aG_P4dFzMTYcKtsUCM_O9IHMNB-cTlulRvOc9VEJyE9MurDFnHmvxx-KlEoKkWITgn6hGBq6O3KDRLF1oKjwUTjurAmwZAa-l8xCHgP4Iem-MsnVmmlfiXsPQJZOwapmcA_GfZfHUD2VfvasQgwVqsiGCrR05uHo0goh-00CMtoa6Yi6oeGo126pa_96BiqJD2eg8wNqRPKMr33L8UfeOldHZDX_Hsicu2U5s-FTlQK_M
4968e6c19ab6065cd87505f1e0a991f48889854b1c1a0c787fb2a97c2c60d2f0.jpg?e=DDVQ_GBQkyteUUzUjIUpWIHMj1pX-j-3PjfEvb6WJ8s4z6pq57r9uJAeigMckmt1ZfZjgqV80w43rnik6RJQv9m22Thv4H1GSUxB7EAMxw8fbsVC5AGQEuEHNDXJSQmOZ5ylTDwALMkLzX4Q2OM91gDMHCYy6a6LI2ses_5V_GCXfxqPd4G7CP_CIuxIthVWyRebGfjPNcUtGHJyF-ZTVnvSPwy4H3D_Js2TqlaGf8Qj72rbQAQ
065ce16853ca6560ccad8584ebfb33c59b944e42d8a4bf70c9cbc52012576ea0.jpg?e=wJEHggOmBMCJpR2JKoZudNDQ4JFY0DaA16tONbIH7NQc1DD5pR-Km7_BFTxby4HUsea94BiZITos9hAbJDLA8QeP4-dsG48be1yRkea4Rjq4aIANyB-e0Q_49QIWWRL9DwotAP4yl2u2sTJ3h4OCq9cr1uMJD-TFAaYkfSVUb3mkMpFNg8CCOq4sZiAK_eJgCTB6Btz9tZ_3YtnXLpX7sCTak7UucFK4updN5rx-V-7UEDb463E
‘Op een maandag zonder Mona’

Ondanks dat het op een maandag was, speciaal voor Mona Keijzer, zodat we haar informatie konden overhandigen, waren er erg veel mensen die hadden vrijgenomen om erbij te zijn. Wat goed dat jullie er waren!
Hoeveel mensen zouden er geweest zijn als het op een zaterdag was?

Enkele kinderen waren er ook. Helaas kregen veel kinderen die mee wilden geen vrij.
Dat is vreemd omdat 5G 1,7 keer meer energie gaat verbruiken dan 4G (erbovenop dus). Dat is 1,7 koelkast per persoon erbij.
Weet je hoeveel spaarlampen dat zijn?

Dit is hét onderwerp als het gaat over energie.

Volgende keer gewoon komen dus… !

Dankzij de enorme inspanningen van Petra Groot, Georgette Polderman en Alja hoeksema, is dit een geweldige manifestatie geweest om ons te laten horen, omdat dat via alle andere kanalen al veel te lang niet gebeurt. Jammer genoeg was Mona Keijzer er zelf niet en door geen afvaardiging te sturen heeft ze laten blijken niet geïnteresseerd te zijn in de mening van het volk. Op de een of andere manier had ik dat gevoel al 😉

d1bc866d9ed75aa4c2f27046ecb8fec88693519004aeb13f563dc070a554a0c2.jpg?e=vbBuus7eBqs1vxydRvpfE3mcmNYxafVSNfUXTZSSBjLH-Yjkvw9qguazgoDlY3Aj6ib7UBzHP6bdWxCPZF7xs4MOaWbViLrYbudXglSOPmp7daIOHDDpBPRxUcxhsH4w8AqM1JuszJbcXrGlRslSJAYiT_ZGBNIQZKkcGC4wJCw2mKnuUIEa1uwaohezfMTqI5-vx9kMm80TEU5voe8pcIBCvuSCdE1V2qtKbHgoNSaGz6BQEgQ
c4664decc8c7886d02daf16cc1723c543aa7729918aa72be711a72cf0a53ca03.jpg?e=jZQbFoON2jQELRZ4xrHjcPG6zbMELbUI8PFlOgd9xay9ZvPJ-XC3tHtlkky09WpB0UbVRIz0OQ0oQhBtXzpECWQhiUKzRMgi2wr8F4GkETNSRvjeB2CTxDKbVPbWU_6nSvXJZcFmZxq5PyL82BFVH9CK2dQU5r7LpveCS5YNSp1u5xMkTUZ00Tc7AxW6f4RjIgotmjx4zAdJuJr7H4TB6WV1cZjirKKAJIuoSG5dIvvUN7GQCQo
Steeds meer gemeenten komen in verzet. Is de jouwe al op de hoogte?

De overheid heeft op 16 juli zowaar een concept wetsvoorstel gepubliceerd waarin te lezen valt dat zij gemeenten willen gaan verplichten om mee te werken aan de uitrol van 5G. Er was een internetconsultatie online geplaatst, voor de mening van het volk (oh ja, die zijn er ook nog). Mocht u dat ter ore zijn gekomen had u daar uw mening kunnen geven, precies vanaf één week voor de zomervakantie tot één week erna.

Dankzij een mooie actie van Emil Möller, die niet lag te slapen, was de gemeente Maastricht de eerste die kritische vragen hierover ging stellen. Daarna hebben nog 24 anderen dit gedaan.

Kijk hier naar de reacties van gemeenten, en of die van jou al wakker is

e0d67d3bf78ebb79ff68b1da14553a1044aa004a660652ac4bed4fcd47044f94.jpg?e=MFouaekOMVRPK_foymc2aO9DspPfn_-WGDZdO8ooBVGrPCnxiJtbdr-DieHj6oATqZcxH7uMtKIwLB8RxEOTrsMVI8L-D9UE-yVGSUKuqbC-WGUY72mocT1jS4fZy5dIPw1tPIDsFbyn0aiQDQhLOW7cRIv1QhdqEFNaW_vbZrIh43jW2DVDGaHga2jUcynG0DxPfp9YBkIM5ZrC7dpDzOesKLyYRBsqLn00LPwjwe6Ou7Qb0P8
Prachtig verslag

Nog een prachtig verslag van de allereerste Landelijke 5G demonstratie is gemaakt door Silvia Belgraver (en nog wel meer). Onderaan vind je ook een overzicht van hoe de reguliere media het verhaal afzwakt en verdraait, maar er niet omheen kan het te noemen… Lees het hier.

af7b4c579704cd3dc3379440c6dda85f5371c1f88e384212fe9442da95bb06c7.jpg?e=HDQih6ebsyVE9NCpA4iLR94oj8jPwRY9pTMgvH0uhWUTxeimn5H8xabWmYMzRtd4f-YDwXVRgLahxGZUNFumYfEw7oKuoPeeMWPjWSHV0WuSNDZ75ICnpRZB5fwtOfFEf61nCgrhV1dW9uMKhqMVH4j_AcojNSvY5ZwG8KoMgst8U2LzAX0NHEeFdPpglbhDD_EckW0Rj-9vHHleiFTUs6t8P_aVOzt7o4hrbkjN38CDnN_MfIo
The Trojan Horse

Zie hier een kort gesprek met Emil Möller die afgelopen zondag een live gesprek had met vele prominenten uit de ‘stralingsscene’. Ja, haha… je kunt er inmiddels beroemd mee worden…

27c9fb5a724ce928651aa49e80173cffb4e637b4fdfc0b80eaba25a7915d523e.jpg?e=XvHrXt9Kdsri1kSB0oIghGye7SMNs4Lv8cE4Mdyt_-maQat_8ln4DMjOSnsXMFHAW-W2Z8f2__Q1Q2_Bfw-4mZWKtycAX_cm0juEK7Mf-JqM-jkXOSWDl4AjjfWp_enEwLGtlIxQAcL0JAL7RAnvM-iXRQ-WZ-TQNyuWj-P8azEaNot3d6BKtIDwdXOKhP4lg-Ikkf3WGuum_R3xmml-s-WMvNiGcH8ADTSUTIiknm0m2Nd36F8
VIDEO (optocht)

Klik op de afbeelding hierboven om een fijne sfeerimpressie te zien
van De Optocht. Ondanks dat het een maandag was, om Mona Keijzer te treffen, waren er veel mensen bij.

Met dank voor dit fijne videoverslag aan: Jan den Ouden

98ecbc1bd0551dfdd693a94be28396e7823fbbb4d3cb8053d4648de014a57e1a.jpg?e=oTbae9t_cFC4dhuQMV9JYq3LuTjzbazeQSoYYvq2v9O7nJ4QW0Iavq6hS-UEoDgEpvq7mK6MX1xGBowc9-iMrt_FmFkloILMUxVpFoKrhQxL9NgdpnOPIaqkUnijr6O_nWQN4GqEhYQUOHJpeJwMN_-_7N0zICV2Ztv2vQepXkN_pD6VDt9H-8Ok5KzqlhDxsdaj7pTSkE3p3ZvZugGKMzMiev5qevrAav-tfnn4MB6g40pWvQ4
VIDEO (sprekers)

Er was veel media aanwezig op de manifestatie. Wil je de sprekers ook nog zien en horen welke deze dag waren uitgenodigd? Klik dan op Georgette op de afbeelding hierboven.

60b85e7ee2ced9795cc91d43e5bcad015d9e2fe28774b8d527a7ba975cecf8fa.jpg?e=XegluZ18iT1Bct-pED1izO1YeYsQW7jxUwppd3dGYvidMn6JS4QqHIERo0D-SqtKh9z5TiLkDi8-FdWXcUc59sE_qciO9MgJCxpzj9R0iFCRwkY8Q3ARJ3_x6I5-noV4fwhZRr9wN19qMa53YrGubUUQIabA0dJlW-VVW6NIQ-S9bP6JHcju3NRuV4f1bZ6mFSTc25mmTEGmAEBeWeNQ0Qy3Dq_dd0SJllMqNhabGo40NsSE6Ts
Op de radio

Hier een link naar radio 2 in een interview met mij, vanaf minuut 20, een paar minuten bij Shay
Hier een link van Zaanradio in een lang interview (vanaf 40:35) met Hannah Hordijk. Top gedaan!

fd4bed9a071dbd6855edb0fb634d0346a75fed3ecf88cb63da024ede6797c89c.jpg?e=SzuXR6HtgL1J3Lyweb9YMAgHHW2nyATEJx4bmBg88h-2Ci2pDcckCc4MQ5uEDw1QJ8tVSTZewNTNqhTzD4lyKQ3D1CDjfnEBIkL7bEyRPOya8QXC7OZ-Wg8kOKlkSxbEbQh535NhuTEPFmIt2grJExIz0Cos3v-sAmzWXDeiWKjDrI0m2w8q_GGc87PDQ2Ictt7kXo8OAgTO_V2l_HxVW8QA3GZXjtTFQSgl3ktj8N0eBrnpvTs
Tips

Wil je weten wat je kunt doen om de hoeveelheid Electrosmog in jouw leefomgeving te verminderen? Kijk dan hier voor de TIPS

85402732fbf265599bbc362a900bccc864115041cd6c1c72df253524ef89c735.jpg?e=lt1d06ZtmnpNY0P7pdpF7K6gTyLy5lBAXv1RyweaYKmvTI29L6JR5JwkXUzM_iTQLvytCJNx7YHd9oOO1ez-42s6JMU_J7lxpcH6oJIDFchL973E8GTNO7vc1wLYCLVCB3xs-yGTB1t8oyW2CO8W3lErcxvfXwnK1gO0AOiy6mE52DsFgSTPYjmCou5TbjNN2BIG_fx5exnRKWPceSnZ8T3zwRPgSLhr8CPRdOqpm3XIYIDQDgk
Aardingsproducten

Wanneer je last hebt van straling, is aanpakken en reduceren van de stralingsbronnen het beste wat je kunt doen! Een goede tweede is het versterken van je aarding ook binnen of in je bed.

ZIE FILMPJE

Een aardingsmat of aardingsdeken kan, mits goed geaard, echt een enorm verschil maken op je gezondheid en je nachtrust. Ik ken weinig dingen die meer voor mij betekenden naast de stralingsreductie, en het op de barricade gaan, wat nodig blijft.

Bestel je producten hier met 5% korting code:

‘ STRALINGENZO ‘

c2850a2541035f21d05d57f5fc19b6a1bf2f0f355947d1c105ebb6ac6454597e.png?e=aEaknuDNXcdT4QzaDVVBebU7K-iJ-ZCg_9--cL2bzkf6-8psAWIxAmmLxbRkWMXrOlrG7ryKdTUD-UcDNk5pnLauK4QMhln7aGUNSbYmJpOFN6msj7eJqbitMhz9qXwJheH4NaPBhdBwMOILGrz3Nbu1MsdSnCA64MREuC73f6pcbmabzH59oZClVx4DpBCclcXMJ-GBH-5biuskqutIT49N6Gp5O7mkINOdIWCBfVm50od-QCc
Donatie

Met hartelijke dank aan iedereen die tot op heden een bijdrage heeft gedaan!! Dat blijft super welkom. Het liefst heb ik dat je gewoon zelf meehelpt. Lukt dat op een of andere manier niet, dan is een donatie zeer welkom.

Doneren kan hier…

fdb318942c968ea8bd757f718cb35cd842afe5143a6423fdd90e2e878738b090.jpg?e=fUPwwMVbLKdgjZXffZ5mqsLirm50kQ0EgOEMG1qthTT-Oyw2aQOMHjGe6yhhG2bTvpv-p3OWQsCvMBXl6swVVVMTCxRK5WpQbY4td7LQfTx8_NEEiTwBbzR-tyohj4OjHI-wBJNX2aZUijLPapN84SUNz92_YIQ_4ceD3-B_bxX1FzJOgx9m6RgyAPj7FMvzIOvEoI4TgI8udo_eFj6v7C2mToWry89_xyGwRV0Ud--nTLRVbX8
We blijven doorgaan, teken ook de Petitie
als je dat nog niet gedaan hebt!
Heb je facebook? Op een laptop met kabelinternet… 🙂
Kom dan naar: Straling & Zo

Met wederom een zorgzame groet.

Hartelijk dank!!

Marloes van Mensvoort

Rob Verboog

 

5G proeven ook in Leeuwarden?

Hallo Petra Vlutters

Het ministerie van Wiebes EZ heeft toestemming gegeven voor de proeven met 5G in Maastricht.

De gemeente wist nergens van, en is daar zeer ontevreden over.

Bijgevolg zal ook gem Leeuwarden van niks weten, als er proeven zijn gedaan met 5G.
Om er nu achter te komen, of er in Leeuwarden is getest, zo ja met of zonder toestemming van het ministerie kom je dus alleen achter via een vraag, aan het ministerie.

Wij willen jou verzoeken een schriftelijke vraag te stellen aan het College van B en W, of men na wil gaan bij het ministerie EZ of er in gemeente Leeuwarden is geëxperimenteerd met 5 G.

Deze tekst zou je eventueel kunnen gebruiken:

In Maastricht is gebleken dat het ministerie EZ toestemming heeft gegeven aan Vodafone/Kpn om proeven te doen met 5G, zie bijlage.
De gemeente en de bevolking daarvan in onkunde latend.
Is het College bereid navraag te doen bij het ministerie EZ, dhr Wiebes, of dergelijke proeven ook in de gemeente Leeuwarden hebben plaatsgevonden. Zo ja, wanneer, en voor hoe lang?

Is het college tevens bereid en in staat ook zelfstandig navraag te doen bij de grote providers alhier?

Wij hopen spoedig van je te horen, bij voorbaat dank

Met vriendelijke groet,

Manon Schmale en Rinske Balsma

—————————————-

Antwoord

Dag Manon Schmale,

Hartelijk dank voor deze adequate informatie!
Ik heb onlangs onze wethouder er naar gevraagd, en die heeft inderdaad nog niets gehoord over een aanvraag. Uit uw bericht begrijp ik dat dat lang niet alles zegt.
Ook heb ik landelijk navraag gedaan bij onze partij en zijn er binnen GroenLinks meerdere gemeenten die zich ernstig zorgen maken over 5G.

Ik ga er mee aan de slag!

Nogmaals bedankt.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Petra Vlutters
Raadslid Pal GroenLinks

T 058 2670735 / 06 48673221

M petra.vlutters

ZienswijzeMaastrichtTelecomwet1998.pdf

Groot 5G-Congres, The Trojan Horse

Beste mensen,

Aanstaande zondag de 15e september vind het grote 5G-congres in De Melkweg in Amsterdam plaats van 19.00-22.00 uur.
Deze avond zal onverbloemd de waarheid over 5G verteld worden en zullen de sprekers van het wereldtoneel u informeren.

Eerst zal Emil Möller aan het woord komen over 5G. Emil is specialist in transitieprocessen, schreef daar een boek over en is ondertussen het boegbeeld in Nederland geworden in de strijd voor het leven en daarmee tegen 5G.

Emil interviewt daarna Barrie Trower via Skype. Barrie Trower is één van ‘s werelds grootste experts in EMV (elektromagnetische velden) en werkte bij de Royal Navy en de British Secret Service, alwaar dit als militair wapen ontwikkeld is.https://youtu.be/z99_SzoXZdY

Daarnaast zijn ook aanwezig via een live video feed:

en ter afsluiting zal Lotte Walda haar fantastische nummer Beautiful People zingen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DC3lrebOqs

ER ZIJN NOG 15 TICKETS VOOR DE MELKWEG VOOR 7,50 (normale prijs 14,40)
bij voldoende bezetting gaan we met een touringcar vanuit Maastricht, vertrekkend vanaf de Geusselt 16.00 uur. ( 20 a 22,50 pp). beneden de 40 mensen zullen we carpoolen.

https://stralingsbewust.info/2019/06/18/congres-5g-the-trojan-horse/

Wil je meegaan stuur ons dan een bericht naar: 5g.stralingsinfomaastricht

met hartegroet,
Team Maastricht Stralingsinfo

Persbericht <>

Sent to all Dutch city councils and boards of governors September 9, 2019:

Geachte mevrouw, mijnheer,

Graag uw aandacht voor het volgende.

Mogelijk heeft u gehoord dat Maastricht als eerste gemeente protest heeft aangetekend tegen de nieuwe Telecomwet.
In de bijlage ‘ZienswijzeMaastrichtTelecomwet’ kunt u daar kennis van nemen en op https://www.1limburg.nl/maastricht-maakt-bezwaar-den-haag-tegen-5g-netwerk wordt hier verslag over gedaan in de krant.

Dit is des te opmerkelijker in het licht van het feit dat eind jaren ’90 de telecomindustrie en de landelijke overheid afgesproken hebben de burgers NIET in te lichten over de gezondheidsrisico’s.
Op https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_P5-NbXma70 is dit te vernemen uit de mond van een ex CEO van KPN.

De gronden van deze gemeente zijn voor een groot deel terug te vinden in een meta studie genaamd ‘Biological and pathological effects of 2.45 GHz radiation on cells, fertility, brain, and behavior’.
Deze treft u aan als bijlage. Er zijn 10.000- en studies over dit onderwerp, maar met dit rapport komt u voor nu goed op de hoogte.

Vooraleer u een en ander tot u neemt, is het helpend om een artikel op de GGZ site [https://ggz.nl/5g-een-netwerk-van-mogelijkheden-en-risicos/ ] en kamervragen van de PvdD [https://www.partijvoordedieren.nl/vragen/vragen-van-raan-over-de-uitrol-van-5g] te lezen, alsmede het ‘Rapport mobiele communicatie en gevaren’.
Ook deze gaat bij.

Mocht u meer willen weten over wat een weeffout in bestuurlijk Nederland en adviesraden kan worden genoemd, dan is een recente presentatie voor de Raad in M’tricht verhelderend.
U vindt deze hier: https://drive.google.com/open?id=13eqVUGK0eDy3uUDiRH-o3jibKkAoHdWpe9ttmRtcMHE

Er dienen zich 2 punten aan:

1. als u zich in 1 x volledig op de hoogte wil brengen ten aanzien van deze materie, dan kunt u deelnemen aan een symposium gewijd aan dit onderwerp.
De aankondiging ervan vind u hier: https://www.melkweg.nl/en/agenda/ultimate-science-15-09-2019/
Op dit symposium zullen wereldwijd toonaangevende experts aanwezig zijn. Vertegenwoordigers van bestuurlijk Nederland, adviesraden en telecomindustrie zijn uitgenodigd.
Er is ruime gelegenheid tot het stellen van vragen, zodat u al uw vragen beantwoord kunt zien die dag.
Indien u met meerdere mensen wil komen [pers, sceptici, GGD, Milieu-organisaties, verontruste burgers, enz], dan zijn touringcars beschikbaar.

2. na bezoek aan dit symposium is de kans groot dat u in een spanningvolle situatie bent terechtgekomen: volgt u de landelijke overheid of beschermt u de mensen die u vertrouwen?
In het bijgevoegde onderzoek ‘Bed-Bad-Brood Bestuurlijke ongehoorzaamheid’ kunt u kennisnemen van een precedent, wat toepasbaaar is op de huidige situatie ten aanzien van 5g.
Mondiaal gaan steeds meer mensen zien wat er aan de hand is, zoals bijvoorbeeld hier: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/

Vriendelijke groet,

Emil Möller
0651860992
5g.stralingsinfomaastricht

ZienswijzeMaastrichtTelecomwet1998.pdf

Rapport-Mobiele-communicatie-en-gevaren.pdf

Wilke_Review_umg_2018_Eng_df.pdf

Bed-Bad-Brood bestuurlijke ongehoorzaamheid.pdf